The demand for economic plurality has received a lot of support in recent years, but it is still being disputed for a variety of reasons. Although the majority of the literature on plurality in economics has focused on defending pluralism, this paper's main objective is to engage directly with criticism, which has not previously received enough attention. As a result, we add to the discussion of pluralism by going over five well-known and frequently made arguments against it. As a result, we present a new typology of critiques, in which some critique the pluralism movement while others reject the idea itself. Although we contend that the criticisms levelled at the movement are we believe the arguments against pluralism as a concept to be less compelling, but they do include viable contributions that pluralists must deal with.
HTML PDFShare this article
Business and Economics Journal received 5936 citations as per Google Scholar report
