Department of Medical Health, Peters University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
Review Article
Comparison of Various Transcatheter Aortic Valves for Aortic Stenosis a Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Author(s): Ankur Sethi*, Emily Hiltner, Monarch Shah, Derek Schwabe-Warf, Bruce Haik, Abdul Hakeem and Mark Russo
Objectives: Our aim was to compare available Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) valves using direct and indirect evidence from Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT).
Background: TAVR is now an established treatment for majority of patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, there is limited data comparing various valves.
Methods: We performed a systematic search of electronic databases for RCT comparing a TAVR valve to a valve or surgery. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to compile evidence from both direct and indirect comparisons at 30 days and at one year.
Results: Twelve studies with 10,307 patients eligible for TAVR met the criteria and were included. Self-expanding Valve Core valve type (SEV_C) is associated with higher risk of pacemaker implantation and use.. Read More»
DOI:
10.37421/2329-9517.2023.10.556
Cardiovascular Diseases & Diagnosis received 427 citations as per Google Scholar report