A Systematic Review of Brain Plasticity in Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries

Calderens Corallo^*
*Correspondence: Calderens Corallo, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy, Email:

Keywords

Spinal • Crucial • Brain • Rehabilitation

Introduction

These injuries can lead to varying degrees of paralysis, sensory impairment, and autonomic dysfunction, profoundly impacting the quality of life and independence of those affected. Traditionally, the focus of research and rehabilitation has been primarily on the spinal cord itself and its potential for regeneration and functional recovery. However, in recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the critical role played by the brain in the recovery process following SCI. Brain plasticity, also known as neuroplasticity, refers to the brain's ability to reorganize and adapt in response to new experiences, learning, and injury. While initially studied in the context of developmental processes and learning, researchers have increasingly recognized its significance in the context of neurological rehabilitation, including spinal cord injuries. The concept of brain plasticity challenges the traditional view of the brain as a static and unchanging organ, suggesting instead that it possesses remarkable adaptive capabilities even in the face of significant injury [1].

Understanding the mechanisms underlying brain plasticity in SCI patients is crucial for developing more effective rehabilitation strategies aimed at optimizing functional recovery. By harnessing the brain's inherent plasticity, researchers and clinicians can potentially enhance motor, sensory, and autonomic outcomes in individuals with spinal cord injuries. This systematic review aims to critically examine existing literature on brain plasticity in SCI patients, synthesizing current knowledge on its mechanisms, implications for recovery, and therapeutic interventions.

Literature Review

The included studies varied in terms of study design, participant characteristics, and outcome measures. The majority of studies employed neuroimaging techniques such as Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) to investigate brain plasticity following spinal cord injury. Some studies utilized Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) or Electroencephalography (EEG) to assess changes in cortical excitability and neural activity. Participants in the included studies ranged from acute to chronic stages of spinal cord injury, with varying levels and severity of injury. Most studies focused on patients with motor complete or incomplete injuries at different spinal cord levels, including cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions [2-4].

The mechanisms underlying brain plasticity in spinal cord injury are complex and multifaceted, involving structural, functional, and neurochemical changes within the central nervous system. Neuroimaging studies have consistently demonstrated evidence of cortical reorganization following spinal cord injury, with shifts in activation patterns and recruitment of alternative neural pathways. These changes are thought to reflect adaptive responses to compensate for impaired sensorimotor function and promote recovery of motor and sensory abilities. Alterations in neurotransmitter levels, particularly within the descending motor pathways, have been implicated in mediating plastic changes in the brain following spinal cord injury. Dysregulation of neurotransmitter systems such as dopamine, serotonin, and glutamate may influence synaptic plasticity and neural circuitry reorganization.

Discussion

Beyond functional changes, structural remodeling of the brain has also been observed in SCI patients, including alterations in gray and white matter integrity, cortical thickness, and connectivity. These structural changes may underlie adaptive plasticity mechanisms and contribute to functional recovery over time. In addition to within-modality reorganization, cross-modal plasticity involving recruitment of non-primary sensory and motor areas has been documented in SCI patients [5,6]. For example, visual and auditory cortical regions may undergo adaptive changes to compensate for loss of somatosensory input or motor function. Understanding the mechanisms of brain plasticity in spinal cord injury has important implications for designing and implementing rehabilitation interventions aimed at promoting recovery. Intensive, task-specific training programs targeting residual motor and sensory functions have shown promise in promoting neural plasticity and functional recovery in SCI patients. These interventions often involve repetitive practice of functional tasks coupled with sensory stimulation to facilitate neural reorganization and sensorimotor learning. Techniques such as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) have been investigated as adjunctive therapies to promote cortical plasticity and enhance motor function in SCI patients. By modulating cortical excitability and synaptic transmission, these techniques may facilitate recovery of motor control and reduce disability [7].

Conclusion

In conclusion, brain plasticity plays a fundamental role in the recovery process following spinal cord injury, offering new insights into potential targets for rehabilitation interventions. By harnessing the brain's adaptive capabilities, researchers and clinicians can develop innovative strategies to promote functional recovery, enhance quality of life, and restore independence in individuals with spinal cord injuries. Continued investment in research aimed at understanding the mechanisms of brain plasticity and translating these findings into effective clinical interventions is essential for advancing the field of spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Rabchevsky, Alexander G. and Patrick H. Kitzman. "Latest approaches for the treatment of spasticity and autonomic dysreflexia in chronic spinal cord injury."Neurotherapeutics8 (2011): 274-282.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Hiersemenzel, Lutz-Peter, Armin Curt and Volker Dietz. "From spinal shock to spasticity: Neuronal adaptations to a spinal cord injury."Neurology54 (2000): 1574-1582.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Basbaum, A. I. and P. D. Wall. "Chronic changes in the response of cells in adult cat dorsal horn following partial deafferentation: The appearance of responding cells in a previously nonresponsive region."Brain Res 116 (1976): 181-204.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Fawcett, J. "Repair of spinal cord injuries: Where are we, where are we going?."Spinal cord40 (2002): 615-623.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Fouad, Karim and Arthur Tse. "Adaptive changes in the injured spinal cord and their role in promoting functional recovery."Neurol Res 30 (2008): 17-27.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Liu, Chan-Nao and W. W. Chambers. "Intraspinal sprouting of dorsal root axons: Development of new collaterals and preterminals following partial denervation of the spinal cord in the cat."AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry79 (1958): 46-61.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

7. Carp, Jonathan S. and Jonathan R. Wolpaw. "Motoneuron plasticity underlying operantly conditioned decrease in primate H-reflex."J Neurophysiol72 (1994): 431-442.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at