Analyzing the Influence of Various Porosity Models on the Properties of FG Sandwich Plates

Arlo Valencia^*
*Correspondence: Arlo Valencia, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada, Email:

Keywords

Functionally graded • Engineering applications • Mechanical behaviour • Spatial variation

Introduction

Functionally graded materials exhibit spatial variation in composition, microstructure and properties, offering tailored solutions for specific engineering challenges. Sandwich structures, composed of two face sheets and a core material, are widely used in aerospace, automotive and marine industries due to their high strength-to-weight ratio. Incorporating porosity into these structures further enhances their versatility, allowing for improved energy absorption, thermal insulation and acoustic damping.

Various mathematical models describe the distribution and behavior of porosity within materials. These models include simple analytical formulations, empirical relations and sophisticated computational simulations. Common porosity models utilized in the analysis of FG sandwich plates include the Gibson-Ashby model, the Koiter model, the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman (GTN) model and finite element methods (FEM) [1,2].

Literature Review

Influence on mechanical properties

Stiffness: Porosity significantly affects the stiffness of FG sandwich plates. As the volume fraction of voids increases, the effective stiffness decreases due to reduced material density and interfacial bonding. The choice of porosity model influences the predicted stiffness values, with complex models capturing the non-linear behavior more accurately than simplified formulations.

Strength: Porosity introduces stress concentration sites, leading to localized deformation and eventual failure. The GTN model, accounting for void growth and coalescence, accurately predicts the strength reduction in FG sandwich plates under tensile and compressive loading. However, simpler models provide quick estimations but may overlook the intricacies of failure mechanisms [3].

Failure modes: The type of porosity model employed affects the predicted failure modes in FG sandwich plates. While analytical models offer insights into overall trends, FEM allows for detailed analysis of stress distribution and crack propagation, facilitating the identification of critical failure mechanisms such as delamination, debonding and core collapse.

Optimization strategies

To enhance the mechanical performance of FG sandwich plates, optimization strategies considering porosity distribution and material composition are employed. Multi-objective optimization techniques aim to maximize stiffness and strength while minimizing weight and manufacturing costs. Incorporating advanced porosity models into optimization algorithms enables the design of lightweight and durable structures tailored to specific application requirements [4,5].

Future directions

Continued research in the field of FG sandwich plates should focus on refining porosity models to capture the complex interactions between material constituents. Integration of experimental validation and advanced characterization techniques, such as micro-CT scanning and digital image correlation, will improve the accuracy of predictive models. Furthermore, exploring novel materials and manufacturing processes can expand the design space for FG sandwich structures, unlocking new opportunities in lightweight engineering [6].

Discussion

The influence of various porosity models on the properties of functionally graded (FG) sandwich plates is a crucial aspect in engineering analysis. Porosity affects the mechanical behavior and performance of these structures, making it essential to choose an appropriate model for accurate predictions.

Several porosity models exist, ranging from simplistic empirical relations to complex computational fluid dynamics-based simulations. These models often differ in their assumptions regarding pore distribution, shape, size and interaction with the surrounding material.

In analyzing FG sandwich plates, researchers commonly consider porosity models such as the Gibson-Ashby model, Kozeny-Carman equation and various finite element-based approaches. Each model offers insights into different aspects of porosity, such as its impact on stiffness, strength and thermal properties.

The choice of porosity model depends on the specific requirements of the analysis and the available experimental data for validation. For instance, if the focus is on macroscopic behavior and overall structural response, simpler models like the Gibson-Ashby model may suffice. Conversely, when detailed insights into pore-scale interactions are necessary, computational fluid dynamics-based models become indispensable.

Ultimately, a comprehensive understanding of how various porosity models influence the properties of FG sandwich plates is essential for designing efficient and reliable structures. By carefully selecting and validating these models, engineers can optimize the performance of FG sandwich plates in diverse applications, ranging from aerospace to civil engineering.

Conclusion

Porosity plays a critical role in determining the mechanical properties of FG sandwich plates. Various porosity models offer insights into the stiffness, strength and failure behavior of these structures. By selecting appropriate models and optimization strategies, engineers can design FG sandwich plates with tailored properties for diverse applications. Continued advancements in modeling techniques and experimental validation will further enhance the performance and reliability of these innovative materials.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Panieri, E. and M. M. Santoro. "ROS homeostasis and metabolism: a dangerous liason in cancer cells." Cell Death Dis 7 (2016): e2253-e2253.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Kamenisch, York, Maria Fousteri, Jennifer Knoch and Anna-Katharina von Thaler, et al. "Proteins of nucleotide and base excision repair pathways interact in mitochondria to protect from loss of subcutaneous fat, a hallmark of aging." Exp Med 207 (2010): 379-390.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Ahmed, Sameh E., Aissa Abderrahmane, Sorour Alotaibi and Obai Younis, et al. "Enhanced heat transfer for NePCM-melting-based thermal energy of finned heat pipe." Nanomaterials 12 (2022): 129.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Liao, Sheng-Kai, Wen-Qi Cai, Wei-Yue Liu and Liang Zhang, et al. "Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution." Nature 549 (2017): 43-47.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Buzano, C., M.G. Rasetti and M.L. Rastello. "Dynamical Superalgebra of the" Dressed" Jaynes-Cummings Model." Phys Rev 62 (1989): 137.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Sabouny, Rasha and Timothy E. Shutt. "Reciprocal regulation of mitochondrial fission and fusion." Trends Biochem 45 (2020): 564-577.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at