A Brief Report on Physiology and Fluorescence Spectroscopy to Assess Gamete and Embryo Functionality in Animals

Kim Bueno^*
*Correspondence: Kim Bueno, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany, Email:

Introduction

The individual functions (genetics, endocrine, immunity, and pathology) of animals as well as their relationship with the environment (seasonality, thermal stress, and pollutants) all play a role in their reproductive efficiency. Due to the capacity of these cells to complete their intended function, which is reproduction, the fertility of the gametes that is, their capacity to fertilize and produce viable offspring plays a crucial role in this context. Full-term offspring and successful fertilization with embryo development demonstrate the gamete's fertility potential and the numerous factors affecting reproductive efficiency. However, due to high costs, time requirements, and organizational challenges, the fertility assessment is rarely used, and it is not applicable to humans. In order to accurately estimate gametes' fertilization and developmental competence, independent in vitro tests needed to be developed. One aspect of the gametes that is more or less related to fertility is examined in each of these tests [1]. In sperm analysis, combining multiple function indicators simultaneously to reduce fertility estimation error has been extensively studied [2]. The accuracy of the fertility potential assessment is improved using this method [3]; however, the possibility of unforeseen variables makes it difficult to arrive at an accurate fertility estimate. However, these fertility estimation tests proved to be very reliable for excluding germ cells rather than confirming their quality. In point of fact, the presence of some gamete functionality requirements does not guarantee procreative success if they are incompatible with fertility.

Description

The functionality evaluation is also applicable to early embryos, in addition to gametes. It is necessary to identify markers indicating maximum development competence and the birth of healthy individuals in order to select embryos that have been produced either in vitro or collected in vivo. Depending on the species, this discrimination can be used in many different contexts. For marine bio indicator organisms, the evaluation of correct embryo development may be associated with dysfunctions following exposure to various environmental stressors, whereas, for mammals, this selection may permit embryos to cryopreservation techniques. Because it is non-invasive and quick to perform, the microscopic analysis of embryo morphology is typically the easiest and most common examination. However, in order to support the microscopic evaluation and/or to provide new indications that cannot be evaluated by the morphology, this evaluation has been gradually supported by more complex analyses.

Meiosis, the one-of-a-kind process of cell division that results in a halving of the number of chromosomes, highlights the development of oocytes and spermatozoa during gametogenesis. The gamete quality, which is an in vitro estimation of fertility, is influenced by the correct gamete production, maturation, activation, and interaction. In vitro tests have been created determined to assess single credits of the gametes' usefulness fit for assessing their fruitfulness with a decent level of unwavering quality. In spermatozoa, these tests assess the motility and energy through modernized examination frameworks the number and fixation the suitability, the morphological and ultrastructural attributes, the DNA discontinuity, a few biochemical exercises, as well as the capacity to connect with the female gamete. The ovary, follicle, cumulus–oocyte complex, and, ultimately, the oocyte all have an impact on oocyte quality in mammals. Phase-contrast microscopy, vital dye staining, polarization light microscopy and more advanced methods like the genetic analysis of the polar body are typically used to evaluate it. The majority of quality evaluation for embryos is based on morphological analysis with genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics from embryonic biopsies and non-invasive profiling of the embryo culture medium secretome providing additional support when necessary. By collecting additional data that can sometimes shed light on previously unknown aspects of gamete and embryo functionality, the development of new assessment methods contributes to a more comprehensive examination of the quality of gametes. Our group's electrophysiology-based study of ionic currents is an alternative to the methods that are typically used to follow the dynamics of some gamete and embryo physiology-related mechanisms and identify associations with the criteria that are most commonly used to evaluate their quality [4,5].

Conclusion

In this review, two methods that our group frequently employs to examine the biology and function of gametes and embryos from marine invertebrates to humans were examined in depth. Electrophysiology techniques are, without a doubt, sophisticated methods that are difficult to use in diagnostic procedures but capable of revealing minute dynamics of the mechanisms governing embryonic development, fertilization, and gamete maturation. On the other hand, the methods used in fluorescence spectrometry have been designed to be quick and easy to use, making them capable of providing numerous details on the functioning and quality of the cells being examined. We believe that important information regarding the mechanisms of gamete function and embryo development has been and, we hope, will be revealed through the development of studies based on the application of these methods.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript.

References

1. Amann, Rupert P. "Can the fertility potential of a seminal sample be predicted accurately?." J Androl 10 (1989): 89-98.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Colenbrander, B., B. M. Gadella and T. A. E. Stout. "The predictive value of semen analysis in the evaluation of stallion fertility." Reprod Domest Anim 38 (2003): 305-311.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Holt, W. V. "Is quality assurance in semen analysis still really necessary? A spermatologist’s viewpoint." Hum Reprod 20 (2005): 2983-2986.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Rex, A. S., J. Aagaard and J. Fedder. "DNA fragmentation in spermatozoa: A historical review." Andrology 5 (2017): 622-630.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Sikka, Suresh C., and Wayne JG Hellstrom. "Current updates on laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of male reproductive failure." Asian J Androl 18 (2016): 392.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at