Bone Thickness Mapping as a Guide for Bone-anchored Port Implantation Surgery in the Temporal Bone

Mia Brown^*
*Correspondence: Mia Brown, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The Medical University of Warsaw, 5 Chalubinskiego St., 02004 Warsaw, Poland, Poland, Email:

Introduction

Bone-anchored port implantation, particularly in the context of temporal bone surgery, plays a crucial role in a variety of clinical procedures, ranging from cochlear implantation to prosthetic hearing devices and, more recently, drug delivery systems. The temporal bone, due to its dense and intricate structure, poses significant challenges in surgical precision and implant stability. One of the most critical aspects of successful implantation is ensuring that the surgical procedure accounts for the unique anatomical and biomechanical properties of the bone in this area. The temporal bone is a highly complex region of the skull, housing critical structures such as the cochlea, vestibular system and the auditory canal, all of which must be navigated with precision [1].

The successful anchoring of an implant in the temporal bone is heavily dependent on the thickness and integrity of the bone at the implantation site. If the bone is too thin or porous, there may be a risk of implant instability, leading to complications such as implant failure, infections, or displacement. On the other hand, overly thick bone can make the insertion of the implant difficult, possibly leading to damage of surrounding sensitive structures. To address these challenges, a precise understanding of the bone thickness throughout the temporal bone is required. A bone-thickness map can serve as an invaluable tool for surgeons, allowing them to identify optimal implant sites, plan surgical strategies and ensure the long-term success of the implant [2].

Description

To understand the importance of a bone-thickness map, it is first necessary to explore the anatomy of the temporal bone. The temporal bone is located on the sides of the skull, forming part of the cranial structure that protects the brain and houses important auditory and balance systems. It can be divided into several key regions: the squamous part, the mastoid process, the petrous part and the tympanic part. Each of these regions has varying bone densities and structures, influencing the suitability for implant anchoring. The mastoid process, for example, is less dense than the petrous part of the temporal bone, which houses the cochlea and vestibular system. Surgical procedures targeting these areas need to account for these variations to ensure proper implant fixation [3].

The development of bone-thickness maps relies on advanced imaging techniques, including high-resolution CT (Computed Tomography) scans, MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) and 3D reconstruction software. CT scans are particularly effective in visualizing bone density, providing detailed images that allow for the precise measurement of bone thickness in different parts of the temporal bone. To create a bone-thickness map, a 3D model of the temporal bone is first generated using high-resolution CT scan data. Software tools are then used to extract information about the bone’s geometry and density, producing a detailed map that can be analyzed to identify areas with the appropriate bone thickness for implant placement. These maps can then be used by surgeons to plan their approach, taking into account variations in bone thickness that might influence implant positioning and stability [4].

In the context of bone-anchored port implantation, surgical planning is a critical step that can determine the success or failure of the procedure. Surgeons traditionally rely on their experience and intraoperative assessments to choose the optimal site for implant placement. However, this approach can sometimes lead to complications, especially in cases where bone thickness is less uniform than expected. With the introduction of a bone-thickness map, surgeons are able to make more informed decisions about where to place the implant. For instance, areas of thicker bone are generally preferred for implant anchorage due to their ability to provide more support. Additionally, a map allows the surgeon to avoid areas with thin or compromised bone, reducing the risk of implant failure or injury to vital structures [5].

Conclsuion

This study demonstrates the potential of bone-thickness maps as a valuable tool for bone-anchored port implantation in the temporal bone. By offering a detailed visualization of bone thickness across the temporal bone, these maps allow surgeons to make more informed decisions regarding implant placement, thus improving the accuracy and safety of the procedure. The use of imaging technologies such as high-resolution CT scans and 3D modeling plays a pivotal role in creating these maps, which are essential for surgical planning. The introduction of bone-thickness maps into clinical practice could revolutionize the way temporal bone surgeries are performed. With a more precise understanding of bone density, surgeons will be better equipped to minimize complications and optimize outcomes for patients undergoing bone-anchored port implantation. Personalized treatment, based on an individual’s unique bone structure, is likely to become a key feature of modern surgical procedures. Furthermore, as the technology surrounding 3D imaging and bone-thickness mapping continues to improve, the accuracy and accessibility of these tools are expected to expand. This could lead to broader adoption in clinical settings, making advanced surgical planning more routine and reducing the risks associated with traditional approaches.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Bernhard, Hans, Christof Stieger and Yves Perriard. "Design of a semi-implantable hearing device for direct acoustic cochlear stimulation." IEEE Trans Biomed Eng (2010): 420-428.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at 

2. Fayad, Jose N., Georges B. Wanna, Jennifer N. Micheletto and Simon C. Parisier. "Facial nerve paralysis following cochlear implant surgery." The Laryngoscope 113 (2003): 1344-1346.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at 

3. Thiel, W. "The preservation of the whole corpse with natural color." Ann Anat 174 (1992): 185-195.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at 

4. Hol, Myrthe KS, Rik C. Nelissen, Martijn JH Agterberg and Cor WRJ Cremers, et al "Comparison between a new implantable transcutaneous bone conductor and percutaneous bone-conduction hearing implant." Otology & Neurotology 34(2013): 1071-1075.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at 

5. Westaby, Stephen, Robert Jarvik andrew Freeland AND David Pigott et AL "Postauricular percutaneous power delivery for permanent mechanical circulatory support J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123(2002): 977-983.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at