After Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery, Functional Results and Self-reported Quality of Life in Patients with Facial Nerve Impairment

Brackmann Cullen^*
*Correspondence: Brackmann Cullen, Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiologya, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada, Email:

Introduction

Vestibular Schwannoma also known as acoustic neuroma is a benign tumor that develops on the vestibulocochlear nerve (CN VIII) which can lead to various symptoms including hearing loss, tinnitus and balance disturbances. Surgical intervention is often required to remove these tumors particularly when they cause significant symptoms or pose a risk of complications. However, vestibular Schwannoma surgery is not without risks the most notable being facial nerve impairment which can profoundly impact a patient's quality of life. This paper examines the functional outcomes and self-reported quality of life of patients who experience facial nerve impairment following vestibular Schwannoma surgery shedding light on the challenges they face and the strategies for rehabilitation and support. Facial nerve impairment is one of the most common complications following vestibular Schwannoma surgery. The facial nerve (CN VII) is responsible for the movement of facial muscles and plays a crucial role in expressions speech and even aspects of swallowing and taste. Injury to this nerve during surgery can result in weakness or paralysis of the facial muscles leading to an asymmetric appearance, difficulties in speech articulation and challenges in social interactions. Patients often report feelings of embarrassment frustration and emotional distress stemming from their altered appearance and functional limitations. The severity of facial nerve impairment can vary widely ranging from mild weakness to complete paralysis (known as House-Brackmann grade IV or V) with each grade associated with differing levels of functional deficits and implications for quality of life [1].

Description

Postoperative recovery from facial nerve impairment can be a lengthy process. Many patients experience gradual improvements in facial function over weeks to months following surgery but this recovery is not guaranteed and may not return to baseline levels. Studies have shown that a significant proportion of patients report persistent deficits even years after surgery. This chronic impairment can influence various domains of life including social relationships mental health and occupational functioning. The degree of recovery is influenced by numerous factors including the extent of nerve damage during surgery the patient’s age pre-existing health conditions and the type of surgical technique employed. Understanding these variables is essential in predicting outcomes and tailoring rehabilitation approaches [2].

Assessing the functional results of facial nerve recovery post-surgery involves a combination of clinical evaluations and patient-reported outcomes. Clinicians often use established scales such as the House-Brackmann scale to objectively grade facial function while self-reported questionnaires can capture the patient’s subjective experience. Instruments like the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) scale and the Facial Disability Index (FDI) have been developed to assess the impact of facial nerve impairment on quality of life. These tools evaluate aspects such as physical functioning social interactions and emotional well-being providing a comprehensive view of how facial nerve impairment affects patients’ lives. The impact of facial nerve impairment on quality of life is profound. Patients frequently report heightened levels of anxiety and depression following surgery correlating with their physical appearance and perceived loss of normalcy. The psychological burden can be exacerbated by social stigma and the challenges of re-engaging in social activities that may have been enjoyed prior to surgery. Self-reported quality of life scores often reflect these struggles with patients indicating lower levels of satisfaction in both personal and professional domains. Moreover the emotional distress associated with facial nerve impairment can lead to withdrawal from social situations further compounding feelings of isolation and sadness [3,4].

Furthermore the variability in individual recovery trajectories necessitates tailored approaches which may not always be feasible in standard rehabilitation settings. Therefore it is essential for healthcare providers to advocate for better access to interdisciplinary care for patients recovering from vestibular Schwannoma surgery. Building networks of support that include surgeon’s physical therapists, psychologists and social workers can facilitate comprehensive care ultimately enhancing patients' recovery experiences. Long-term studies investigating the outcomes of patients with facial nerve impairment following vestibular Schwannoma surgery provide valuable insights into recovery patterns. Research indicates that while some patients experience significant improvement over time others may continue to struggle with persistent deficits. Factors such as age preoperative facial function and the extent of tumor resection can significantly influence long-term outcomes. Younger patients often exhibit better recovery potential compared to older individuals suggesting that age-related neuroplasticity may play a role in rehabilitation success. Similarly patients with better preoperative facial function tend to have more favorable recovery trajectories, underscoring the importance of early intervention and postoperative care [5].

Conclusion

In conclusion, the aftermath of vestibular Schwannoma surgery presents significant challenges for patients experiencing facial nerve impairment. The impact of such impairment extends beyond physical function affecting emotional well-being and overall quality of life. Understanding the functional results and self-reported experiences of these patients is crucial for developing effective rehabilitation strategies and support systems. By integrating physical rehabilitation with psychological support promoting patient education and leveraging technology healthcare providers can enhance recovery outcomes and improve the quality of life for individuals navigating the complexities of post-surgical rehabilitation. Continued research is essential to refine therapeutic approaches identify predictors of recovery and ultimately provide patients with the best possible care following vestibular Schwannoma surgery.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict Of Interest

None.

References

1. Schwartz, Marc S., Gregory P. Lekovic, Mia E. Miller and William H. Slattery, et al. "Translabyrinthine microsurgical resection of small vestibular Schwannomas." J Neurosurg 129 (2017): 128-136.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Brackmann, Derald E. "Vestibular Schwannoma (acoustic neuroma)." Otolaryngol Clin N Am 45 (2012): xiii-xv.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. De Swart, Bert JM, Jolien CGE Verheij and Carien HG Beurskens. "Problems with eating and drinking in patients with unilateral peripheral facial paralysis." Dysphagia 18 (2003): 267-273.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Mehta, Ritvik P., Mara Wernick Robinson and Tessa A. Hadlock. "Validation of the synkinesis assessment questionnaire." Laryngoscope 117 (2007): 923-926.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Robinson, Mara Wernick and Jennifer Baiungo. "Facial rehabilitation: Evaluation and treatment strategies for the patient with facial palsy." Otolaryngol Clin N Am 51 (2018): 1151-1167.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at