Tanzania
Research Article
Physicians’ Assessment of Cancer Comorbidity Collection Methods: A Qualitative Analysis
Author(s): Stoner BP, Chandler Ezell K, Biswas B, Kallogjeri D and Piccirillo JFStoner BP, Chandler Ezell K, Biswas B, Kallogjeri D and Piccirillo JF
Objective: We conducted a qualitative assessment of oncologists’ preferences for comorbidity capture methods comparing the ICD-9 claims-based approach to the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27) record abstraction approach. Materials and Methods: Building upon theoretical foundations in anthropology, we developed a qualitative methodology to elicit the thoughts and reactions of 21 practicing oncologists about their preferences for claims-based vs. record-abstraction methods of capturing comorbidity. Grounded theory approach was used to identify recurring themes and dominant concerns expressed by multiple respondents. Codes were developed and applied in two phases: initial and focused. Results: Thematic analysis of qualitative interviews revealed five key domains of concern: accur.. Read More»
DOI:
10.4172/2576-3857.1000112
Journal of Oncology Medicine & Practice received 142 citations as per Google Scholar report