Advancements in Molecular Pathology: A Review of Novel Biomarkers in Surgical Oncology

Joseph Leegant^*
*Correspondence: Joseph Leegant, Department of Surgical Oncology, Brandon University, 270 18th St, Brandon, MB R7A 6A9, Canada, Email:

Keywords

Pituitarygland • Surgical oncology • Pathology • Biomarkers

Introduction

The integration of molecular pathology into surgical oncology has transformed the clinical management of cancer. Molecular biomarkers, which include genetic, epigenetic, proteomic and metabolomic indicators, provide valuable information beyond traditional histopathological assessments. These biomarkers aid in early cancer detection, prognostication and the personalization of treatment strategies, thus playing a pivotal role in precision medicine. This review examines the latest advancements in molecular pathology, highlighting novel biomarkers that are shaping the future of surgical oncology.

Literature Review

Genetic biomarkers

Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized molecular pathology and surgical oncology by enabling comprehensive genomic profiling of tumors. This technology allows for the rapid sequencing of large amounts of DNA, providing detailed insights into the genetic alterations that drive cancer. NGS has significantly advanced our understanding of cancer biology, facilitated the discovery of novel biomarkers and informed the development of targeted therapies [1].

NGS involves several key steps:

1. Library preparation: DNA is extracted from a biological sample (e.g., tumor tissue, blood) and fragmented into smaller pieces. Adaptors are then added to the ends of these fragments to create a sequencing library.
2. Sequencing: The prepared library is loaded onto a sequencing platform, where each fragment is amplified and sequenced in parallel. Common sequencing platforms include Illumina, Ion Torrent and PacBio.
3. Data analysis: The generated sequences are aligned to a reference genome and bioinformatics tools are used to identify genetic variations, such as single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions and deletions (indels), copy number variations (CNVs) and structural variations (SVs).
4. Interpretation: The identified genetic alterations are interpreted in the context of cancer biology to provide clinically relevant information.

Applications in surgical oncology

NGS allows for the comprehensive profiling of tumor genomes, revealing the genetic landscape of individual cancers. This information is critical for precision medicine, where treatment decisions are tailored to the genetic profile of the tumor [2].

• Actionable mutations: NGS can identify mutations in genes such as EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and ALK, which are targets for specific therapies in cancers like lung, colorectal and melanoma.
• Resistance mutations: NGS can detect mutations that confer resistance to targeted therapies, enabling clinicians to adjust treatment plans accordingly.

ctDNA analysis represents a non-invasive method for monitoring tumor dynamics and detecting minimal residual disease. Liquid biopsies, which analyze ctDNA from blood samples, have shown promise in early cancer detection and monitoring therapeutic responses. Assays such as Guardant360 and Signatera have been developed to provide real-time insights into tumor evolution and treatment efficacy [3].

Epigenetic biomarkers

Aberrant DNA methylation patterns are hallmark features of cancer and can serve as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) and bisulfite sequencing are techniques used to identify methylation changes in genes such as MGMT in glioblastomas and BRCA1 in breast cancer. The FDA-approved Epi proColon test, which detects methylated SEPT9 in blood, exemplifies the clinical utility of DNA methylation biomarkers.

Alterations in histone acetylation and methylation have been implicated in cancer development and progression. These modifications influence gene expression and chromatin structure, providing potential therapeutic targets. Inhibitors of histone deacetylases (HDACs) and histone methyltransferases (HMTs) are being explored in clinical trials, underscoring the relevance of histone modifications as biomarkers and therapeutic targets [4].

Proteomic biomarkers

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics is a powerful analytical approach that has revolutionized the field of molecular pathology, particularly in the context of surgical oncology. This technique enables the comprehensive identification, quantification and characterization of proteins within complex biological samples, providing critical insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying cancer. Advances in MS-based proteomics have led to the discovery of novel protein biomarkers, facilitating early cancer detection, prognostication and the development of targeted therapies [5].

