GET THE APP

..

Cancer Science & Therapy

ISSN: 1948-5956

Open Access

Dosimetric Validation of Commissioning Data Validation of Xio Treatment Planning System on a Philips Linear Accelerator

Abstract

Ahmed Mohamed Hussein Mohamed*, Ismail Emam and Amer Mohamed

Treatment planning is one of the main steps in radiotherapy. It includes dose, isodose and monitor units (MUs) calculations. The dose calculation is based on algorithms implemented in the treatment planning system (TPS). For a suitable clinical use, these algorithms must calculate the dose as accurately as possible. The aim of this work is the assessment of treatment planning system installed in Aswan Oncology Institute to perform dosimetric validation of various parameters.

Measurements have been performed using existing Elekta linear accelerator, (scanditronix-wellhofer dosimetry) system, and water phantom. A variety of 3D conformal fields were created in Xio TPS on a combined Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom and validated against measurements with a calibrated ion chamber. Some of the parameters such as (Tissue phantom ratio (TPR), surface dose, buildup, flatness, symmetry, penumbra, contamination dose) varied including source to surface distance, field size, gantry angle, and depth for all photon and electron energies. The difference between measurements and calculation of flatness and symmetry values at different electron energies were between -0.4% to 1.7% and 6 MV didn’t exceed ± 0.8%. The mean difference in value of penumbra of electron beams was -4.97% and 6 MV was ± 5%. TPR and surface dose at 6 MV increased with the field size (FS) increasing. All the resulted difference of measurements and calculation were in agreement with IAEA-TRS430 and Venselaar et al. which didn’t exceed ± 2% at flatness, symmetry and ±15% at penumbra. This investigation on dosimetric validation ensures accuracy of Xio TPS thereby improving patient safety.

PDF

Share this article

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 5332

Cancer Science & Therapy received 5332 citations as per Google Scholar report

Cancer Science & Therapy peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward