Opinion - (2024) Volume 14, Issue 6
Received: 02-Nov-2024, Manuscript No. jccr-25-159119;
Editor assigned: 04-Nov-2024, Pre QC No. P-159119;
Reviewed: 16-Nov-2024, QC No. Q-159119;
Revised: 23-Nov-2024, Manuscript No. R-159119;
Published:
30-Nov-2024
, DOI: 10.37421/2165-7920.2024.14.1635
Citation: Khoury, Tristan. “A Case of Nephrotic Syndrome in
an Infant: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges.”? J Clin Case Rep 14 (2024):
1635
Copyright: �© 2024 Khoury T. This is an open-access article distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author
and source are credited.
Nephrotic Syndrome (NS) is a condition characterized by a group of clinical features that include significant proteinuria, low serum albumin levels, edema, and hyperlipidemia. While nephrotic syndrome is a relatively wellrecognized condition in older children and adults, its occurrence in infants is quite rare and presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. In infants, nephrotic syndrome can be difficult to distinguish from other causes of edema, such as malnutrition, infections, or heart failure. Moreover, the delicate physiology of infants, along with the difficulty of obtaining accurate urine samples in this age group, adds layers of complexity to both the diagnosis and treatment of this condition. The causes of nephrotic syndrome in infants can be broadly categorized into primary and secondary causes. Primary nephrotic syndrome in infants is most often caused by Minimal Change Disease (MCD), a condition in which the kidneys appear normal under a microscope, but there is significant dysfunction at the level of the podocytes, the cells responsible for
the selective filtration of proteins. MCD is thought to result from an immunemediated process, though the exact mechanisms remain unclear. Secondary nephrotic syndrome can be caused by a variety of underlying conditions, such as congenital infections, autoimmune diseases, or metabolic disorders. In infants, the possibility of congenital nephrotic syndrome, a genetic disorder that results in nephrotic syndrome within the first few months of life, must also be considered [2]. Given that nephrotic syndrome in infants can present with nonspecific symptoms like swelling, poor weight gain, irritability, or lethargy, it can easily be misdiagnosed or mistaken for more common conditions, such as allergic reactions or gastrointestinal issues. The initial presentation may also be subtle, with edema being the most prominent symptom, making it harder to identify the underlying cause. The diagnosis of nephrotic syndrome in infants typically involves a combination of clinical observation, laboratory tests, and imaging studies. Urinary protein excretion is the cornerstone of diagnosis, with a 24- hour urine protein measurement or a urine protein-to-creatinine ratio being used to quantify proteinuria. However, obtaining accurate urine samples in infants can be challenging, and the measurement of proteinuria can sometimes be complicated by the presence of other conditions like urinary tract infections or dehydration. In some cases, kidney biopsy may be necessary to confirm the diagnosis and to differentiate between the various causes of nephrotic syndrome, though this is usually reserved for more severe or complicated cases [3]. Treatment of nephrotic syndrome in infants involves addressing both the immediate symptoms and the underlying cause. The first-line treatment for primary nephrotic syndrome, particularly minimal change disease, is the use of corticosteroids. Steroids are effective in most cases of nephrotic syndrome in infants, leading to a rapid reduction in proteinuria and improvement in edema. However, the use of steroids in infants comes with its own set of challenges, including the risk of side effects such as immunosuppression, growth retardation, and gastrointestinal disturbances. In some cases, infants with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome may require other immunosuppressive agents or biologic therapies, though these are often less studied in this very young population and may not always be appropriate due to the potential for long-term side effects. In addition to pharmacological treatment, the management of edema and fluid balance is critical in the care of infants with nephrotic syndrome. Edema can lead to respiratory distress, poor feeding, and developmental delays, and may also increase the risk of infections due to compromised skin integrity. Infants with nephrotic syndrome often require close monitoring of fluid status and may need diuretics to manage excess fluid. However, the use of diuretics must be carefully controlled to avoid dehydration and electrolyte imbalances, as the infant’s renal and circulatory systems are still immature and more prone to complications [4].
Nutrition is another crucial aspect of managing nephrotic syndrome in infants. These infants often experience protein loss through the urine, leading to hypoalbuminemia and a risk of malnutrition. Parenteral nutrition may be required in some cases to ensure adequate caloric and protein intake, particularly if the infant is unable to feed adequately due to swelling or lethargy. Balancing adequate nutrition to support growth while managing edema and minimizing the risk of infection presents a significant challenge. Secondary nephrotic syndrome in infants requires additional diagnostic workup to identify and treat the underlying condition. In cases where infections, metabolic disorders, or systemic diseases are suspected, targeted treatments such as antibiotics, antivirals, or immune-modulating therapies may be required. Identifying and addressing any contributing factors is essential for the effective management of nephrotic syndrome, as secondary causes may influence
the long-term prognosis of the condition. Despite the challenges in diagnosis and treatment, the prognosis for infants with nephrotic syndrome is generally favourable when appropriate management is provided. Most infants with primary nephrotic syndrome, especially those with minimal change disease, respond well to steroid therapy and have a good long-term outcome. However, in cases of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome or secondary nephrotic syndrome due to underlying conditions, the prognosis can be more variable and may require more aggressive and long-term management. Monitoring for complications, such as infections, thrombosis, or progressive kidney damage, is essential for ensuring optimal outcomes [5].
Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at
Journal of Clinical Case Reports received 1345 citations as per Google Scholar report