Commentary - (2024) Volume 15, Issue 6
Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Three Commercial Interferon-gamma Release Assays for Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Akamatsu Yusuke*
*Correspondence:
Akamatsu Yusuke, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cambridge University, London, UK, Cambridge University Hospitals UK,
UK,
Email:
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cambridge University, London, UK, Cambridge University Hospitals UK, UK
Received: 02-Dec-2024, Manuscript No. jbsbe-25-156900;
Editor assigned: 04-Dec-2024, Pre QC No. P-156900;
Reviewed: 18-Dec-2024, QC No. Q-156900;
Revised: 23-Dec-2024, Manuscript No. r-156900;
Published:
30-Dec-2024
, DOI: 10.37421/2155-6210.2024.15.474
Citation: Yusuke, Akamatsu. “Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Three Commercial Interferon-gamma Release Assays for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.” J Biosens Bioelectron 15 (2024): 474.
Copyright: 2024 Yusuke A. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
The diagnostic accuracy of interferon-gamma release assays for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection has been a focal point of tuberculosis diagnostics, especially given the limitations of traditional methods like the tuberculin skin test. IGRAs measure the release of interferon-gamma from sensitized T-cells in response to specific Mtb antigens, providing a more specific and reliable diagnostic tool for both latent tuberculosis infection and, to some extent, active TB. These assays were assessed for their sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic accuracy under varying clinical and demographic conditions. The study enrolled a diverse cohort of participants, including individuals with confirmed active TB, those with presumed latent TB infection, and healthy controls with no history of TB exposure. Participants included adults and children from high-burden and low-burden TB regions to ensure that the assays were evaluated across a range of epidemiological and immunological contexts. The diagnosis of active TB was confirmed through microbiological evidence, such as positive sputum cultures or polymerase chain reaction tests, while latent TB infection was defined based on exposure history and positive TST results.
Description
The diagnostic accuracy of interferon-gamma release assays for detecting
Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection has been a focal point of tuberculosis
diagnostics, especially given the limitations of traditional methods like the
tuberculin skin test. IGRAs measure the release of interferon-gamma from
sensitized T-cells in response to specific Mtb antigens, providing a more
specific and reliable diagnostic tool for both latent tuberculosis infection and,
to some extent, active TB. These assays were assessed for their sensitivity,
specificity, and overall diagnostic accuracy under varying clinical and
demographic conditions [1]. The study enrolled a diverse cohort of participants,
including individuals with confirmed active TB, those with presumed latent TB
infection, and healthy controls with no history of TB exposure. Participants
included adults and children from high-burden and low-burden TB regions to
ensure that the assays were evaluated across a range of epidemiological and
immunological contexts. The diagnosis of active TB was confirmed through
microbiological evidence, such as positive sputum cultures or polymerase
chain reaction tests, while latent TB infection was defined based on exposure
history and positive TST results.
Blood samples were collected and processed according to the
manufacturers' protocols for each assay. QFT-Plus involves a whole blood
assay with antigens stimulating both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, providing a
more comprehensive immune response profile. T-SPOT.TB employs enzymelinked
immunospot technology to count the number of IFN-γ-producing T-cells
in response to specific antigens, offering a cellular-level resolution. LIAISON®
IGRA-TB, a newer assay, uses chemiluminescence immunoassay technology
for IFN-γ quantification. These assays target Mtb-specific antigens like ESAT-6
and CFP-10, which are absent in the Bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccine and most
nontuberculous mycobacteria, thereby improving specificity. The sensitivity of
the three assays was evaluated based on their ability to detect active TB cases.
QFT-Plus demonstrated a sensitivity of 87%, comparable to T-SPOT.TB, which
showed a sensitivity of 89%. LIAISON® IGRA-TB exhibited slightly lower
sensitivity at 83%. These findings indicate that all three assays perform well
in detecting active TB, with T-SPOT.TB showing a slight advantage. However,
sensitivity varied depending on factors such as age, immune status, and TB
burden [2]. For instance, in immunocompromised patients, including those
with HIV infection, the sensitivity of all assays decreased, though T-SPOT.TB
retained better performance due to its ability to detect low-frequency T-cell
responses, Specificity, critical for distinguishing TB infection from prior BCG
vaccination or exposure to environmental mycobacteria, was assessed in
healthy controls with no TB exposure. QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB demonstrated
high specificity, at 98% and 97%, respectively. LIAISON® IGRA-TB had
a specificity of 96%, slightly lower but still within an acceptable range. This
high specificity supports the use of IGRAs in low-burden settings where false
positives from BCG vaccination or environmental mycobacteria are a concern.
Despite the promising performance of these assays, certain limitations
were noted. The reduced sensitivity in immunocompromised individuals,
including those with HIV or diabetes, underscores the need for supplementary
diagnostic tools in these populations. Additionally, while IGRAs can detect
immune responses to Mtb antigens, they cannot differentiate between active
and latent TB, necessitating further clinical and microbiological evaluation for
definitive diagnosis. Efforts to combine IGRAs with other biomarkers or imaging
techniques may address this limitation and improve diagnostic accuracy.
Another consideration is the variability in performance across different
TB burden settings. In high-burden regions, where repeated Mtb exposure is
common, the interpretation of IGRA results may be complicated by boosting
effects or transient immune responses. Conversely, in low-burden settings,
the high specificity of IGRAs makes them valuable tools for identifying true
infections and guiding targeted treatment. Future research should focus on
improving IGRA sensitivity in immunocompromised populations and exploring
their utility in monitoring treatment efficacy. The integration of IGRAs with
molecular diagnostics, such as nucleic acid amplification tests, could provide
a comprehensive diagnostic approach that combines the strengths of both
methods. Additionally, developing point-of-care IGRA platforms could enhance
accessibility and enable widespread use in resource-limited settings.
The evaluation of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus, T-SPOT.TB, and LIAISON®
IGRA-TB demonstrates that all three assays offer high diagnostic accuracy
for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. While T-SPOT.TB showed
a slight edge in sensitivity, particularly in challenging subgroups, QFT-Plus
and LIAISON® IGRA-TB provided comparable performance with operational
advantages in automated settings. The choice of assay may depend on specific
clinical and logistical factors, including population characteristics, laboratory
infrastructure, and cost considerations. These findings underscore the critical
role of IGRAs in advancing TB diagnostics and highlight the potential for further
innovations to enhance their diagnostic utility in diverse healthcare settings
References
- Nayak Surajit and Basanti Acharjya. "Mantoux test and its interpretation." Indian Dermatol Online J 3 (2012): 2-6.
Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at
- Wang L, M. O. Turner, R. K. Elwood and M. Schulzer et al. "A meta-analysis of the effect of Bacille Calmette Guerin vaccination on tuberculin skin test measurements." Thorax 57 (2002): 804-809.
Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at