Advancements in Turbulence Modeling for Predicting Flow Behavior in Complex Environments

Maasooma Akra^*
*Correspondence: Maasooma Akra, Department of Mathematics, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan, Email:

Introduction

Fluid flow plays a fundamental role in various natural and industrial processes, from weather patterns and ocean currents to the behavior of fluids in aircraft engines and pipelines. Understanding and accurately predicting fluid flow behavior, especially in complex environments, is crucial for optimizing designs, improving efficiency, and ensuring safety in a wide range of applications. Turbulence modeling, a branch of fluid dynamics, has seen significant advancements in recent years, enabling researchers and engineers to better predict and simulate flow behavior in complex environments. In this article, we will explore some of these advancements and their implications for various fields. Turbulence is a state of fluid flow characterized by chaotic and irregular motion. It is ubiquitous in nature and can be found in phenomena such as river currents, atmospheric dynamics, and the wake behind an aircraft. Turbulence is also encountered in industrial processes like combustion, mixing, and heat transfer in pipelines. Understanding and predicting turbulence is challenging due to its complex nature, and turbulence modeling is the primary tool used to tackle this challenge [1].

Description

Traditionally, turbulence modeling relied on empirical or semi-empirical approaches to describe turbulent flows. These models were often based on simplified assumptions and provided limited accuracy, especially in complex environments. RANS models average the flow properties over time, resulting in a time-averaged flow description. While they are computationally less expensive than other methods, they often struggle to capture unsteady or complex flow features. LES divides turbulent flows into large-scale and small-scale motions. It models the large scales explicitly and approximates the small scales. LES is computationally more expensive than RANS but provides better accuracy for complex flows. DNS solves the full Navier-Stokes equations without turbulence modeling. While it offers the highest level of accuracy, it is computationally prohibitive for most practical applications due to its high cost [2,3].

While these traditional models have been valuable tools for decades, they have limitations when it comes to predicting turbulence behavior in complex environments where a wide range of length and time scales are involved. Hence, researchers have been working on advancements in turbulence modeling to overcome these limitations. One of the most significant advancements in turbulence modeling is the integration of machine learning and data-driven approaches. Machine learning algorithms, such as artificial neural networks, have been used to improve the accuracy of turbulence predictions by learning from vast datasets. Researchers have developed neural network-based models to predict turbulence properties, such as eddy viscosity, in real-time. These models can adapt to complex flow situations and provide more accurate predictions than traditional models. Scale-Resolving Simulations (SRS) aim to bridge the gap between RANS and LES models by explicitly modeling a range of turbulence scales. These models are computationally more efficient than DNS but offer better accuracy than RANS for complex flows. They are particularly useful in situations where both large and small turbulence scales play a significant role, such as in turbulent boundary layers and flow around complex geometries [4,5].

Hybrid turbulence models combine elements of different modeling approaches to leverage their respective strengths. For example, researchers have developed models that use RANS near solid walls and LES or SRS in the outer flow regions. These hybrid models provide accurate predictions in complex flows while minimizing computational costs, making them suitable for engineering applications. The advancement of high-performance computing has revolutionized turbulence modeling. With access to powerful supercomputers and efficient algorithms, researchers can now perform simulations with unprecedented levels of detail and accuracy. This has allowed for the exploration of turbulence in complex environments, such as turbulent combustion in internal combustion engines or the behavior of turbulent flows in urban environments.

Conclusion

Advancements in turbulence modeling have revolutionized our ability to predict and understand fluid flow behavior in complex environments. These developments have far-reaching implications for industries ranging from aerospace and energy production to environmental science and urban planning. With ongoing research and technological progress, turbulence modeling will continue to evolve, providing increasingly accurate and practical solutions for a wide range of applications. As our understanding of turbulence deepens, so too will our ability to harness its power for the benefit of society and the environment.

Quantifying uncertainty in turbulence predictions is essential for engineering applications. Researchers are developing methods to estimate and manage uncertainty in turbulence modeling results. Advancements in turbulence modeling have revolutionized our ability to predict flow behavior in complex environments. These models have wide-ranging applications in engineering, environmental science and many other fields. As researchers continue to refine existing models and explore new approaches, our understanding of turbulence and its impact on the world around us will only deepen, leading to more efficient and sustainable technologies and solutions.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest by author.

References

1. Karimi, Alireza, Reza Razaghi, Seyed Mohammadali Rahmati and J. Crawford Downs, et al. "The effect of intraocular pressure load boundary on the biomechanics of the human conventional aqueous outflow pathway." Bioeng 9 (2022): 672.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Rahmati, Seyed Mohammadali, Reza Razaghi and Alireza Karimi. "Biomechanics of the keratoconic cornea: Theory, segmentation, pressure distribution and coupled FE-optimization algorithm." J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 113 (2021): 104155.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Eilaghi, Armin, John G. Flanagan, Inka Tertinegg and Craig A. Simmons, et al. "Biaxial mechanical testing of human sclera." J Biomech 43 (2010): 1696-1701.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Razaghi, Reza, Hasan Biglari and Alireza Karimi. "Risk of rupture of the cerebral aneurysm in relation to traumatic brain injury using a patient-specific fluid-structure interaction model." Comput Methods Programs Biomed 176 (2019): 9-16.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Karimi, Alireza, Rafael Grytz, Seyed Mohammadali Rahmati and Christopher A. Girkin, et al. "Analysis of the effects of finite element type within a 3D biomechanical model of a human optic nerve head and posterior pole." Comput Methods Programs Biomed 198 (2021): 105794.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at