Are Cosmetic Preservatives Hazardous Micropollutants Requiring More Focus?

Kai Rausal^*
*Correspondence: Kai Rausal, Department of Technology, University of Tartu, Nooruse 1, 50411 Tartu, Estonia, Email:

Keywords

Cosmetic preservatives • Environmental impact • Man health • Regulation

Introduction

Cosmetic products are ubiquitous in modern society, with preservatives playing a critical role in maintaining their safety and extending their shelf life. Preservatives prevent microbial growth, thereby reducing the risk of contamination and spoilage. However, the widespread use of these chemicals raises concerns about their environmental and health impacts, as they may act as hazardous micropollutants. Micropollutants are chemical substances present in trace amounts that can cause environmental and health issues. In the context of cosmetics, preservatives can enter water systems through various disposal methods and accumulate in the environment [1]. The potential adverse effects of these preservatives on ecosystems and human health are becoming increasingly apparent, prompting calls for more comprehensive research and stricter regulations. This article aims to explore the potential risks associated with cosmetic preservatives and to assess whether they warrant greater attention from regulators and researchers. It will review existing literature, discuss the environmental and health impacts of these substances and propose recommendations for future research and policy improvements.

Literature Review

The role of preservatives in cosmetics

Preservatives are added to cosmetic products to inhibit the growth of bacteria, fungi and other microorganisms. This function is essential for preventing spoilage and ensuring the safety of the product throughout its intended use period. Without preservatives, cosmetics could quickly become contaminated, leading to potential health risks for users. The most common preservatives include parabens, phthalates and phenoxyethanol, each of which has unique properties and uses.

Parabens

Parabens are a class of synthetic compounds widely used in cosmetics due to their antimicrobial properties. They effectively prevent the growth of bacteria and fungi, thereby prolonging the shelf life of products. Despite their efficacy, parabens have raised concerns due to their potential endocrine-disrupting effects. They can mimic estrogen, a hormone involved in various bodily functions, which has led to fears about their role in hormone-related health issues, including breast cancer. Additionally, parabens can accumulate in aquatic environments through wastewater discharge, where they may impact aquatic organisms [2].

Phthalates

Phthalates are another group of chemicals commonly used in cosmetics to enhance product flexibility and longevity. They are often found in fragrances, nail polishes and hair products. Phthalates are known to interfere with endocrine function, which can disrupt hormonal balance and potentially lead to reproductive and developmental issues. Their persistence in the environment is a significant concern, as they can accumulate in soil and water, affecting wildlife and potentially entering the food chain.

Phenoxyethanol

Phenoxyethanol is a preservative used in various cosmetics for its antimicrobial properties. It helps to prevent bacterial and fungal growth, thus ensuring product safety. While it is considered effective at certain concentrations, there are concerns about its potential toxicity. Phenoxyethanol has been associated with skin irritation and, in higher concentrations, neurotoxic effects. Its presence in wastewater can also contribute to environmental pollution, raising concerns about its long-term impact on aquatic ecosystems.

Discussion

Environmental impact of cosmetic preservatives

The environmental impact of cosmetic preservatives is a growing area of concern. These substances, even in trace amounts, can have significant effects on ecosystems. Parabens, phthalates and phenoxyethanol can enter water systems through various routes, including runoff from personal care products and wastewater from manufacturing processes. Once in the environment, these chemicals can persist for extended periods, leading to potential bioaccumulation in aquatic organisms. For instance, parabens have been detected in fish and other aquatic species, where they can disrupt reproductive processes and contribute to population declines. Phthalates, with their ability to affect endocrine systems, pose risks to a wide range of wildlife, potentially leading to developmental and reproductive problems [3]. The long-term accumulation of these substances in soil and water can also affect plant life, further disrupting ecosystems.

Human health risks

The potential health risks associated with cosmetic preservatives are multifaceted. While regulatory agencies set concentration limits based on current safety data, the cumulative and long-term effects of low-level exposures are not fully understood. Parabens, with their estrogen-mimicking properties, raise concerns about hormone-related health issues, including reproductive health and cancer. Phthalates, known for their endocrine-disrupting effects, have been linked to developmental and reproductive disorders [4]. Phenoxyethanol, while considered safe within established limits, has raised concerns due to its potential for skin irritation and neurotoxicity at higher concentrations. The health risks of prolonged exposure to these substances, even at low levels, are not fully comprehended. This uncertainty underscores the need for more comprehensive research to evaluate the long-term health impacts of these preservatives.

Regulatory considerations

Current regulatory frameworks for cosmetic preservatives vary globally, with some regions implementing stricter controls than others. For example, the European Union has more stringent regulations regarding the use of certain preservatives compared to other regions. This discrepancy highlights the need for international collaboration and harmonization of standards to address the challenges posed by hazardous micropollutants. Existing regulations often focus on individual chemicals rather than their cumulative or synergistic effects. As cosmetic formulations become more complex, with multiple preservatives and other additives, it is essential to consider the combined effects of these substances. Additionally, regulations should be updated regularly to reflect new scientific findings and emerging evidence about the risks associated with cosmetic preservatives [5,6].

Conclusion

Cosmetic preservatives play a vital role in ensuring the safety and efficacy of personal care products. However, their potential as hazardous micropollutants raises important concerns about their environmental and health impacts. Current research suggests that while some preservatives are deemed safe at specific concentrations, their cumulative and long-term effects warrant further investigation.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Gilbert, Peter and L. E. Moore. "Cationic antiseptics: Diversity of action under a common epithet."J Appl Microbiol 99 (2005): 703-715.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Buffet-Bataillon, Sylvie, Pierre Tattevin, Martine Bonnaure-Mallet and Anne Jolivet-Gougeon. "Emergence of resistance to antibacterial agents: the role of quaternary ammonium compounds—a critical review."IntJAntimicrobAgents 39 (2012): 381-389.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Zhong, Wenjue, Donghong Wang and Xiaowei Xu. "Phenol removal efficiencies of sewage treatment processes and ecological risks associated with phenols in effluents."J HazardMater 217 (2012): 286-292.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Rostkowski, Pawel, Julia Horwood, Janice A. Shears and Anke Lange, et al. "Bioassay-directed identification of novel antiandrogenic compounds in bile of fish exposed to wastewater effluents."Environ Sci Technol 45 (2011): 10660-10667.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Butkovskyi, A., L. Hernandez Leal, G. Zeeman and H. H. M. Rijnaarts. "Micropollutants in source separated wastewater streams and recovered resources of source separated sanitation."Environ Res 156 (2017): 434-442.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Paijens, Claudia, Adèle Bressy, Bertrand Frère and Damien Tedoldi, et al. "Urban pathways of biocides towards surface waters during dry and wet weathers: Assessment at the Paris conurbation scale."J Hazard Mater402 (2021): 123765.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at