GET THE APP

Advancing Resuscitation: A Clinical Review of Point-Of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in Adult Cardiac Arrest
..

Journal of Forensic Research

ISSN: 2157-7145

Open Access

Short Communication - (2024) Volume 15, Issue 1

Advancing Resuscitation: A Clinical Review of Point-Of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in Adult Cardiac Arrest

Milroy Zieger*
*Correspondence: Milroy Zieger, Department of Forensic and Investigative Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK, Email:
Department of Forensic and Investigative Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK

Received: 24-Dec-2024, Manuscript No. jfr-23-129349; Editor assigned: 26-Dec-2024, Pre QC No. P-129349; Reviewed: 08-Feb-2024, QC No. Q-129349; Revised: 14-Feb-2024, Manuscript No. R-129349; Published: 24-Feb-2024 , DOI: 10.37421/2157-7145.2024.15.600
Citation: Zieger, Milroy. “Advancing Resuscitation: A Clinical Review of Point-Of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in Adult Cardiac Arrest.” J Forensic Res 15 (2024): 600.
Copyright: © 2024 Zieger M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Cardiac arrest remains a significant public health challenge, with high mortality rates despite advances in resuscitation techniques. In recent years, there has been growing interest in the use of Point-Of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) as an adjunctive tool in the management of cardiac arrest. POCUS allows for rapid assessment of cardiac function, identification of reversible causes, and real-time guidance during resuscitative efforts. This article aims to review the current evidence on the role of POCUS in adult cardiac arrest and its implications for clinical practice. Point-Of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as a valuable tool in the management of cardiac arrest, offering real-time visualization and diagnostic insights at the bedside. This article provides a comprehensive review of the role of POCUS in adult cardiac arrest, including its applications, benefits, limitations, and future directions. By integrating POCUS into the resuscitation algorithm, healthcare providers can enhance decision-making, improve patient outcomes, and ultimately save lives [1].

Description

POCUS enables clinicians to assess cardiac activity, including ventricular contractility, valvular function, and pericardial effusion, which can guide resuscitative interventions such as chest compressions and vasopressor administration. POCUS helps identify potentially reversible causes of cardiac arrest, such as hypovolemia, tension pneumothorax, cardiac tamponade, and pulmonary embolism, allowing for targeted interventions to improve patient outcomes. POCUS assists in the evaluation of lung sliding, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, and endotracheal tube placement, optimizing airway management and ventilation strategies during cardiac arrest [2].

POCUS facilitates the visualization of peripheral veins and arteries, guiding the placement of intravenous lines and intraosseous access, essential for administering medications and fluids during resuscitation. POCUS aids in the detection of electrolyte abnormalities, such as hyperkalemia or hypokalemia, which can contribute to cardiac instability and arrest, prompting timely correction. POCUS provides immediate feedback on cardiac and pulmonary function, allowing clinicians to adapt resuscitative efforts dynamically based on the patient's response to interventions. POCUS facilitates the early identification of reversible causes of cardiac arrest, enabling prompt intervention and potentially improving the likelihood of successful resuscitation. By providing rapid diagnostic information at the bedside, POCUS reduces the time to diagnosis and treatment initiation, crucial in the time-sensitive management of cardiac arrest [3].

POCUS enhances the accuracy of clinical assessments by providing direct visualization of cardiac and pulmonary structures, reducing the reliance on clinical guesswork and improving diagnostic certainty. Proficiency in POCUS requires specialized training and experience, and the quality of imaging may vary depending on the operator's skill level, potentially limiting its utility in certain clinical settings. Access to ultrasound equipment may be limited in some healthcare settings, particularly in resource-constrained environments, restricting the widespread implementation of POCUS in cardiac arrest management. Performing POCUS during cardiac arrest necessitates brief interruptions in chest compressions, which may compromise perfusion and decrease the likelihood of successful resuscitation, emphasizing the need for efficient and coordinated teamwork [4].

Future advancements in POCUS technology may involve integration with automated devices, such as artificial intelligence algorithms, to enhance real-time interpretation and decision support during resuscitation.

Developing standardized training programs and certification pathways for POCUS proficiency can ensure consistent quality and competency among healthcare providers, promoting its widespread adoption and utilization in cardiac arrest management. Tele-ultrasound platforms enable remote guidance and consultation by expert sonographers, expanding access to POCUS expertise in underserved areas and facilitating real-time decision-making during cardiac arrest resuscitation [5].

Conclusion

Point-Of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) holds promise as a valuable adjunctive tool in the management of adult cardiac arrest, offering real-time visualization and diagnostic insights at the bedside. By integrating POCUS into the resuscitation algorithm, healthcare providers can enhance decision-making, improve patient outcomes, and ultimately save lives. Continued research, training, and technological advancements are essential to maximize the potential of POCUS in cardiac arrest management and improve survival rates in this critical patient population.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest by author.

References

  1. Subcommittee, A. T. L. S. and International ATLS Working Group. "Advanced trauma life support (ATLS®): The ninth edition.J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74 (2013): 1363-1366.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Gitto, Lorenzo, Serenella Serinelli, Francesco P. Busardò and Valeria Panebianco, et al. "Can post-mortem computed tomography be considered an alternative for autopsy in deaths due to hemopericardium?." J Geriatr Cardiol 11 (2014): 363.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Paul, Jonathan A. and Oliver PF Panzer. "Point-of-care ultrasound in cardiac arrest.Anesthesiology 135 (2021): 508-519.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Soar, Jasmeet, Jerry P. Nolan, Bernd W. Böttiger and Gavin D. Perkins, et al. "European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015: Section 3. Adult advanced life support.Resuscitation (2015): 100-147.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Rocca, Eduardo, Christian Zanza, Yaroslava Longhitano and Fabio Piccolella, et al. "Lung ultrasound in critical care and Emergency Medicine: Clinical review.Adv Respir Med 91 (2023): 203-223.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 2328

Journal of Forensic Research received 2328 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Forensic Research peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward