Aesthesiometry\'s Assessment of the Corneal Nerve: Its History, Progress and Prospects

Kyle Fardine^*
*Correspondence: Kyle Fardine, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA, Email:

Keywords

Aesthesiometry • Genetic • Species

Introduction

The earliest aesthesiometry methods used horsehair or cotton threads to manually touch the cornea, recording patient responses to these stimuli. These methods, while simple, lacked precision and standardization. The development of the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer in the 1960s marked a significant advancement. This device used a nylon monofilament of variable length to deliver controlled mechanical stimuli to the cornea. The length of the filament at which the patient could first perceive the stimulus was recorded as the corneal sensitivity threshold. The Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer provided more standardized and reproducible measurements compared to earlier methods. The integration of AI and machine learning algorithms with CCM and other imaging modalities has revolutionized corneal nerve assessment. These technologies enable automated analysis of nerve morphology and function, improving diagnostic accuracy and facilitating large-scale studies. The application of nanotechnology in aesthesiometry is an emerging field. Nanomaterials can be used to create more sensitive and precise devices for measuring corneal nerve function. For example, nanosensors integrated with contact lenses could continuously monitor corneal sensitivity and provide realtime data on nerve health [1,2].

Literature Review

The advent of advanced technology has significantly improved the precision and utility of aesthesiometry in assessing corneal nerve function. Non-contact methods, such as air puff aesthesiometry, were developed to eliminate the variability and potential discomfort associated with contact methods. These devices deliver controlled air puffs to the cornea and measure the sensory response. Non-contact aesthesiometry is advantageous for its reproducibility and reduced risk of corneal damage. In recent decades, corneal confocal microscopy has emerged as a powerful tool for assessing corneal nerve morphology and function. CCM provides high-resolution images of the corneal subbasal nerve plexus, allowing for detailed analysis of nerve density, tortuosity, and branching patterns. This imaging modality has enhanced our understanding of corneal nerve alterations in various diseases, including diabetic neuropathy, dry eye disease, and corneal dystrophies. Complementing objective measures, subjective assessments such as the OSDI questionnaire provide valuable insights into the patient's perception of ocular surface symptoms. Combining subjective and objective assessments offers a comprehensive evaluation of corneal nerve function and ocular surface health [3,4].

Discussion

Diabetes mellitus can cause peripheral neuropathy, including corneal nerve damage. Aesthesiometry, particularly CCM, has been instrumental in detecting early corneal nerve changes in diabetic patients, facilitating timely intervention and management. Dry eye disease is often associated with corneal nerve dysfunction. Aesthesiometry helps in assessing the severity of nerve impairment and guiding treatment strategies. Studies have shown that patients with dry eye disease exhibit reduced corneal sensitivity, which can be objectively measured using aesthesiometry. Herpes simplex virus infection can cause corneal nerve damage, leading to decreased corneal sensitivity and recurrent epithelial erosions. Aesthesiometry is essential for evaluating nerve function in herpetic keratitis and monitoring recovery following antiviral treatment. Corneal sensitivity can be affected by refractive surgeries such as LASIK and PRK. Aesthesiometry is used to assess nerve function pre- and postoperatively, helping to identify patients at risk for post-surgical complications such as neurotrophic keratopathy. Conditions that impair corneal innervation, such as trigeminal nerve damage, can lead to neurotrophic keratopathy. Aesthesiometry is crucial for diagnosing and managing this sight-threatening condition, guiding interventions such as nerve growth factor therapy. Recent technological advancements have further refined aesthesiometry techniques, improving accuracy and expanding clinical applications. QST methods, including thermoaesthesiometry and electroaesthesiometry, provide quantitative measurements of corneal nerve function. These techniques assess the corneal response to thermal and electrical stimuli, offering a more comprehensive evaluation of sensory nerve function [5,6].

Conclusion

Aesthesiometry has evolved significantly since its inception, from rudimentary mechanical tests to sophisticated imaging and quantitative sensory testing methods. The ability to accurately assess corneal nerve function is crucial for diagnosing and managing a wide range of ocular and systemic conditions. Recent advancements in technology, such as corneal confocal microscopy, artificial intelligence, and nanotechnology, have further enhanced the precision and utility of aesthesiometry. As we look to the future, the integration of personalized medicine, regenerative therapies, and telemedicine with aesthesiometry holds great promise for improving patient outcomes. By continuing to refine and innovate aesthesiometry techniques, we can advance our understanding of corneal nerve health and develop more effective strategies for preserving and restoring vision.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Swanevelder, Sarah K., Stuti L. Misra, Ellen F. Tyler and Charles NJ McGhee. "Precision, agreement and utility of a contemporary non‐contact corneal aesthesiometer." Clin Exp Optom 103 (2020): 798-803.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Nosch, Daniela S., Emanuele Käser, Tobias Bracher and Roland E. Joos. "Age-related changes in corneal sensitivity." Cornea 42 (2023): 1257-1262.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Feinberg, Konstantin, Kiana Tajdaran, Kaveh Mirmoeini and Simeon C. Daeschler, et al. "The role of sensory innervation in homeostatic and injury-induced corneal epithelial renewal." Int J Mol Sci 24 (2023): 12615.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Mirmoeini, Kaveh, Kiana Tajdaran, Jennifer Zhang and Tessa Gordon, et al. "Schwann cells are key regulators of corneal epithelial renewal." Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 64 (2023): 7-7.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Domeshek, Leahthan F., Daniel A. Hunter, Katherine Santos and Steven M. Couch, et al. "Anatomic characteristics of supraorbital and supratrochlear nerves relevant to their use in corneal neurotization." Eye 33 (2019): 398-403.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Liu, Jun and Zhijie Li. "Resident innate immune cells in the cornea." Frontiers in immunology 12 (2021): 620284.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at