Mini Review - (2024) Volume 8, Issue 1
Received: 01-Jan-2024, Manuscript No. jigc-24-131999;
Editor assigned: 03-Jan-2024, Pre QC No. P-131999;
Reviewed: 15-Jan-2024, QC No. Q-131999;
Revised: 20-Jan-2024, Manuscript No. R-131999;
Published:
30-Jan-2024
, DOI: 10.37421/2684-4591.2024.8.226
Citation: Teman, Nicholas. “Cardio Protective Mechanisms
against Reperfusion Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Targeting Angiotensin
II Receptors.” J Interv Gen Cardiol 8 (2024): 226.
Copyright: © 2024 Teman N. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) is a life-threatening condition characterized by the sudden interruption of blood flow to the heart muscle, leading to tissue damage and potentially fatal outcomes. Reperfusion therapy, aimed at restoring blood flow to the affected area, is the primary intervention for AMI. However, paradoxically, the process of reperfusion itself can induce additional injury, known as reperfusion injury. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of reperfusion injury is crucial for developing effective cardio protective strategies. This article explores the role of angiotensin II receptors in reperfusion injury and discusses potential therapeutic interventions targeting these receptors for cardioprotection in AMI.
Myocardial • Cardio • Reperfusion therapy • Paradoxically
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, necessitating urgent intervention to restore blood flow to the ischemic myocardium. Reperfusion therapy, typically achieved through percutaneous coronary intervention or thrombolytic therapy is essential for salvaging viable myocardium and improving clinical outcomes. However, reperfusion itself can paradoxically exacerbate tissue damage through a phenomenon known as reperfusion injury. This article delves into the intricate mechanisms of reperfusion injury and explores the potential of targeting angiotensin II receptors as a therapeutic strategy for cardio protection in AMI [1,2].
Reperfusion injury encompasses a complex cascade of pathophysiological processes, including oxidative stress, inflammation, calcium overload, mitochondrial dysfunction, and endothelial dysfunction. Upon reperfusion, the abrupt restoration of oxygen delivery leads to the generation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and subsequent oxidative stress, contributing to cellular damage and apoptosis. Furthermore, the influx of calcium ions into cardiomyocytes during reperfusion disrupts mitochondrial function and triggers cell death pathways. In addition to oxidative stress and calcium overload, reperfusion injury is characterized by the activation of inflammatory pathways and endothelial dysfunction. Neutrophil infiltration and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines exacerbate tissue damage, while endothelial dysfunction impairs microvascular perfusion and promotes thrombosis. Collectively, these mechanisms contribute to myocardial injury and adverse remodeling following reperfusion in AMI [3].
The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS) plays a pivotal role in cardiovascular homeostasis and is implicated in the pathogenesis of AMI and heart failure. Angiotensin II, a key effector peptide of the RAAS, exerts its physiological effects through binding to specific receptors, primarily Angiotensin II Type 1 (AT1) and Type 2 (AT2) receptors. Emerging evidence suggests that dysregulation of the angiotensin II signaling pathway contributes to reperfusion injury in AMI. Activation of AT1 receptors by angiotensin II mediates vasoconstriction, sodium retention, and pro-inflammatory effects, thereby exacerbating myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury. Conversely, AT2 receptors exhibit opposing effects, including vasodilation, anti-inflammatory actions, and modulation of oxidative stress. Imbalance in AT1/AT2 receptor signaling may disrupt the delicate equilibrium of cardiovascular homeostasis and predispose the myocardium to reperfusion injury [4].
Given the central role of angiotensin II receptors in mediating reperfusion injury, pharmacological interventions targeting these receptors hold promise for cardio protection in AMI. Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs), Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs), and novel AT1 receptor antagonists have been investigated for their potential to mitigate reperfusion injury and improve clinical outcomes [5].
ACEIs and ARBs inhibit the production or action of angiotensin II, thereby attenuating vasoconstriction, inflammation, and oxidative stress. Clinical trials such as the VALIANT trial have demonstrated the efficacy of ARBs in reducing mortality and hospitalization following AMI, suggesting a potential role in cardio protection against reperfusion injury. Moreover, selective modulation of AT1 receptors with novel antagonists offers a promising approach for enhancing cardioprotective effects while minimizing off-target effects. Preclinical studies utilizing AT1 receptor antagonists such as losartan and candesartan have shown favorable outcomes in reducing infarct size, preserving cardiac function, and attenuating adverse remodeling in AMI models [6].
Reperfusion injury remains a significant challenge in the management of acute myocardial infarction, necessitating the development of effective cardio protective strategies. Targeting angiotensin II receptors represents a promising therapeutic approach for mitigating reperfusion injury and improving outcomes in AMI patients. Further research is warranted to elucidate the optimal timing, dosing, and combination therapies to maximize the cardio protective effects of angiotensin II receptor modulation in the clinical setting. By unraveling the intricate mechanisms of reperfusion injury and harnessing the therapeutic potential of angiotensin II receptors, clinicians can advance towards more effective management strategies for AMI and ultimately improve patient outcomes.
None.
None.
Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at
Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at
Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at
Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at
Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at
Journal of Interventional and General Cardiology received 11 citations as per Google Scholar report