Automated Fluorescence Immunochromatographic Assay Range Adjustment Using Image Processing

Haneul Gao^*
*Correspondence: Haneul Gao, Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul 02447, Korea, Email:

Introduction

In the realm of medical diagnostics, rapid and accurate detection of biomarkers plays a pivotal role in disease diagnosis, monitoring and management. Fluorescence Immunochromatographic Assay (FIA) has emerged as a powerful tool for point-of-care testing, offering simplicity, speed and sensitivity in detecting various analytes, including infectious agents, hormones and tumor markers. However, the interpretation of FIA results can be influenced by factors such as ambient light, sample volume and operator variability, leading to inaccuracies and false positives or negatives. To address these challenges, automated image processing techniques have been developed to enhance the accuracy and reliability of FIA by adjusting the assay's dynamic range in real-time [1]. This comprehensive review explores the intersection of FIA and image processing, focusing on recent advancements in automated range adjustment techniques. It provides an overview of the principles underlying FIA and the challenges associated with manual interpretation of assay results. Furthermore, it examines the role of image processing algorithms in optimizing FIA performance by calibrating signal intensity, reducing background noise and improving the accuracy of analyte quantification. Through case studies and experimental evidence, this review highlights the potential of automated range adjustment in revolutionizing point-of-care diagnostics and expanding the clinical utility of FIA platforms [2].

Description

Fluorescence Immunochromatographic Assay (FIA) is a lateral flow immunoassay technique that combines the principles of immunochromatography and fluorescence detection to enable rapid and sensitive detection of target analytes in biological samples. In a typical FIA, a sample containing the analyte of interest is applied to a test strip containing immobilized capture antibodies. As the sample migrates along the strip, the analyte binds to fluorescently-labeled detection antibodies, forming a sandwich complex that can be visualized under a fluorescence reader. The intensity of the fluorescence signal is proportional to the concentration of the analyte in the sample, allowing for quantitative analysis of biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity [3]. While FIA offers numerous advantages for point-of-care testing, including rapid turnaround time and minimal sample volume requirements, the interpretation of assay results can be influenced by various factors that affect signal intensity and background noise. Ambient light, fluctuations in sample volume and variations in operator technique can all contribute to variability in assay performance, leading to inaccuracies and inconsistencies in diagnostic outcomes. Manual adjustment of FIA dynamic range by changing exposure settings or threshold values can mitigate some of these issues but is time-consuming and prone to human error. To address these challenges, automated image processing techniques have been developed to optimize FIA performance by dynamically adjusting the assay’s dynamic ranges in real-time.

By analyzing digital images of FIA test strips captured by fluorescence readers or smartphone cameras, image processing algorithms can identify regions of interest corresponding to test and control lines, extract fluorescence intensity values and calibrate the signal to background ratio. This automated range adjustment process enables accurate quantification of analytes across a wide range of concentrations, minimizing the impact of external factors on assay performance and improving diagnostic accuracy [4]. Several image processing algorithms have been proposed for automated range adjustment in FIA, including thresholding, background subtraction and morphological operations. These algorithms leverage mathematical principles and computer vision techniques to enhance the contrast between positive and negative signal regions, suppress background noise and optimize signal-to-noise ratio. Additionally, machine learning approaches, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), have shown promise in automating the interpretation of FIA results by training models to recognize patterns and features associated with different analyte concentrations. Case studies and experimental validations have demonstrated the efficacy of automated range adjustment techniques in improving the accuracy and reliability of FIA across various clinical applications, including infectious disease diagnosis, hormone detection and cancer screening. By reducing reliance on manual intervention and subjective judgment, automated image processing offers a standardized and reproducible approach to FIA result interpretation, facilitating seamless integration into point-of-care testing workflows and enabling broader adoption of FIA platforms in clinical settings [5].

Conclusion

In conclusion, automated image processing techniques represent a paradigm shift in the field of Fluorescence Immunochromatographic Assay (FIA), offering a scalable and standardized approach to dynamic range adjustment and result interpretation. By leveraging digital imaging technology and computational algorithms, automated range adjustment algorithms enhance the accuracy, reliability and reproducibility of FIA across diverse clinical applications. Through real-time analysis of FIA test strip images, these algorithms optimize signal intensity, suppress background noise and improve the accuracy of analyte quantification, thereby overcoming the limitations of manual interpretation and human variability. The integration of automated image processing into FIA workflows has the potential to revolutionize pointof- care diagnostics by streamlining assay performance, reducing turnaround time and improving diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, automated range adjustment techniques enable broader adoption of FIA platforms in resourcelimited settings, where access to trained personnel and sophisticated laboratory equipment may be limited. By democratizing access to high-quality diagnostic testing, automated FIA has the potential to improve healthcare outcomes, facilitate early disease detection and inform timely interventions, ultimately benefiting patients and healthcare providers worldwide. Looking ahead, continued research and development in automated image processing algorithms, coupled with advancements in fluorescence detection technology and point-of-care testing platforms, will further enhance the clinical utility and scalability of FIA for a wide range of diagnostic applications. By harnessing the power of automation and artificial intelligence, we can unlock the full potential of FIA as a transformative tool for personalized medicine, disease surveillance and population health management, ushering in a new era of precision diagnostics and patient-centered care.

Acknowledgement

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest by author.

References

1. Guo, Hongli, Xiaohong Zhou, Yan Zhang and Baodong Song, et al. "Highly sensitive and simultaneous detection of melamine and aflatoxin M1 in milk products by Multiplexed Planar Waveguide Fluorescence Immunosensor (MPWFI)." Food Chem 197 (2016): 359-366.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Tanaka, Ryo, Teruko Yuhi, Naoki Nagatani and Tatsuro Endo, et al. "A novel enhancement assay for immunochromatographic test strips using gold nanoparticles." Anal Bioanal Chem 385 (2006): 1414-1420.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Choi, Sunga, Eui Yul Choi, Dong Joon Kim and Jae Hoon Kim, et al. "A rapid, simple measurement of human albumin in whole blood using a fluorescence immunoassay (I)." Clin Chim Acta 339 (2004): 147-156.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Bai, Zhihong, Yunbo Luo, Wentao Xu and Huafang Gao, et al. "Development of a new fluorescence immunochromatography strip for detection of chloramphenicol residues in chicken muscles." J Sci Food Agric 93 (2013): 3743-3747.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Tang, Yiwei, Hong Zhang, Xiuying Liu and Evan Trofimchuk, et al. "Advantage of Eu3+‐doped polystyrene microspheres compared with colloidal gold used in immunochromatographic assays for the detection of melamine in milk." J Food Sci 82 (2017): 694-697.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at