Breaking the Stigma Exploring Bipolar Disorder and Promoting Acceptance

Centmier Labusen^*
*Correspondence: Centmier Labusen, Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy, Email:

Keywords

Bipolar disorder • Mental health • Understanding

Introduction

In a world that often views mental health through a narrow lens of misunderstanding and stigma, it's essential to shine a light on conditions like bipolar disorder. Bipolar disorder, formerly known as manic-depressive illness, is a mental health condition characterized by extreme mood swings that include emotional highs and lows. Despite affecting millions worldwide, it remains one of the most stigmatized mental health disorders. This article delves into the complexities of bipolar disorder, explores the stigma surrounding it, and advocates for greater understanding and acceptance. Bipolar disorder is a complex condition that affects individuals differently. It's not just about occasional mood swings; rather, it involves significant shifts in mood, energy, and behavior that can disrupt daily life. There are several types of bipolar disorder, including Bipolar I, Bipolar II, and Cyclothymic Disorder, each characterized by varying degrees of mood episodes. This type involves manic episodes that last at least seven days or are severe enough to require immediate hospitalization. Depressive episodes typically occur as well, lasting at least two weeks. In this type, depressive episodes are more frequent and severe, while manic episodes are less extreme, known as hypomania. This is a milder form of bipolar disorder characterized by numerous periods of hypomanic symptoms and depressive symptoms lasting for at least two years. Elevated mood, increased energy, decreased need for sleep, racing thoughts, impulsivity, and risky behavior. Persistent sadness, loss of interest or pleasure in activities, changes in appetite or weight, difficulty concentrating, feelings of worthlessness or guilt, and thoughts of death or suicide [1].

Literature Review

The causes of bipolar disorder are not entirely understood but are believed to involve a combination of genetic, environmental, and neurological factors. Stressful life events, substance abuse, and imbalances in neurotransmitters like serotonin and dopamine may also contribute to its onset. Despite its prevalence, bipolar disorder continues to be stigmatized and misunderstood by society. Stigma refers to negative attitudes and beliefs that lead to discrimination and prejudice against individuals with mental health conditions. This stigma can manifest in various ways, including social isolation, employment discrimination, and reluctance to seek treatment. One of the primary reasons for the stigma surrounding bipolar disorder is misinformation and stereotypes perpetuated by the media and popular culture. Depictions of individuals with bipolar disorder as unpredictable or dangerous contribute to fear and misunderstanding. Additionally, the language used to describe the condition, such as "crazy" or "mentally unstable," further reinforces negative perceptions. Furthermore, the invisibility of bipolar disorder symptoms during periods of stability can lead others to dismiss the severity of the condition. Unlike physical illnesses with visible symptoms, mental health disorders are often misunderstood or invalidated, leading to feelings of shame and isolation for those affected. Breaking the stigma surrounding bipolar disorder requires a multifaceted approach that involves education, advocacy, and compassion. By promoting acceptance and understanding, we can create a more inclusive and supportive environment for individuals living with bipolar disorder [2].

Discussion

Education is key to challenging misconceptions and dispelling myths about bipolar disorder. Providing accurate information about the condition, its symptoms, and available treatments can help reduce fear and stigma. This education should be targeted not only at the general public but also at healthcare professionals, employers, and policymakers to ensure that support systems are in place. Advocacy plays a crucial role in influencing societal attitudes and policies towards mental health. By speaking out against discrimination and advocating for equal access to healthcare and employment opportunities, we can create a more equitable society for individuals with bipolar disorder. This includes fighting against insurance discrimination, ensuring mental health parity laws are enforced, and promoting anti-stigma campaigns. Compassion and empathy are fundamental to supporting individuals with bipolar disorder. Instead of judgment or ostracism, they need understanding and acceptance from their communities. By listening without judgment, offering support, and validating their experiences, we can help reduce feelings of shame and isolation. Furthermore, destigmatizing language surrounding bipolar disorder is essential in promoting acceptance. Using person-first language, such as "person with bipolar disorder" rather than "bipolar person," emphasizes the individual's humanity rather than defining them by their condition. Additionally, refraining from using derogatory terms or stereotypes helps create a more respectful and inclusive dialogue. Building supportive communities for individuals with bipolar disorder is essential for fostering acceptance and resilience. Support groups, both in-person and online, provide a safe space for individuals to share their experiences, receive validation, and learn coping strategies. Peer support can be incredibly empowering and help combat feelings of isolation [3].

