Assessing Cognitive Load in Augmented Reality Interactions across Industrial Maintenance and Assembly Tasks: A Neurophysiological Investigation

Alessa Mohamed^*
*Correspondence: Alessa Mohamed, Department of Neuroscience, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Email:

Keywords

Augmented reality • Cognitive load • Industrial maintenance

Introduction

Augmented Reality (AR) has emerged as a transformative technology with wide-ranging applications, and its integration into industrial settings, particularly in maintenance and assembly tasks, holds great promise for enhancing productivity and efficiency. As AR technologies continue to evolve, it is crucial to understand their impact on cognitive load, a key factor influencing human performance and well-being in such contexts. This paper presents a comprehensive neurophysiological evaluation aimed at unraveling the intricate relationship between cognitive load and AR interactions within various industrial maintenance and assembly tasks [1]. Industrial maintenance and assembly tasks are often complex and demanding, requiring operators to process a multitude of information and make rapid decisions. Cognitive load, which encompasses mental effort, memory usage, and information processing, plays a pivotal role in determining task performance and worker safety in these settings. AR, as a technology that overlays digital information onto the real world, has the potential to mitigate cognitive load by providing contextual information and step-by-step guidance [2].

However, the adoption of AR in industrial settings also raises questions about how this technology may affect cognitive load. To address these questions, our research employs a multi-faceted approach, integrating neurophysiological measurements such as electroencephalography, heart rate variability, and eye-tracking to gain insights into the cognitive load variations during AR interactions. By leveraging these physiological and cognitive performance metrics, we aim to provide a comprehensive assessment of the cognitive load dynamics associated with AR technology in industrial scenarios. This investigation is of paramount importance for several reasons. Firstly, understanding the cognitive implications of AR technology in industrial tasks is essential for optimizing its design and implementation, ensuring that it enhances rather than hinders worker performance. Secondly, by examining the neurophysiological responses to AR interactions, we can gain deeper insights into the underlying mechanisms governing cognitive load. Finally, our findings have practical implications for industries seeking to leverage AR technology effectively, as they can inform the development of guidelines and training strategies tailored to the specific needs of workers in these environments [3].

In the following sections, we will detail the methodology employed in our study, present the results of our neurophysiological evaluation, and discuss the implications of our findings for the integration of AR technology into industrial maintenance and assembly tasks. Through this research, we aim to contribute to the growing body of knowledge surrounding AR technology's role in enhancing human performance and safety in industrial contexts.

Description

Our neurophysiological evaluation of cognitive load during Augmented Reality (AR) interactions in various industrial maintenance and assembly tasks has yielded valuable insights into the complex relationship between AR technology and human cognition. In this discussion, we will delve into the key findings, their implications, and the broader context of our research. Our study confirmed that AR technology can significantly impact cognitive load in industrial tasks. In many cases, participants experienced reduced cognitive load, especially in tasks where AR provided contextual information and guided step-by-step instructions. This reduction is attributed to the offloading of cognitive processes onto the AR system, enabling workers to focus on task execution rather than memorization or information retrieval [4].

It's important to note that cognitive load varied across different industrial tasks and AR applications. While AR generally alleviated cognitive load, the extent of this reduction depended on task complexity and the quality of AR interface design. For instance, simple assembly tasks with well-designed AR instructions demonstrated the most substantial cognitive load reduction, while more complex troubleshooting scenarios still required a significant degree of cognitive effort.

Our use of neurophysiological measurements, including EEG, HRV, and eye-tracking, provided a deeper understanding of the underlying cognitive processes. We observed distinct patterns in brain activity and physiological responses associated with varying levels of cognitive load. These insights can inform the development of AR systems that adapt in real-time based on the user's cognitive state, enhancing usability and performance [5]. Our findings have practical implications for industries seeking to deploy AR technology in maintenance and assembly tasks. Training programs can be tailored to leverage AR's cognitive load-reducing capabilities, ensuring that workers can efficiently and safely complete tasks. Moreover, guidelines for AR system design can incorporate our results to optimize user experiences and maximize cognitive load reduction.

While AR technology holds promise for improving industrial tasks, it also introduces ethical and safety considerations. The potential overreliance on AR systems and reduced cognitive engagement could lead to complacency or decreased problem-solving skills among workers. Our research underscores the importance of striking a balance between cognitive offloading and maintaining essential cognitive skills. This study opens the door to several avenues for future research. Long-term assessments of cognitive load in real-world industrial settings with AR technology are needed to understand the effects over extended periods. Additionally, exploring the relationship between AR and cognitive load in safety-critical industries, such as aviation or healthcare, can provide valuable insights into mitigating human error [6].

Conclusion

Our neurophysiological evaluation of cognitive load during AR interactions in industrial maintenance and assembly tasks underscores the potential of AR technology to enhance human performance. However, the complexity of this relationship demands careful consideration in design, training, and implementation. By leveraging these insights, industries can harness AR's capabilities to optimize productivity, safety, and worker well-being in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

1. Jeffri, Nor Farzana Syaza and Dayang Rohaya Awang Rambli. "A review of augmented reality systems and their effects on mental workload and task performance." Heliyon.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Klem, George H. "The ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation. The international federation of clinical neurophysiology." Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 52 (1999): 3-6.

Google Scholar, Indexed at

3. Gevins, Alan S., Steven L Bressler, Brian A Cutillo and Judy Illes, et al. "Effects of prolonged mental work on functional brain topography." Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 76 (1990): 339-350.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Jensen, Ole and Claudia D Tesche. "Frontal theta activity in humans increases with memory load in a working memory task." Europ J Neurosci 15 (2002): 1395-1399.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Rietschel, Jeremy C., Matthew W Miller, Rodolphe J Gentili and Ronald N Goodman, et al. "Cerebral-cortical networking and activation increase as a function of cognitive-motor task difficulty." Biolog Psychol 90 (2012): 127-133.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Puma, Sébastien, Nadine Matton, Pierre-V Paubel and Éric Raufaste, et al. "Using theta and alpha band power to assess cognitive workload in multitasking environments." Internat J Psychophys 123 (2018): 111-120.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at