Mimi Borrelli, Christopher Young and Rizwan Attia
Aim: To study the world literature on patients undergoing surgical repair of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). We assessed if the volume or experience of the center or surgeon affects outcomes.
Methods: Literature was reviewed using the OVID platform for Medline® and Pubmed from 1966-2017. 51 papers were identified of which 12 studies met the inclusion criteria and represented the highest level of evidence to answer the research question.
Results: Retrospective cohort analysis of 1550 UK patients operated on by 249 surgeons using national audit data found low volume surgeons (LVS) had higher in-hospital mortality vs high volume surgeons (HVS) (19.3% vs 12.6%, P=0.015, OR: 0.853 CI: 0.733-0.992, P=0.039), but no relationship between mortality and center volume. Five large retrospective studies using the United States (US) Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database looked at 29292 cases. Higher-volume centers (HVC) were associated with lower mortality following ATAAD repair vs lower-volume centers (LVC) (27.5% vs 16.4%, P<0.001; 34% vs 25%, P=0.003; 23.4% vs 12.1%, P=0.014; 12.6% vs 23.9%, P=0.013). A single-center cohort study in Germany, UK and three in the US reported decreased mortality after introduction of a specialized team/protocol for ATAAD repair (34.5% vs 8%, P<0.001; 33.9% vs 2.8%, P<0.0001; 33.9% vs 7.7%, P<0.0001; 22.9% vs 9.7%, P=0.002; 30.8% vs 9.7%, P=0.014).
Conclusion: There is moderate evidence of a volume-outcome relationship for ATAAD surgery. This may be driven by surgeon or institutional volume. There is stronger evidence that establishing specialized multidisciplinary teams and standardized protocols reduces morbidity and mortality.
PDFShare this article
Cardiovascular Diseases & Diagnosis received 427 citations as per Google Scholar report