In addition to peer support, access to mental health services is critical for individuals with bipolar disorder. This includes psychotherapy, medication management, and psychiatric care tailored to their unique needs. Unfortunately, barriers such as cost, stigma, and lack of resources can prevent individuals from accessing the care they need. Addressing these barriers requires investment in mental health services and greater integration of mental health into primary care settings. Employers also play a crucial role in supporting individuals with bipolar disorder in the workplace. Providing accommodations, such as flexible work hours or telecommuting options, can help individuals manage their symptoms while remaining productive. Educating managers and coworkers about bipolar disorder and mental health in general can foster a supportive work environment free from discrimination [4]. Moreover, it's crucial to recognize the resilience and strength of individuals living with bipolar disorder. Despite facing numerous challenges, many individuals with bipolar disorder lead fulfilling and productive lives. By highlighting stories of resilience and recovery, we can inspire hope and reduce feelings of hopelessness and despair often associated with the condition. Research into bipolar disorder is ongoing, leading to advancements in treatment and understanding. However, progress in combating stigma and promoting acceptance is equally important. It's not enough to have effective treatments if individuals feel too ashamed or afraid to seek help. As a society, we must prioritize mental health education and destigmatization efforts. This includes integrating mental health curriculum into schools, training healthcare professionals to provide culturally sensitive care, and fostering open conversations about mental health in communities [5,6].

Conclsuion

Bipolar disorder is a complex mental health condition that affects millions of individuals worldwide. Despite its prevalence, stigma and discrimination continue to pose significant barriers to treatment and support. Breaking the stigma surrounding bipolar disorder requires education, advocacy, and compassion. By promoting acceptance and understanding, we can create a more inclusive society where individuals with bipolar disorder feel valued and supported. Together, we can challenge misconceptions, advocate for equal rights, and build communities that prioritize mental health and well-being. Furthermore, media representation plays a significant role in shaping public perceptions of mental health. By depicting individuals with bipolar disorder in a nuanced and empathetic manner, media can help challenge stereotypes and humanize the condition. Additionally, amplifying the voices of individuals with lived experience can provide valuable insights and perspectives.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest by author.

References

1. Stubbs, Brendon, Davy Vancampfort, Marco Solmi and Nicola Veronese, et al. "How common is bipolar disorder in general primary care attendees? A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating prevalence determined according to structured clinical assessments." Aust N Z J Psychiatry 50 (2016): 631-639.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Hayes, Joseph F., Louise Marston, Kate Walters and Michael B. King, et al. "Mortality gap for people with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: UK-based cohort study 2000–2014." Br J Psychiatry 211 (2017): 175-181.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Osborn, David PJ, Gus Levy, Irwin Nazareth and Irene Petersen, et al. "Relative risk of cardiovascular and cancer mortality in people with severe mental illness from the United Kingdom's general practice research database." Arch Gen Psychiatry 64 (2007): 242-249.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Stubbs, Brendon, Julie Williams, Fiona Gaughran and Tom Craig. "How sedentary are people with psychosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis." Schizophr Res 171 (2016): 103-109.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Mishu, Masuma Pervin, Emily J. Peckham, Paul N. Heron and Garry A. Tew, et al. "Factors associated with regular physical activity participation among people with severe mental ill health." Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 54 (2019): 887-895.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Tew, Garry A., Katherine Jones and Antonina Mikocka-Walus. "Physical activity habits, limitations, and predictors in people with inflammatory bowel disease: A large cross-sectional online survey." Inflamm Bowel Dis 22 (2016): 2933-2942.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at