Bhuiyan MZR, Talukder TH, Rahman A and Sharmin S
Background: Cancer of the uterine cervix is the eight most common cancer among women worldwide and third among all malignancies and the second most common cancers in female in Bangladesh. The treatment of cervical cancer requires multidisciplinary approaches Concurrent chemoradiation is the treatment of choice in locally advanced carcinoma cervix uteri. Radiotherapy is the primary local treatment for most patients having FIGO stage IIB to IVA diseases. The success of treatment depends on a careful balance between EBRT and Brachythcrapy that optimizes the dose to tumor. Iridium-192 is highly used radionuclide for modern remote after loading HDR brachytherapy till date. Recently Cobalt-60 source is available with miniature size and identical physical properties for remote afterloaders.
Methods: Ninety-eight patients with biopsy proven locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix were enrolled in the study. Arm A was formed comprising 49 patients who were treated by Ir192 HDR brachytherapy and Arm B formed with equal number of 49 patients who received HDR brachytherapy treatment with Co60 radionuclide. This prospective observational study was carried out to compare the treatment effect between two Arm.
Results: 98 patients were enrolled in the study with an age ranges from 35 to 63 years. Most of the patients presented with stage IIB disease, consisting of 64 patients (65.3%). Among them 79 patients had squamous cell carcinoma (80.60%), adenocarcinoma trailing with 15 patients (15.3%) and rest were adenoid-squamous carcinoma 3 and small cell carcinoma 1. In all three insertions, urinary bladder dose distribution was slightly smaller by HDR Co60 irradiation than HDR Ir192 exposure. These differences were statistically significant in first two insertions but not in third one
Conclusion: In this study radiation dose distribution at OARs i.e. urinary bladder and rectum were compared between Arm A and Arm B. In all three insertions in urinary bladder the mean dose distribution was slightly smaller in HDR Cobalt-60 irradiation than HDR Iridium-192 exposure. These differences were statistically significant in first two insertions but not in third one. In case of rectum point, the mean dose distribution were significantly lower in all three insertions of Co60 exposure than Ir192 exposure. So that considering the long half life and low cost, Co60 can be a acceptable alternative radionuclide’s used in HDR brachytherapy.
PDFShare this article
Cancer Science & Therapy received 3968 citations as per Google Scholar report
