Building Resilient Agroecosystems: The Role of Biological Control in Climate Change Adaptation

Queenta Hoyle^*
*Correspondence: Queenta Hoyle, Department of Agronomy, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan, Email:

Keywords

Biological control • Climate change adaptation • Agroecosystems • Pest management • Sustainable agriculture • Biodiversity • Beneficial insects • Microorganisms • Ecological balance • Resilience

Introduction

Agriculture, being highly dependent on climatic conditions, is facing unprecedented challenges due to climate change. Global warming, altered precipitation patterns and increased frequency of extreme weather events are impacting crop yields, soil fertility and overall agricultural productivity. To mitigate these adverse effects and maintain food security, it is imperative to build resilient agroecosystems that can withstand and adapt to the changing climate. One promising approach that offers potential solutions is biological control, a method that harnesses natural enemies to manage pests and maintain ecological balance in agricultural landscapes. Biological control, also known as biocontrol, involves the use of living organisms to control pests and diseases in agroecosystems. These natural enemies include beneficial insects, nematodes, mites, microorganisms and even larger organisms like birds and bats. The fundamental idea is to enhance and preserve the existing biodiversity within the agroecosystem, thereby reducing the dominance of pests and promoting a harmonious balance among various species [1].

Biological control contributes to climate change adaptation by encouraging biodiversity within agricultural landscapes. Monoculture systems, which are vulnerable to pests and diseases, can be transformed into diversified agroecosystems. By incorporating different crops, planting hedgerows and preserving natural habitats, farmers can attract and retain beneficial organisms that act as natural predators of pests. This leads to reduced pest pressure, minimizing the need for chemical pesticides and safeguarding the health of both crops and ecosystems. One of the major advantages of biological control is its potential to reduce reliance on chemical pesticides. Pesticides not only harm the targeted pests but also have detrimental effects on non-target organisms, soil health and water quality. By adopting biological control methods, farmers can reduce pesticide use, lowering their environmental footprint and mitigating the risks associated with chemical exposure [2].

Literature Review

Biological control employs various beneficial insects like ladybugs, lacewings and parasitic wasps, which prey on pests, keeping their populations in check. Additionally, microorganisms like bacteria, fungi and viruses can be utilized as biopesticides to control specific pests effectively. By understanding the ecology of these organisms, farmers can deploy them strategically to maintain pest populations at tolerable levels. Apart from introducing natural enemies, cultural practices can be employed to encourage biological control. Crop rotation, intercropping and maintaining suitable habitats for beneficial organisms can create a favorable environment for them to thrive. Moreover, the conservation of natural enemies' alternative food sources during the noncrop season ensures their survival and promotes long-term pest management [3].

As climate change continues to pose challenges to global agriculture, adopting sustainable and climate-resilient practices is of utmost importance. Biological control emerges as a valuable tool for climate change adaptation in agroecosystems. By embracing biodiversity, minimizing chemical pesticide use and harnessing the power of beneficial organisms, farmers can enhance their resilience and secure food production in a changing climate. Policymakers and researchers must support and promote the adoption of biological control practices to pave the way for a sustainable and climate-resilient future in agriculture. While biological control holds significant promise for building resilient agroecosystems, there are several challenges that need to be addressed to scale up its adoption effectively. One of the primary obstacles to implementing biological control is the lack of awareness and knowledge among farmers and agricultural practitioners [4].

Many farmers may not be familiar with the concept of biological control or the specific practices involved. Raising awareness through farmer training programs, extension services and educational campaigns is crucial to ensure its successful adoption. Developing a clear and supportive regulatory framework for biopesticides is crucial. The approval process for biopesticides should be streamlined, ensuring that safe and effective products can reach the market quickly. This will encourage more companies to invest in research and development, fostering innovation in the field of biological control. Continuous monitoring and evaluation are necessary to assess the effectiveness of biological control methods and make necessary adjustments. This involves collecting data on pest populations, natural enemy abundance and crop yields. Farmers, researchers and policymakers can use this data to refine their strategies and maximize the benefits of biological control [5].

Discussion

Convincing farmers to adopt new practices can be challenging, especially when they have been relying on traditional methods for years. Demonstrating the success of biological control through pilot projects and showcasing success stories from early adopters can encourage other farmers to take up these sustainable practices. Understanding the interactions between beneficial microorganisms and pests can lead to the development of targeted and highly effective biopesticides. Researchers can explore the microbial diversity in different agroecosystems and identify key players that can regulate pest populations.

Advancements in biotechnology offer the potential to genetically enhance beneficial organisms and improve their pest control capabilities. Researchers can explore methods like gene editing to make natural enemies more effective in combating specific pests. Developing climate-specific biological control strategies can optimize pest management in different regions. As climate change impacts vary from one location to another, tailoring biological control practices accordingly can enhance their effectiveness. Utilizing artificial intelligence and data analytics can help identify patterns and correlations in pest outbreaks and natural enemy dynamics. Such data-driven approaches can aid in predicting pest incidents and guiding timely interventions [6].

Conclusion

Building resilient agroecosystems is essential to mitigate the impacts of climate change on global food production. Biological control presents a sustainable and nature-friendly approach to managing pests, enhancing biodiversity and supporting climate change adaptation in agriculture. By addressing the challenges and seizing the opportunities, policymakers, researchers and farmers can work together to promote the adoption of biological control, fostering sustainable agriculture and securing food supplies for future generations. Embracing this natural approach to pest management is a crucial step towards a more resilient and climate-resilient agricultural future. Advancing the field of biological control requires continuous research and technical support. Scientists and researchers must explore new methods, study the interactions between pests and their natural enemies and develop effective biopesticides. Moreover, providing technical assistance to farmers in integrating biological control into their farming practices can optimize its benefits. Biopesticides, such as those based on beneficial microorganisms, can be expensive to produce and distribute. Ensuring affordable access to these biopesticides for farmers is essential for their widespread adoption. Government support, subsidies, or incentives can play a vital role in making these products more accessible.

Acknowledgement

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticisms of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares there is no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript.

References

1. Greeff-Laubscher, Mariska Riana, Ilze Beukes, Gert Johannes Marais and Karin Jacobs. "Mycotoxin production by three different toxigenic fungi genera on formulated abalone feed and the effect of an aquatic environment on fumonisins."Mycology11 (2020): 105-117.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Bedre, Renesh, Kanniah Rajasekaran, Venkata Ramanarao Mangu and Luis Eduardo Sanchez Timm, et al. "Genome-wide transcriptome analysis of cotton (G. hirsutum L.) identifies candidate gene signatures in response to aflatoxin producing fungus A. flavus."PLoS One10 (2015): e0138025.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Fouché, Tanya, Sarina Claassens and Mark Maboeta. "Aflatoxins in the soil ecosystem: An overview of its occurrence, fate, effects and future perspectives."Mycotoxin Res36 (2020): 303-309.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Kwon-Chung, Kyung J. and Janyce A. Sugui. "A. fumigatus—what makes the species a ubiquitous human fungal pathogen?."PLoS Pathog9 (2013): e1003743.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Mueller-Cajar, Oliver and Spencer M. Whitney. "Directing the evolution of Rubisco and Rubisco activase: First impressions of a new tool for photosynthesis research."Photosynth Res98 (2008): 667-675.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Maier, Alexandra, Holger Fahnenstich, Susanne Von Caemmerer and Martin KM Engqvist, et al. "Transgenic introduction of a glycolate oxidative cycle into A. thaliana chloroplasts leads to growth improvement."Front Plant Sci 3 (2012): 38.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at