Mass spectrometry measures the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of ionized molecules, allowing for the identification and quantification of proteins and peptides. The key steps in MS-based proteomics include:

1. Sample preparation: Proteins are extracted from biological samples (e.g., tissues, blood) and digested into peptides using proteolytic enzymes like trypsin.
2. Ionization: Peptides are ionized using techniques such as electrospray ionization (ESI) or matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI), converting them into charged particles.
3. Mass analysis: Ionized peptides are separated based on their m/z ratio using a mass analyzer (e.g., time-of-flight, quadrupole, orbitrap).
4. Detection and quantification: The separated ions are detected and their abundance is quantified. Tandem MS (MS/MS) provides structural information by fragmenting the peptides and analyzing the resulting product ions.
5. Data analysis: The acquired spectra are compared against protein databases to identify and quantify the proteins present in the sample [6].

Applications in surgical oncology

1. Biomarker discovery

MS-based proteomics has been instrumental in identifying protein biomarkers associated with various cancers. These biomarkers can serve as diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive indicators, aiding in personalized cancer management.

• Diagnostic biomarkers: Proteins such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for prostate cancer and CA-125 for ovarian cancer have been identified using MS-based proteomics, facilitating early detection.
• Prognostic biomarkers: Protein expression profiles can predict disease outcomes. For example, elevated levels of HER2/neu in breast cancer are associated with aggressive disease and poor prognosis.
• Predictive biomarkers: Proteomic analysis can identify biomarkers that predict response to therapy. The detection of PD-L1 expression in tumors guides the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

2. Therapeutic target identification

MS-based proteomics helps identify potential therapeutic targets by elucidating the molecular pathways involved in cancer progression. For instance, the overexpression of kinases in certain cancers has led to the development of kinase inhibitors as targeted therapies.

3. Mechanistic insights

Proteomic profiling provides insights into the molecular mechanisms driving cancer. By analyzing protein networks and pathways, researchers can better understand tumor biology, metastasis and resistance to therapy.

4. Clinical applications and future directions

The clinical implementation of MS-based proteomics holds promise for improving cancer care. Key applications and future directions include:

• Personalized medicine: Proteomic profiles can guide the selection of targeted therapies, ensuring that patients receive the most effective treatment based on their molecular characteristics.
• Early detection: MS-based proteomics can identify protein biomarkers in blood or other bodily fluids, enabling non-invasive early cancer detection.
• Therapeutic monitoring: Dynamic changes in protein expression during treatment can be monitored to assess therapeutic efficacy and adjust treatment plans accordingly.
• Multi-omics integration: Combining proteomic data with genomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic information can provide a comprehensive understanding of cancer, leading to the discovery of new biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
• Technological advancements: Continuous improvements in MS technology, such as higher resolution and sensitivity, will enhance the detection and quantification of low-abundance proteins, expanding the utility of proteomics in oncology.

Discussion

Immunoassays

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) are widely used to detect protein biomarkers in clinical samples. IHC detection of PD-L1 expression, for instance, guides the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in various cancers. ELISA-based tests for proteins like CA-125 in ovarian cancer and AFP in hepatocellular carcinoma are also crucial for disease monitoring and management.

Metabolomic biomarkers

Metabolomics, the comprehensive analysis of metabolites within biological systems, offers valuable insights into the metabolic alterations associated with cancer. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and mass spectrometry (MS) are two pivotal technologies driving advancements in this field. These techniques have enabled the identification and quantification of small molecules, enhancing our understanding of cancer metabolism and facilitating the discovery of novel biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic monitoring.

NMR spectroscopy leverages the magnetic properties of atomic nuclei to elucidate the structure, dynamics and interactions of metabolites. It is a non-destructive and highly reproducible technique that provides detailed information about the chemical environment of metabolites. Key features of NMR spectroscopy in metabolomics include:

1. Quantitative analysis: NMR allows for the absolute quantification of metabolites without the need for external standards. This is particularly useful for comparing metabolite concentrations across different samples.
2. Structural elucidation: NMR provides detailed structural information, enabling the identification of novel metabolites and the characterization of metabolic pathways.
3. Non-destructive nature: The non-destructive nature of NMR allows for repeated measurements and the preservation of samples for further analysis.

Applications in cancer metabolomics:

• Lactate and alanine: Elevated levels of lactate and alanine, detected by NMR, are indicative of altered glycolysis and alanine transaminase activity in cancer cells, reflecting the Warburg effect.
• Choline-containing compounds: Increased choline metabolites, such as phosphocholine and glycerophosphocholine, are markers of cell membrane turnover and malignancy.

Mass spectrometry is a highly sensitive analytical technique that measures the mass-to-charge ratio of ions. It enables the detection and quantification of a wide range of metabolites, often with greater sensitivity and specificity than NMR. Key features of MS in metabolomics include:

1. High sensitivity: MS can detect metabolites at very low concentrations, making it suitable for identifying biomarkers present in minute amounts.
2. Comprehensive coverage: MS can analyze a broad spectrum of metabolites, including lipids, amino acids and nucleotides, providing a comprehensive metabolic profile.
3. Quantitative capabilities: MS, coupled with appropriate standards and calibration curves, allows for the accurate quantification of metabolites.

• Glutamine and glutamate: Altered levels of glutamine and glutamate, detected by MS, reflect changes in amino acid metabolism and are associated with cancer cell proliferation and survival.
• TCA cycle intermediates: MS profiling of tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediates, such as citrate and succinate, provides insights into mitochondrial function and metabolic reprogramming in cancer cells.

Clinical applications and future directions

The incorporation of novel biomarkers into clinical practice has revolutionized the field of surgical oncology. Personalized treatment strategies, driven by molecular insights, have improved patient outcomes and reduced adverse effects. However, challenges such as biomarker validation, standardization of testing methods and integration into clinical workflows remain. Future research should focus on multi-omic approaches, combining genomic, epigenetic, proteomic and metabolomic data to achieve a holistic understanding of cancer biology. Additionally, advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning hold promise for the development of predictive models and decision-support tools, further enhancing the clinical utility of molecular biomarkers.

Conclusion

Advancements in molecular pathology have significantly impacted surgical oncology, with novel biomarkers offering unprecedented precision in cancer diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. The continuous evolution of molecular techniques and biomarker discovery will undoubtedly lead to more refined and effective cancer management strategies. As we move towards a future of personalized medicine, the integration of molecular pathology into surgical oncology will remain a cornerstone of innovative and patient-centered cancer care.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Ashkan, Keyoumars, Josephine Jung, Alexandra Maria Velicu and Ahmed Raslan, et al. "Neurosurgery and coronavirus: Impact and challenges—lessons learnt from the first wave of a global pandemic."Acta Neurochir 163 (2021): 317-329.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Bajunaid, Khalid, Ashwag Alqurashi, Abdullah Alatar and Mohammad Alkutbi, et al. "Neurosurgical procedures and safety during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case-control multicenter study."World Neurosurg 143 (2020): e179-e187.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Chibbaro, S., M. Ganau, J. Todeschi and F. Proust, et al. "How SARS-CoV-2 is forcing us to reconsider and reorganize our daily neurosurgical practice."Neurochir 66 (2020): 189-191.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Balak, Naci, Deniz Inan, Mario Ganau and Cesare Zoia, et al. "A simple mathematical tool to forecast COVID-19 cumulative case numbers."Clin Epidemiol Glob Health 12 (2021): 100853.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Burke, John F., Andrew K. Chan, Valli Mummaneni and Dean Chou, et al. "The coronavirus disease 2019 global pandemic: A neurosurgical treatment algorithm."Neurosurg 87 (2020): E50-E56.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. COVIDSurg Collaborative, GlobalSurg Collaborative, Dmitri Nepogodiev and Joana FF Simoes, et al. "Effects of pre‐operative isolation on postoperative pulmonary complications after elective surgery: An international prospective cohort study."Anaesthesia76 (2021): 1454-1464.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at