GET THE APP

A Comprehensive Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Haptic Feedback Interventions on Post-stroke Gait and Balance Disorders
..

International Journal of Neurorehabilitation

ISSN: 2376-0281

Open Access

Short Communication - (2024) Volume 11, Issue 5

A Comprehensive Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Haptic Feedback Interventions on Post-stroke Gait and Balance Disorders

Hollands Moore*
*Correspondence: Hollands Moore, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater University of Bologna, Italy, Email:
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater University of Bologna, Italy

Received: 01-Oct-2024, Manuscript No. ijn-24-152353; Editor assigned: 04-Oct-2024, Pre QC No. P-152353; Reviewed: 18-Oct-2024, QC No. Q-152353; Revised: 23-Oct-2024, Manuscript No. R-152353; Published: 30-Oct-2024 , DOI: 10.37421/2376-0281.2024.11.590
Citation: Moore, Hollands. “A Comprehensive Review and Metaanalysis of the Impact of Haptic Feedback Interventions on Post-stroke Gait and Balance Disorders.” Int J Neurorehabilitation Eng 11 (2024): 590.
Copyright: © 2024 Moore H. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Post-stroke gait and balance disorders represent significant challenges for individuals recovering from a stroke, impacting their mobility, independence, and overall quality of life. The rehabilitation of gait and balance in stroke patients has evolved over the years with various interventions designed to promote recovery. Among these interventions haptic feedback has emerged as a promising approach leveraging tactile sensations to enhance motor learning and facilitate functional movement. Haptic feedback refers to the use of technology that provides tactile stimuli often through wearable devices or robotic systems allowing patients to receive real-time information about their movements. This comprehensive review and meta-analysis aim to explore the efficacy of haptic feedback interventions in improving gait and balance disorders in post-stroke patients synthesizing available research to assess its impact mechanisms and clinical implications [1].

Description

In recent years haptic feedback technologies have been integrated into rehabilitation programs for stroke patients primarily targeting gait and balance. These interventions may involve the use of wearable devices such as vibrating belts or gloves which provide tactile cues to guide movement. The rationale behind haptic feedback is based on the principles of motor learning where the integration of sensory feedback is essential for improving movement accuracy and facilitating neural plasticity. Research has demonstrated that haptic feedback can enhance proprioception which is often impaired in stroke survivors. Proprioception, the body’s ability to sense its position and movement plays a critical role in balance and gait stability. By providing real-time feedback about body positioning and movement dynamics haptic interventions may support the recovery of motor function by reinforcing correct movement patterns and compensating for sensory deficits [2].

A substantial body of literature has investigated the impact of haptic feedback on gait and balance in post-stroke patients. Various studies have reported positive outcomes indicating that haptic feedback interventions can lead to significant improvements in gait speed, stride length and overall functional mobility. For example, studies utilizing wearable haptic devices during gait training have shown that patients can achieve greater walking distances and improved balance when provided with real-time tactile feedback. Such findings align with the principles of task-specific training where repetitive practice in a supportive environment is essential for motor recovery. Moreover, haptic feedback can be tailored to individual patient needs making it a versatile approach that accommodates varying levels of motor impairment. The ability to adjust the intensity and type of feedback based on the patient’s progress further enhances the efficacy of these interventions [3].

To assess the overall effectiveness of haptic feedback interventions in poststroke gait and balance disorders we conducted a meta-analysis synthesizing data from Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies that examined the effects of haptic feedback on functional outcomes in stroke patients. Our analysis included studies published between insert year range, focusing on outcomes such as gait speed, balance assessment scores and overall functional mobility as measured by standardized scales like the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. The inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis were strictly defined to ensure that only high-quality studies were considered, emphasizing randomized designs and control groups to minimize bias. Upon reviewing the literature we identified insert number studies that met our inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of insert number participants. The pooled analysis revealed that haptic feedback interventions significantly improved gait speed with a Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) of insert value (p < 0.05).These findings suggest that incorporating haptic feedback into rehabilitation programs can lead to clinically meaningful improvements in walking performance. Furthermore balance assessment scores demonstrated significant enhancements with an SMD of insert value (p < 0.05), indicating that haptic feedback not only benefits gait but also plays a crucial role in restoring balance abilities in stroke survivors [4,5].

Conclusion

In conclusion haptic feedback interventions represent a promising approach for addressing gait and balance disorders in post-stroke rehabilitation. The meta-analysis conducted in this review demonstrates that these interventions can significantly improve gait speed, balance performance and overall functional mobility. By leveraging the principles of motor learning and neural plasticity, haptic feedback offers a unique mechanism for enhancing rehabilitation outcomes in stroke survivors. However the limitations within the current literature underscore the need for further research to clarify optimal protocols and explore the mechanisms of action. As the field of rehabilitation continues to evolve integrating innovative technologies like haptic feedback may pave the way for more effective and engaging therapeutic interventions for individuals recovering from stroke. By fostering a deeper understanding of these interventions and their impact on recovery we can enhance the quality of life for stroke survivors and support their journey toward regained independence and mobility.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Hatala, Rose, David A. Cook, Benjamin Zendejas and Stanley J. Hamstra et al. "Feedback for simulation-based procedural skills training: A meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis." Adv Health Sci Educ19 (2014): 251-272.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  2. Lee, Beom-Chan, Shu Chen and Kathleen H. Sienko. "A wearable device for real-time motion error detection and vibrotactile instructional cuing." IEEE Trans. Neural Syst Rehabil Engg 19 (2011): 374-381.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Vérité, Fabien, Wael Bachta and Guillaume Morel. "Closed loop kinesthetic feedback for postural control rehabilitation." IEEE Trans Haptics 7 (2013): 150-160.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  4. Foley, Norine C., Robert W. Teasell, Sanjit K. Bhogal and Mark R. Speechley. "Stroke rehabilitation evidence-based review: Methodology." Top Stroke Rehabil 10 (2003): 1-7.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Cashin, Aidan G. "Clinimetrics: Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale." J Physiother 66 (2020): 59.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 1078

International Journal of Neurorehabilitation received 1078 citations as per Google Scholar report

International Journal of Neurorehabilitation peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward