GET THE APP

An International Public Health Crisis Human Monkey Pox
..

Journal of Global Economics

ISSN: 2375-4389

Open Access

Opinion - (2022) Volume 10, Issue 9

An International Public Health Crisis Human Monkey Pox

Priya Toth*
*Correspondence: Priya Toth, Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA, Email:
Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA

Received: 01-Sep-2022, Manuscript No. economics-22-84248; Editor assigned: 03-Sep-2022, Pre QC No. P-84248; Reviewed: 15-Sep-2022, QC No. Q-84248; Revised: 20-Sep-2022, Manuscript No. R-84248; Published: 27-Sep-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2375-4389.2022.10.373
Citation: Toth, Priya.“An International Public Health Crisis Human Monkey Pox.” J Glob Econ 10 (2022): 373.
Copyright: © 2022 Toth P. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Clinical symptoms of monkey pox, a viral zoonosis brought on by an orthopoxvirus; include fever, headache, lymphadenopathy, myalgia, rash and a number of serious, potentially fatal complications. Following a recent outbreak in non-endemic nations of Europe and the USA, monkey pox, which is endemic in some central and West African countries and in tropical regions close to the equator, gained attention. As a result, the World Health Organization declared monkey pox a global public health emergency due to its growing scope. After months of careful observation, western scientific research is now coming to the conclusion that African endemic countries represent a reserve pool able to feed, via travellers and sexual networks, the outbreak in non-endemic countries where high-risk communities like gay and bisexual men are the primary targets. Breaking the chain of spread of this epidemic requires early diagnosis and prevention through vaccination. A special focus should be placed on preventing the spread from endemic nations while also implementing financial investments in those nations' public health systems. However, assuming that specific treatments for this illness are still in the experimental stage, information campaigns and assistance to high-risk classes in non-endemic countries are significant priorities.

Description

When it was discovered at the Serum Institute of Copenhagen following two outbreaks of a generalised vesicular-pustular rash illness in colonies of a double-stranded DNA virus (genome size about 200 kilobases, seven times larger than has been known to belong to the Orth poxvirus genus of the Poxviridae family In the years that followed the discovery, some pox outbreaks among groups of captive monkeys that originated from some regions of were noted in the United States of America Denmark and the Netherlands In the years that followed the discovery, some pox outbreaks among groups of captive monkeys that originated from some regions of Asia [1].

Although they are closely related, the viola virus (the cause of smallpox) and the monkey pox virus have separate evolutionary histories from their common ancestor and it has been proven that neither can transform into the other he presence of human monkey pox was first ascertained in September -old child in Basankusu district, on Equateur Region, in the Republic Democratic of the Congo. The outcome of the disease was complicated by the onset of other infections leading up to child’s death. Since then, some outbreaks of human monkey pox, a few of which also causing death, have been identified in more than 50 years in several regions of the world. The incidence of monkey pox has risen almost tenfold, over the past few years. Clinically, human monkey pox has similar but milder features than those of smallpox; surely it has a different epidemiology. Initially, two clades of monkey pox virus strains, with about genomic sequence difference, were recognized in some regions of Africa, one of which is more virulent than in accordance with the World Health Organization a novel classification of monkey pox virus strains was proposed based on three clades [2].

Although the still considered the monkey pox a rare viral zoonotic disease of remote areas of central and West Africa, near tropical rainforests on deemed it a public health emergency of international concern, for the moment concentrated among men who have sex with men, especially those with multiple sexual partners, giving few necessary justifications to substantiate its decision the rapid spread of the virus to many countries never seen before and the new modes of transmission, largely unknown, meeting the International Health Regulations criteria. The risk for human health and its potential implication with the international traffic. In the light of this, to avoid misinformation and unjustified public concern this review aims to deepen understanding but also to summarize the latest findings on this infection, particularly with regard to epidemiology, prevention, clinical features, diagnosis, management and strategies adopted to deal with it. Monkey pox may be difficult to distinguish from other exanthemata’s viruses, particularly varicella and viola, making the diagnosis challenging [3].

Utilizing clinical and laboratory results, monkey pox are diagnosed While the laboratory phase focuses on virus detection, the clinical phase is based on the presence of lymphadenomegaly, pre-rash fever, myalgia, headache and back pain. The primary laboratory test entails the use of real-time polymerase chain reaction for nucleic acid amplification testing on the patient's seminal fluid, pharyngeal swabs and exudate from skin lesions Common recommendations state that this procedure should be carried out in two swabs from a minimum of three lesions. As a result, is recognised for its high sensitivity. Sadly, not all locations currently offer this test, despite its y and specificity .Some laboratory discoveries are not very helpful. Even so, hypoalbuminemia, high transaminase levels and low blood urea nitrogen levels are frequently observed.

Although tests for antigens or antibodies may also be used to diagnose monkey pox, their sensitivity and specificity are low due to cross with other orthopoxviruses However; they can be very useful in assessing the anti-orthopoxvirus reaction in cerebrospinal fluid and the subsequent seroconversion to the anti-orthopoxvirus response in cases of orthopoxvirusinduced encephalitis [4,5].

Conclusion

Because of its rapid spread in non-endemic countries, where it may potentially lead to life-threatening situations given that of the world's population is no longer protected against smallpox, human monkey pox, previously categorised as a rare zoonotic disease, has increased awareness within the global public health community. The current monkey pox outbreak has been aided by this sizable population's susceptibility some researchers claim that the isolated clade of monkey pox during the current outbreak could result in the majority of cases being a mild self-limiting disease, while only some of them were hospitalised, primarily for pain However, the majority of views concur that monkey pox poses a serious threat to public health, either because of the potential for bioterrorism or because it can occur naturally.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Bai, Jushan and Pierre Perron. "Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes." Econometrica (1998): 47-78.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Nelson, Jon P. "Consumer bankruptcies and the bankruptcy reform act: A time-series intervention analysis." J Financial Serv Res 17(2000): 181-200.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Clemente, Jesus, Antonio Montañés and Marcelo Reyes. "Testing for a unit root in variables with a double change in the mean." Econ Lett 59 (1998): 175-182.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Dickey, David A. and Wayne A. Fuller. "Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root." J Economy soc (1981): 1057-1072.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Andrews, Donald WK. "Heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimation." J Economy soc (1991): 817-858.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 1931

Journal of Global Economics received 1931 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Global Economics peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward