An Overview of Optical Tools for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Spinal Cord Damage

Resolek Hung^*
*Correspondence: Resolek Hung, Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Denmark Technical University, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark, Email:

Introduction

Spinal cord damage can result in devastating outcomes, including loss of motor function, sensory deficits, and autonomic dysfunction. Early diagnosis and effective treatment are crucial for mitigating these effects and improving the quality of life for patients. Optical tools have become indispensable in both the diagnosis and treatment of spinal cord injuries (SCI), offering non-invasive or minimally invasive methods to visualize, monitor, and treat the damaged spinal cord. This article provides a comprehensive overview of various optical tools used in the diagnosis and treatment of spinal cord damage, highlighting their principles, applications, benefits, and limitations. Optical Coherence Tomography is a non-invasive imaging technique that captures high-resolution cross-sectional images of biological tissues. It utilizes lowcoherence interferometry to measure the backscattered light from different tissue layers, creating detailed images that reveal microstructural changes. OCT is particularly useful for diagnosing spinal cord injuries by providing detailed images of the spinal cord's internal structure [1-3].

Description

The integration of advanced imaging techniques, such as intraoperative CT and MRI, can enhance the precision of spinal cord interventions. Navigation systems and augmented reality may further improve the accuracy of these procedures, reducing the risk of complications. The development of minimally invasive approaches holds promise for reducing surgical trauma and accelerating recovery. Techniques such as endoscopic-assisted laminoplasty and laser ablation are being explored and may offer comparable outcomes with less morbidity. Further research is needed to evaluate the long-term outcomes and quality of life of patients undergoing optical toolbased interventions. Large-scale, multicenter studies with extended follow-up periods will provide valuable insights into the durability of these treatments and their impact on patients' daily lives. Biophotonic sensors use light-based technologies to detect and measure biological parameters. These sensors can be integrated into various devices for continuous monitoring of physiological changes [4,5].

Conclusion

Optical tools have revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of spinal cord damage, offering precise, non-invasive, and effective methods to visualize, monitor, and treat injuries. Techniques such as OCT, confocal microscopy, and multiphoton microscopy provide detailed imaging of the spinal cord, enabling early diagnosis and guiding treatment decisions. Therapeutic applications, including photobiomodulation and laser ablation therapy, offer promising avenues for promoting healing and improving outcomes. Emerging technologies like optogenetics and biophotonic sensors hold great potential for advancing spinal cord injury management, providing real-time control and continuous monitoring of physiological changes. As research and development in optical tools continue to progress, these technologies will play an increasingly vital role in improving the lives of individuals with spinal cord injuries. By harnessing the power of light, optical tools offer a bright future for the diagnosis and treatment of spinal cord damage, paving the way for innovative therapies and enhanced patient care.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Nuwer, Marc R., Ronald G. Emerson, Gloria Galloway and Alan D. Legatt, et al. "Evidence-based guideline update: intraoperative spinal monitoring with somatosensory and transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society." Neurology 78 (2012): 585-589.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Gertsch, Jeffrey H., Joseph J. Moreira, George R. Lee and John D. Hastings, et al. "Practice guidelines for the supervising professional: intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring." J Clin Monit Comput 33 (2019): 175-183.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Reddy, Rajiv P., Robert Chang, Brian P. Rosario and Shreya Sudadi, et al. "What is the predictive value of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring for postoperative neurological deficit in cervical spine surgery?—a meta-analysis." J Spine 21 (2021): 555-570.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Shilian, Parastou, Gabriel Zada, Aaron C. Kim and Andres A. Gonzalez. "Overview of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery." J Clin Neurophysiol 33 (2016): 333-339.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Agaronnik, Nicole D., Anne Kwok, Andrew J. Schoenfeld and Charlotta Lindvall. "Natural language processing for automated surveillance of intraoperative neuromonitoring in spine surgery." J Clin Neurosci 97 (2022): 121-126.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at