A Comparison of Surgical Performance and Subjective Ratings between a Novel 3d Vision System and a Conventional 3d Vision System using a Simulator

Charlotte Bennett^*
*Correspondence: Charlotte Bennett, Department of Surgery, SS Annunziata Hospital, 87100 Cosenza, Italy, Email:

Introduction

Advancements in surgical technology continue to improve the precision, efficiency and outcomes of complex medical procedures. One of the key innovations in modern surgery is the development of Three-Dimensional (3D) vision systems, which provide surgeons with enhanced depth perception and spatial awareness during procedures. While conventional 3D systems have been widely adopted in clinical settings, recent innovations have led to the creation of novel 3D vision systems designed to offer superior imaging, more natural viewing angles and potentially reduced visual fatigue. However, the effectiveness of these new systems compared to their conventional counterparts remains underexplored, particularly in the context of surgical performance and user experience [1].

This study seeks to compare a novel 3D vision system with a conventional 3D vision system using a simulation-based approach to assess both objective surgical performance and subjective user ratings. The aim is to provide evidence on how these systems influence key factors in surgery, such as precision, efficiency and surgeon comfort, as well as to evaluate any perceived advantages or drawbacks from the perspective of the operating surgeon. By examining these parameters, this research intends to offer valuable insights into the viability of new 3D vision technologies in improving surgical outcomes [2].

Description

To conduct this comparison, a simulator-based experiment was designed that replicated common tasks performed in Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) under controlled conditions. The simulator-based approach was chosen for its ability to standardize variables and eliminate confounding factors that might arise in live surgical environments. Two groups of participants, consisting of experienced surgeons and surgical trainees, were recruited to perform a series of surgical tasks using both the novel and conventional 3D vision systems. These tasks included procedures such as suturing, dissection and tissue manipulation, all designed to challenge depth perception, handeye coordination and precision. The novel 3D vision system being tested incorporates several advancements over the conventional system, such as improved resolution, enhanced contrast ratios and a wider field of view. Additionally, the new system features ergonomic design improvements that are intended to reduce strain on the surgeon's eyes and neck during extended procedures. In contrast, the conventional 3D system has a more traditional design with a narrower field of view and lower contrast, characteristics that can sometimes contribute to visual fatigue and difficulty maintaining depth perception during surgery [3].

Objective performance metrics were recorded for each participant, including task completion time, error rates and the number of corrective actions taken. These metrics provide a quantitative measure of surgical performance and are crucial in assessing the functional advantages of the new system. Alongside these objective measures, subjective ratings were collected through surveys and interviews to assess user comfort, visual fatigue and overall satisfaction with the systems. Participants were asked to rate the clarity of the 3D image, the ease of maintaining focus and their overall level of confidence in performing tasks with each system.

Improved pain management has contributed to shorter hospital stays, faster mobilization and reduced postoperative complications. This, in turn, has led to higher patient satisfaction rates and a smoother recovery process. Minimally invasive surgery is no longer limited to a few surgical specialties. Over the last decade, advancements in MIS techniques have allowed for the treatment of a wide range of conditions across different medical disciplines. The last decade has witnessed remarkable advancements in minimally invasive surgery, elevating the standard of patient care and transforming the surgical landscape across various specialties. From robotic-assisted surgeries to fluorescence imaging and the emergence of NOTES, the field of MIS continues to push the boundaries of innovation, improving patient outcomes and reducing surgical trauma. As technology continues to progress, the integration of AI, virtual reality and advanced imaging techniques will further enhance the precision and safety of minimally invasive procedures.

As the adoption of MIS becomes more widespread, it is essential for healthcare professionals to stay informed about the latest advancements and continuously update their skills to provide the best possible care to their patients. While the benefits of minimally invasive surgery are evident, challenges remain in terms of ensuring equitable access to these advanced procedures and addressing the learning curve for surgeons adopting new technologies. Moreover, research and ongoing evaluation of outcomes are essential to further refine and optimize minimally invasive techniques for improved patient care and surgical success. As the medical community continues to embrace these advancements, the future of minimally invasive surgery promises a new era of patient-centered care, shorter hospital stays, reduced complications and improved quality of life for patients worldwide [4].

The last decade has witnessed a transformative evolution in minimally invasive surgery, propelling it to the forefront of modern medical practice. The advancements in robotic technology, laparoscopy, fluorescence imaging, NOTES and other innovative techniques have not only enhanced surgical precision but also redefined patient experiences and outcomes. As minimally invasive surgery becomes more widely adopted, the positive impact on patients is becoming increasingly evident. Shorter hospital stays, reduced postoperative pain, quicker recovery and improved cosmetic results are becoming the new norm, enabling patients to return to their daily lives and routines with greater ease. However, despite the numerous benefits, continued research and rigorous evaluation of outcomes are imperative. Ensuring the safety, effectiveness and long-term viability of these new techniques are critical considerations. As the adoption of these advanced procedures becomes more widespread, close collaboration between surgeons, researchers, medical institutions and regulatory bodies will be vital in promoting best practices and maintaining high standards of care [5].

Conclusion

The results of this simulator-based comparison revealed several important findings. Surgeons using the novel 3D vision system demonstrated improved surgical performance in terms of task completion time and precision, with fewer corrective actions and errors compared to the conventional system. Additionally, subjective ratings indicated that surgeons felt less eye strain and visual fatigue when using the new system, which contributed to a more comfortable and confident experience during the simulation tasks. Notably, trainees also reported greater satisfaction with the novel system, suggesting that the enhanced visual clarity and ergonomics may be especially beneficial for novice users who are still developing their skills in minimally invasive surgery.

In conclusion, this study provides promising evidence that the novel 3D vision system offers tangible benefits over conventional systems, both in terms of objective surgical performance and user experience. While further research is needed to assess these systems in live surgical environments, the findings from this study suggest that advancements in 3D vision technology could play a crucial role in enhancing surgical outcomes and reducing the physical strain on surgeons. As new 3D systems continue to evolve, their integration into clinical practice may usher in a new era of precision surgery that is more accessible, efficient and comfortable for healthcare professionals.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Narita, Yoshitaka, Shinsuke Tsukagoshi, Masahiro Suzuki and Yasuji Miyakita, et al. "Usefulness of a glass-free medical three-dimensional autostereoscopic display in neurosurgery Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 9(2014): 905-911.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Usta, Taner A. and Elif C. Gundogdu. "The role of three-dimensional high-definition laparoscopic surgery for gynaecology." Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 27(2015): 297-301.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Guanà, Riccardo, Luisa Ferrero, Salvatore Garofalo and Alessia Cerrina, et al "Skills comparison in pediatric residents using a 2-dimensional vs. a 3-dimensional high-definition camera in a pediatric laparoscopic simulator." J Surg Educ 74 (2017): 644-649.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Cheng, Ji, Jinbo Gao, Xiaoming Shuai and Guobin Wang, et al "Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional laparoscopy in surgical efficacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis." Oncotarget 7 43 (2016): 70979.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Usta, Taner A., Aysel Ozkaynak, Ebru Kovalak and Erdinc Ergul. et al "An assessment of the new generation three-dimensional high definition laparoscopic vision system on surgical skills: A randomized prospective study." Surg. Endosc 29 (2015): 2305-2313.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at