Adolescents in Minority Cohorts: Comparing Characteristics with and without Family History of Substance Use Disorder

Cukie Mathareroopi^*
*Correspondence: Cukie Mathareroopi, Department of Psychiatry, University of Macerata, 62100 Macerata, Italy, Email:

Introduction

Adolescence marks a crucial developmental period characterized by myriad challenges and opportunities. For adolescents belonging to minority cohorts, navigating this phase comes with unique circumstances and pressures. Among the various factors influencing adolescent development, the presence of a family history of Substance Use Disorder (SUD) casts a significant shadow, impacting their trajectories in multifaceted ways. Understanding the interplay between minority status and familial SUD history is paramount in elucidating the complexities of adolescent behavior, health outcomes and interventions. This study delves into the nuanced dynamics shaping the lives of adolescents within minority cohorts, comparing those with and without a family history of SUD. By examining their characteristics, risk factors and protective factors, we aim to uncover insights crucial for tailored interventions and support systems. Through a comprehensive exploration of literature and empirical evidence, this research seeks to illuminate the intersections of minority status and familial SUD history, shedding light on avenues for promoting resilience and well-being among vulnerable adolescent populations [1,2].

Description

Adolescent development unfolds within a multifaceted ecosystem comprising familial, social, cultural and environmental influences. For minority adolescents, these factors intersect with unique challenges stemming from systemic inequalities, discrimination and marginalization. Concurrently, the presence of a family history of SUD adds another layer of complexity, predisposing individuals to heightened vulnerability to substance misuse and related behavioral health issues. The characteristics of adolescents within minority cohorts, particularly those with a family history of SUD, exhibit a myriad of dimensions. Psychosocial factors such as familial dynamics, socioeconomic status, acculturation stress and community support play pivotal roles in shaping their developmental trajectories. Moreover, cultural identity, language proficiency and access to culturally competent services profoundly influence their coping mechanisms and help-seeking behaviors [3,4].

Comparatively, adolescents without a family history of SUD within minority cohorts may exhibit differential patterns in risk and protective factors. Resilience factors such as strong social support networks, positive peer influences and engagement in cultural practices may mitigate the impact of minority stressors and familial vulnerabilities. However, contextual disparities in resource allocation, systemic barriers to healthcare and stigma surrounding mental health can impede their access to timely interventions and support services. In examining the characteristics of these two groups, it is essential to adopt an intersectional lens that acknowledges the intersecting identities and experiences shaping their lived realities. Factors such as gender, sexual orientation, immigration status and religious affiliation further modulate the interactions between minority status and familial SUD history, necessitating a nuanced approach to research and intervention design [5].

Conclusion

The intersection of minority status and familial SUD history underscores the complexity of adolescent development and underscores the need for multifaceted interventions tailored to diverse cultural contexts. By comparing the characteristics of adolescents within minority cohorts with and without a family history of SUD, this research highlights the heterogeneity of experiences and risk profiles within these populations. Moving forward, addressing the needs of adolescents from minority cohorts necessitates a comprehensive approach that integrates cultural competence, traumainformed care and community engagement. Empowering adolescents with coping skills, fostering resilience and dismantling systemic barriers to access are paramount in promoting their well-being and mitigating the adverse effects of familial SUD history. Moreover, investing in preventive interventions, early detection and integrated care models can mitigate the intergenerational transmission of SUD and break the cycle of vulnerability among minority populations. By prioritizing equity, inclusivity and social justice in policy and practice, we can foster environments conducive to the holistic development of adolescents within minority cohorts, ensuring that every young person has the opportunity to thrive and fulfill their potential.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest by author.

References

1. Merikangas, Kathleen R., Marilyn Stolar, Denise E. Stevens and Joseph Goulet, et al. "Familial transmission of substance use disorders." Arch Gen Psychiatry 55 (1998): 973-979.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Tyrfingsson, Thorarinn, Thorgeir E. Thorgeirsson, Frank Geller and Valgerdur Runarsdóttir, et al. "Addictions and their familiality in Iceland." Ann N Y Acad Sci 1187 (2010): 208-217.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Kendler, Kenneth S., Henrik Ohlsson, Jan Sundquist and Kristina Sundquist. "Triparental families: A new genetic-epidemiological design applied to drug abuse, alcohol use disorders and criminal behavior in a Swedish national sample." Am J Psychiatry 172 (2015): 553-560.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Yu, Cassie and Jon McClellan. "Genetics of substance use disorders." Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N 25 (2016): 377-385.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Bjork, James M., Lisa K. Straub, Rosellen G. Provost and Michael C. Neale. "The ABCD study of neurodevelopment: Identifying neurocircuit targets for prevention and treatment of adolescent substance abuse." Curr Treat Options Psychiatry 4 (2017): 196-209.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at