GET THE APP

..

Arts and Social Sciences Journal

ISSN: 2151-6200

Open Access

Comparison of Two Biomass−to−Electricity Systems′ Social Life Cycle Assessment

Abstract

Mario Gamba*

Numerous decarbonization initiatives that aim to lessen the immediate and long-term effects of climate change depend heavily on biomass. Decision-makers must take into account all potential sustainability consequences of bioenergy systems when making decisions in this context. The present work uses the Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) methodology to compare the social performance of two biomass-to-electricity systems located in Portugal that use either fluidized-bed or grate furnace technology, in particular because studies addressing the social sustainability of bioelectricity are lacking. S-LCA uses a thorough methodology for the analysis and interpretation of social data. Child labour, forced labour, the gender wage gap, the proportion of women in different occupational groups, health care costs, and the contribution to economic development were the six social indicators that were benchmarked.

HTML PDF

Share this article

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 1413

Arts and Social Sciences Journal received 1413 citations as per Google Scholar report

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward