GET THE APP

Application of AI-driven Quality Control in High-volume Manufacturing Systems
..

Industrial Engineering & Management

ISSN: 2169-0316

Open Access

Short Communication - (2024) Volume 13, Issue 5

Application of AI-driven Quality Control in High-volume Manufacturing Systems

Lucas Camila*
*Correspondence: Lucas Camila, Department of Information Technology, Arabian Gulf University, Manama 329, Bahrain, Bahrain, Email:
Department of Information Technology, Arabian Gulf University, Manama 329, Bahrain, Bahrain

Received: 26-Aug-2024, Manuscript No. iem-24-155003; Editor assigned: 28-Aug-2024, Pre QC No. P-155003; Reviewed: 09-Sep-2024, QC No. Q-155003; Revised: 16-Sep-2024, Manuscript No. R-155003; Published: 23-Sep-2024 , DOI: 10.37421/2169-0316.2024.13.269
Citation: Camila, Lucas. “Application of AI-driven Quality Control in High-volume Manufacturing Systems.” Ind Eng Manag 13 (2024): 269.
Copyright: © 2024 Camila L. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

High-volume manufacturing is the backbone of industries like automotive, electronics, consumer goods and pharmaceuticals, where large quantities of products are produced with precision and efficiency. The challenges in such systems often revolve around maintaining consistent quality while meeting strict production deadlines. Traditional Quality Control (QC) methods, such as manual inspection and statistical process control, have their limitations when applied to modern high-volume manufacturing. With the rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), the landscape of quality control is evolving. AI-driven solutions offer real-time, automated inspection and predictive maintenance, helping manufacturers maintain high-quality standards at scale. This article delves into the application of AI in quality control within high-volume manufacturing systems, exploring its benefits, challenges and the future of AI integration in industrial environments [1].

Description

Traditional quality control in high-volume manufacturing

Quality control in traditional manufacturing settings relies heavily on human intervention and manual inspections. Common methods include visual inspection, sampling methods and statistical analysis. While these techniques have been foundational in ensuring product quality, they often fall short in high-volume environments for several reasons [2]:

  1. Human error: Manual inspections are subject to fatigue and inconsistencies, leading to potential oversight.
  2. Speed limitations: In high-volume settings, manual inspection can slow down production, causing delays and bottlenecks.
  3. Limited predictive insights: Traditional QC methods are reactive rather than predictive, making it difficult to anticipate defects before they occur [3].

To address these limitations, AI technologies have been increasingly integrated into manufacturing processes to provide more efficient and accurate quality control.

Ai-driven quality control: An overview

AI-driven quality control involves using Machine Learning (ML) models, computer vision and other AI technologies to automate the inspection and monitoring of products in real-time. AI-powered systems can analyze data from various sensors, cameras and other input devices to detect defects, predict maintenance needs and optimize production parameters. These systems can be integrated into existing manufacturing lines with minimal disruption [4].

The key AI technologies driving quality control in high-volume manufacturing systems include:

  1. Machine vision and deep learning: AI systems equipped with machine vision can capture high-resolution images of products at various stages of production. Deep learning algorithms analyze these images to identify defects or deviations from the desired specifications. This is particularly useful for detecting surface defects, alignment issues, or dimensional discrepancies that would be difficult for human inspectors to spot in real time.
  2. Predictive analytics: Predictive analytics uses historical data and machine learning algorithms to forecast potential quality issues before they occur. By analyzing patterns in production data, AI models can predict failures, substandard products, or system malfunctions, allowing manufacturers to take proactive corrective actions and prevent defects.
  3. Edge computing and iot integration: AI systems can be integrated with the Internet of Things (IoT) to gather real-time data from sensors embedded in machines, products and production lines. Edge computing allows AI algorithms to process this data locally, providing real-time feedback and enabling faster decision-making without relying on cloud-based servers.
  4. Robotic Process Automation (RPA): In some cases, AI-driven robots can be used to perform quality control tasks, such as sorting defective products, repairing minor flaws, or replacing faulty parts [5].

Conclusion

The application of AI in quality control represents a major leap forward for high-volume manufacturing systems. By automating and enhancing defect detection, predictive maintenance and process optimization, AI helps manufacturers maintain high-quality standards while reducing costs and improving efficiency. Despite challenges like data quality, integration with legacy systems and workforce training, the long-term benefits of AI-driven quality control are clear. As AI technologies continue to advance, their impact on manufacturing will only grow, ushering in a new era of smarter, more efficient production processes.

Acknowledgment

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Kara, Ahmet and Ibrahim Dogan. "Reinforcement learning approaches for specifying ordering policies of perishable inventory systems." Expert Syst Appl 91 (2018): 150-158.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  2. Wanke, Peter, Henrique Ewbank, Víctor Leiva and Fernando Rojas. "Inventory management for new products with triangularly distributed demand and lead-time." Comput Oper Res 69 (2016): 97-108.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Bacchetti, Andrea and Nicola Saccani. "Spare parts classification and demand forecasting for stock control: Investigating the gap between research and practice." Omega 40 (2012): 722-737.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  4. Chu, Won-Shik, Chung-Soo Kim, Hyun-Taek Lee and Jung-Oh Choi, et al. "Hybrid manufacturing in micro/nano scale: A review." Int J Precis Eng Manuf - Green Technol 1 (2014): 75-92.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Karunakaran, K. P., S. Suryakumar, Vishal Pushpa and Sreenathbabu Akula. "Low cost integration of additive and subtractive processes for hybrid layered manufacturing." Robot Comput Integr Manuf 26 (2010): 490-499.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 739

Industrial Engineering & Management received 739 citations as per Google Scholar report

Industrial Engineering & Management peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward