Journal of Bioengineering & Biomedical Science

Planning of Bimanual Movement Training Based on the Bilateral Transfer of Force and Proprioception by Using Virtual Impairment

Abstract

Keunyoung Park, Youngwoo Kim and Goro Obinata

Bilateral movement training based on robot-aided rehabilitation systems has been attracting a lot of attention as a post-stroke motor rehabilitation protocol. However, the critical training parameters that underlie the efficiency of bilateral movement have not been clarified. The primary question for planning of bilateral movement training is how the upper extremities interact with each other when function in one of the limbs is less than normal one. The effects of different conditions which were imposed on the unimpaired upper extremity were investigated to find exact therapeutic conditions for planning more appropriate bilateral movement training. Active/passive, loaded/non-loaded, and unimanual/bimanual movements were used as the experimental conditions. Twenty subjects were randomly assigned to one of four groups, namely the passive group (PG), the active non-load group (ANLG), active load group (ALG), and the control group (CG) and were asked to perform tasks with their left upper extremity with respect to the conditions. To carry out the experiments with healthy subjects, we use a robotic force field paradigm to impose a virtual impairment on the right upper extremity of the all subjects. After subject adapted to the robotic force field, all subject conducted the aftereffect test which consist of a bimanual movement task while the CG performed a unimanul movement task. Here we assume that, based on the bilateral transfer aspect, the recovery time from the adaptation to the robotic force field is varied by the conditions of left upper extremity in bimanual movement task. By comparing the recovery time from adaptation in each condition, we found the exact condition for planning of effective bilateral movement training. The comparison results revealed that the active loaded group showed the recovery time from adaptation was faster than another groups.