GET THE APP

Cardiac Biomarkers During Cancer Therapy
..

Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis

ISSN: 2155-9929

Open Access

Perspective - (2022) Volume 13, Issue 8

Cardiac Biomarkers During Cancer Therapy

Leticia Cano*
*Correspondence: Leticia Cano, President Biomarker Profiles Corporation, Leticia Cano, USA, Email:
President Biomarker Profiles Corporation, Leticia Cano, USA

Received: 28-Jul-2022, Manuscript No. jmbd-22-77501; Editor assigned: 01-Aug-2022, Pre QC No. P-77501; Reviewed: 10-Aug-2022, QC No. Q-77501; Revised: 15-Aug-2022, Manuscript No. R-77501; Published: 21-Aug-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2155-9929.2022.13.536
Citation: Cano, Leticia. “Cardiac Biomarkers during Cancer Therapy." J Mol Biomark Diagn 13 (2022): 536.
Copyright: © 2022 Cano L. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Combination therapies for cancer treatment have significantly improved clinical outcomes. Simultaneously, there has been a greater focus on the acute, chronic and late effects of treatment, including the management of cardiac disease in cancer patients. Traditional cardiovascular tests, such as electrocardiography (ECG) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), are known to have low sensitivity and specificity for early detection of myocardial injury.

Elevated pre-chemotherapy cardiac biomarkers can detect underlying myocardial injury and stress, as well as aid in risk stratification and medical optimization before and during cancer therapy. NPs and troponin may detect congestion and injury during and after anthracycline-based cardiotoxic cancer therapy, regardless of detectable changes in LVEF.

Description

A biomarker must be accurate, easy to measure and provide important information about treatment outcome in order to be useful. A prognostic biomarker predicts the course of a disease regardless of treatment, whereas a predictive biomarker predicts the likely response to a specific treatment. It is critical to comprehend the clinical implications of an abnormal cardiac biomarker and how this information can be used to guide treatment decision [1].

Identifying the potential causes of psychological anguish and then resolving to take efforts to reduce or overcome it is the first stage in effective dealing with psychological distress. This may entail psychiatric counselling in order to identify the source of the psychological suffering. A psychiatrist, psychologist, or other mental health practitioner may recommend a variety of therapeutic treatments to assist relieve psychological discomfort as part of the counselling.

Blood cells are a great source of genomic materials as well as immune phenotyping. However, biomarkers derived from these sources may lack specificity for cardiac pathology and exhibit wide variability and poor reproducibility, owing in part to the multiorgan effects of cancer treatments [2]. Directly obtained biomarkers from cardiac tissue provide tissue-specific and physiologic information; however, these samples are frequently difficult to obtain due to procedural risk and cost. Cardiovascular cells derived from iPSCs are cardiac-specific, albeit immature. They can be cultured in a dish with an almost infinite supply of cells, allowing for serial collection without invasive procedures or additional clinical sampling.

Given the wide variation in interindividual susceptibility, genomic influence on the risk of cancer therapy-induced cardiotoxicity has been actively researched. Garcia-Pavia et al. sequenced putative DCM genes and discovered an increased prevalence of TTN-truncating variants in cardiotoxicity cases, hypothesising a shared genetic risk between DCM and cancertherapyinduced cardiotoxicity [3-5].

Conclusion

A genome-wide association study (GWAS) in 280 European ancestry patients treated with anthracyclines (32 cases, 248 controls) and identified a protein-altering variant in RARG that was highly associated with cardiotoxicity; findings validated in other cohorts and independently supported by investigations using patient-specific and genome-edited iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest by author.

References

  1. Shiode, Nobuo, Nobuyuki Morishima, Kensyo Nakayama and Togo Yamagata, et al. "Flow-mediated vasodilation of human epicardial coronary arteries: effect of inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis." J Am Coll Cardiol 27 (1996): 304-310.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Alsaied, Tarek, Jouke P. Bokma, Mark E. Engel and Joey M. Kuijpers, et al. "Factors associated with long-term mortality after Fontan procedures: a systematic review." Heart 103 (2017): 104-110.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Alsoufi, Bahaaldin, Scott Gillespie, Dennis Kim and Kirk Kanter, et al. "The impact of dominant ventricle morphology on palliation outcomes of single ventricle anomalies." Ann Thora Surg 102 (2016): 593-601.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Alsoufi, Bahaaldin, Cedric Manlhiot, Abid Awan and Fadel Alfadley, et al. "Current outcomes of the Glenn bidirectional cavopulmonary connection for single ventricle palliation." Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 42 (2012): 42-49.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Anderson, Page A.W., Lynn A. Sleeper, Lynn Mahon and Steven D. Colan, et al. "Contemporary outcomes after the Fontan procedure: a Pediatric Heart Network multicenter study." J Am Coll Cardiol 52 (2008): 85-98.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 2054

Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis received 2054 citations as per Google Scholar report

Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward