Short Communication - (2022) Volume 13, Issue 8
Ancestry Lineage through Short Tendem Repeats (X-STR)
Aqeel Ahmad**
*Correspondence:
Aqeel Ahmad*, Department of Microbiology, University of Karachi, Karachi,
Pakistan,
Email:
Department of Microbiology, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan
Received: 03-Sep-2019, Manuscript No. JFR-19-2034;
Editor assigned: 07-Sep-2019, Pre QC No. JFR-19-2034;
Reviewed: 23-Sep-2019, QC No. JFR-19-2034;
Revised: 01-Sep-2022, Manuscript No. JFR-19-2034;
Published:
31-Oct-2024
, DOI: 10.37421/2157-7145.2024.15.506.
, QI Number: JFR-19-2034
Citation: Ahmad, Aqeel. "Ancestry Lineage through Short Tendem Repeats (X-STR)." J Forensic Res 14 (2024): 506.
Copyright: �?�© 2024 Ahmad A. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution license which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
In the mid 1980s, forensic DNA testing has been introduced It has played a very comprehensive role in providing service to the mankind via
race finding, population determination, cast analysis, parental lineage, declaring punishment to the culprit and providing relief to the innocent.
Remains of the victims of the mass disasters and of the missing people have been recombined for the identification purpose through linking
them with the reference samples. The advancement of the new technologies have enhanced the capabilities of the laboratories working in
recovering DNA results with more accuracy and improved sensitivity. Forensic laboratories have fully adopted automation for the sample
preparation and for data analysis in order to provide efficient results. In forensic DNA analysis Short Tandem Repeat (STR) typing continues to
be the most dependable and durable one although other genetic markers are also available and used for specific purposes.
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, Hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin, Chloroquine
Introduction
Short Tandem Repeats (STR) typing of markers that are located on
the sex chromosomes have been developed into a method which is in
use of many forensic laboratories when providing additional
individualizing information while making the use of widely used
autosomal STRs over the past two and a half decades [1]. The
inheritance patterns of X and Y chromosomes differ both from each
other and from the autosomes, markers that are located on the sex
chromosomes are durable enough to provide different but
complementary information essential in solving forensic caseworks.
In the United States especially the markers present on X
chromosome are less universally observed Forensic use of Y STR
markers is generally accepted and well documented by both the
courts of law and the scientific community. However both X and Y
marker systems continue to be the topic of pious scientific publication
and research. Recent advances providing ever broadening scope in
forensic scenarios by offering opportunities to apply these markers
[2]. Markers such as Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and
Insertion/Deletion Markers (INDELs) have been investigated on X
and Y chromosomes for the autosomes other than STRs but here in
this article the focus is on the forensic development of human specific
(no other species) X and Y STR markers specifically. In forensic DNA
analysis, the specific part of human sex chromosomes are
widely being used specifically in those cases where standard
autosomal DNA profiling is found not much informative [3].A gene fragment of the sex chromosome is applied for the
identification of the biological sex of the trace donor of crime
scene [4]. Characterization of the haplotypes composed of X or
Y chromosomal STRs polymorphism have been done in
paternal lineages of unknown trace donors, more suitable when
males and females have been associated to the same trace such as
in the cases of sexual assault.
Literature Review
DNA testing is always preferred as the most reliable and authentic
one whenever there is a need to get essential and accurate
information. Advancement in DNA testing has made people enable to
know about their genetic ancestry and also get a chance to know that
where some of their ancestors actually came [5]. Suppose if I
considered myself as an African American, I donâ??t know where my
African ancestors actually originate from. I can only point Tennessee
as the only geographic location if I have to mention about my
ancestral home. This new generation of tests for genetic ancestry has
captivated my attention towards itself via providing potential
knowledge and made me able to know about myself more precisely at
genetic level [6].Both X and Y STRs have played essential role in forensic
scenarios although for each marker type the role is different providing
varying benefit in addition to autosomal STRs that are already in use.The inheritance pattern of both chromosomes is unique and is
considered while understanding their application in forensic
casework [7]. Other than this with the autosomes where one
chromosome of each pair from both the parents is passed to both
male and female offspring, in the female offspring X chromosome
comes from both the mother and father while in the male offspring X
chromosome only comes from the mother. The Y chromosome is
present in males only and is entirely passed down from father to its
son and a profile known as haplotype is formed from the combination
of alleles. Hence, the male offspring have one X chromosome from
the mother and one Y chromosome from the father and the female
offspring have one X chromosome from the mother and one X
chromosome from the father [8-11].
During meiosis the two X chromosomes of female recombine in
the same way as in autosomes. Almost the entire chromosome is
passed from parent to child unchanged in case of paternally
inheritance where recombination only occurs within the two small
regions present at the distal ends of the chromosomes known as
Pseudo Autosomal Regions (PAR). Additional considerations are
needed for linked markers during interpretation of X and Y STR
results because currently no STR markers exists within these regions
when utilized for forensic purposes [12-16].
In STR typing many commercially multiplexes are available and
are in use for the identification of the human remains after mass
disasters or in mass graves. In order to get immediate information on
the specimen the sample extract is preserve in large multiplex
[17-19]. If multiple countries or laboratories are participating in the
testing, the decision has to be made as early as possible about which
set of markers has to be used. In international collaborations even it
is essential that all laboratories must test the same loci. The reagents
must be in approach to all the participants and the markers must be
well established in the countries and in the forensic community
involved [20,21].
There are wide range implications of ancestry inference through XSTRs in forensic as reliable genetic source like achievement of
identification of skeletal remains at historical and grave sites,
perceived ethnicity of deceased individual when information is
limited or conflicting, donors ancestry confirmation, refining STR
based familial research strategies and for enhancing the sensitivity of
forensic studies [22].
are helpful to find the extinct of common ancestry, paternal lineage,
race determination and much more. Analysis of autosomal STRs
will provide statistical strength to X and Y STRs results, but
hereditary inconsistencies complicate the interpretation of autosomal
STRs. Similarly, in recent forensic study of paternity case found that
alleged father is close relative of girlâ??s true father, universally
X and Y STRs are more informative for forensic analysis then
autosomal STRs. Alleged criminal, paternity and race
determination cases provides detail about more informative side of X
and Y STRs. X and Y STRs are inherited in predictable way
thatâ??s why they outcome the informative side of autosomal STRs
[25-29]. Besides routine paternity and lineage investigation, STRs
analysis is much more helpful in mass disasters where we donâ??t have
any other tool for forensic analysis of victims of different races and
origin. STR analysis is cost efficient way to explore more
discrimination among mass disasters victim as well as finding of
reference family and race [30,31].
So how all of this is done? Multiplex X and Y STRs kits are
available commercially that utilized small amplicons for
forensic study. Hundreds of X and Y STRs on chromosomes are
discovered so far, Y STRs comparison study is based on 9
core markers including DYS19, DYS 385 a/b, DYS390-93, DYS389i,
DYS389ii, this heptad is collectively called â??minimal haplotypeâ?.
These are generally used for forensic and genetic analysis
including population studies, lineage, paternity and disasters.
Commercially available and most commonly used Y STRs analysis
kits include â??PowerPlex Yâ? â??ampF/STRâ? â??Yfiler Plusâ? Varied
multiplex analysis are available non-commercially with
similar and supplementary loci as target for study [32-35].
As compared to Y STRs, X STRs are more diverse, nonstandardized globally and are differentially used by different
communities [35]. For compiling more relevant information using
X STRs, we have to move towards more standardized approach
for whole communities, races and continents. Many companies
are manufacturing commercially available X STRs kits which
include â??Qiagen X-12â? â??Mentype Argus X-UL â??Argus X-8 (8-
multiplex)â?. The current variant is X-12 which includes 12
multiplex for X STRs analysis as more and more laboratories are
demanding X-STRs as we are moving forward. Increase in
literature on X and Y STRs provide the potential for
comparison analysis using the data published by different
laboratories. Extensive literature was search and selective X-STRs
are studied to find the lineage and comparative analysis of major
communities and races of the different regions of the globe [34].
Randomly 20 X-STRs markers namely, HumARA, DXS6803,
GATA165B12, DXS981, DXS6800, GATA31E08, DXS9898,
DXS6807, DXS6809, GATA172D05, DXS7133, DXS8378, DXS7424,
DXS7132, DXS8377, DXS6789, DXS7423, HPRTB, DXS101are
analyzed and compared from forensic studies conducted in Pakistan
and related countries. Following data is generated, that shows
similarity and differences among different races in X-STR
markers identification studies among masses of different countries.
Conclusion
Forensic analysis at molecular level offers the promise
to uncover the underlying important information.
Enormous progress was made in last 20 years due to
advancement in DNA typing technologies like SNPs,
STRs, INDELs, etc. Nowadays Short Tendem Repeat (STR)
are prominently used for different aspects of forensic analysis.
Though, autosomal STRs have their importance as workhorse in
forensic analysis, X-STRs are becoming efficient forensic analysis
tools aspect due to more accuracy and enhanced sensitivity. Many
different X Chromosomes STR markers are discovered so far and
are playing essential role in providing information about origin of
individual or remain where other sources of information are absent.
Many articles are thoroughly reviewed to extract information on XSTRs, 20 X-STR markers are selected, studied and analyzed in
different populations to find their role in realizing the origin. The
generated data shows that different populations have some
similarity in X-STR markers, showing less and more common
descendants among groups studied and geographical linkage
between these distinct but related populations.
X-STRs are proving their prominence to the forensic world due to
their role in achievement of identification of skeletal remains at
historical and grave sites, perceived ethnicity of deceased
individual when information is limited or conflicting, donors
ancestry confirmation, refining STR based familial research
strategies and for enhancing the sensitivity of forensic studies.
Further epithet of X-STR is required to enlighten the future of
forensic analysis.