DOI: 10.4172/2169-026X.1000234
Chaturvedi J, Agarwal A and Patodia A
DOI: 10.4172/2169-026X.1000235
DOI: 10.4172/2169-026X.1000236
When the management thinks of results normal perception is that the training events will improve employee performance. Without knowing the target is like shooting an arrow in the dark hoping that might hit the mark. Organizations’ normal protocol to conduct TNA is while going through employee performance appraisal. However, TNA provides broader aspects to seeing the performance gaps and resource channelization. TNA serves organizations in several ways which might provide input into training design, base line data for evaluation, assess the gaps in performance, competency levels of individuals etc. Evaluation models rely on TNA to be able to gain the results of training or create an impact. The missing person in any stage of training is the immediate supervisor who is hardly consulted in developing the training, the contents of the training or while s/he is supposed to reinforce the learning in the requisite job. This paper highlights the missing pieces and aligning the TNA to Training Evaluation.
DOI: 10.4172/2169-026X.1000237
This research used industry based survey data for assessing employees perceptions regarding safety culture and safety management specific to aviation industry. Results highlighted that for ensuring safety organizations are of the view that employee’s responsibilities towards safety are more essential than to implement safety management system (SMS) effectively and to inspire positive culture towards safety. Research results indicated that engineers involved in aircraft maintenance seemed to be more committed to standard operating procedures (SOPs) and effective organizational procedures/processes in ensuring maintenance system tasks and work. Amusingly, flyers viewed luck as important contributing factor towards safety. Generally, the findings propose the several aviation industry sectors need to do a lot more for ensuring improvement in existing safety culture.
DOI: 10.4172/2169-026X.1000238
Esfandabadi HM, Esfandabadi AM and Mousavi SF
DOI: 10.4172/2169-026X.1000239
Shuqqo H and Ghanayem F
DOI: 10.4172/2169-026X.1000240
Aragon R, McTigue K, Yang W, Elliott J and Downing GJ
DOI: 10.4172/2169-026X.1000241
DOI: 10.4172/2169-026X.1000242
Gyawali B, Dahal KR and Maharjan R
DOI: 10.4172/2169-026X.1000243
DOI: 10.4172/2169-026X.1000244
DOI: 10.4172/2169-026X.1000245
Entrepreneurship & Organization Management received 1115 citations as per Google Scholar report