Cement Recycling Method Could Help Solve One of the World\'s Biggest Climate Challenges

Brown Madhina^*
*Correspondence: Brown Madhina, Department of Material Engineering, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA, Email:

Keywords

Recycling • Climate • Infrastructure

Introduction

Cement production involves the calcination of limestone calcium carbonate in kilns at temperatures. This process releases carbon dioxide both from the combustion of fossil fuels and the chemical transformation of limestone into clinker. In addition to CO₂ emissions, the cement industry consumes vast amounts of natural resources, including limestone, clay, and energy. The environmental footprint of cement production is further exacerbated by the generation of large volumes of waste during construction, demolition, and renovation activities [1].

Literature Review

One of the most significant benefits of cement recycling is the reduction in CO₂ emissions. By reusing existing cementitious materials, the need for new clinker production is decreased, leading to lower carbon emissions. Studies suggest that cement recycling can reduce CO₂ emissions by up to 60% compared to traditional cement production methods. Cement recycling conserves natural resources such as limestone and clay, which are non-renewable and finite. By recycling concrete, the demand for these raw materials is reduced, thereby preserving natural landscapes and reducing the environmental impact of mining activities. The production of new clinker is highly energy-intensive. Cement recycling reduces the need for energy consumption associated with the calcination process. This energy saving translates into lower fossil fuel use and a reduction in the associated greenhouse gas emissions. Recycling cementitious materials helps in managing construction and demolition waste, which is a significant environmental challenge. By diverting concrete waste from landfills, cement recycling contributes to more sustainable waste management practices and reduces landfill use and associated environmental problems [2].

Cement recycling can also offer economic benefits by reducing the costs associated with raw material extraction, transportation, and waste disposal. The use of recycled materials can lower construction costs and make sustainable building practices more economically viable [3]. Ensuring the quality and consistency of recycled cementitious materials is crucial for their effective use in new concrete. Variability in the properties of recycled aggregates can affect the strength and durability of the new concrete, posing a challenge for engineers and builders. Construction and demolition waste often contain contaminants such as asbestos, lead, and other hazardous materials. Proper sorting and cleaning of the recycled materials are essential to prevent these contaminants from compromising the quality and safety of the new concrete. Current technologies for cement recycling are still evolving, and there are limitations in terms of efficiency and scalability. Advancements in recycling technologies are needed to improve the rehydration process and ensure the reactivity of recycled cementitious materials [4].

Regulatory frameworks and market acceptance play a significant role in the adoption of cement recycling. Building codes and standards need to accommodate the use of recycled materials, and there must be incentives for the construction industry to embrace sustainable practices. Carbonation curing is an innovative technique that involves curing recycled concrete aggregates with CO₂. This process not only enhances the strength and durability of the recycled concrete but also sequesters CO₂, further reducing the carbon footprint. The use of advanced sorting technologies, such as automated sorting systems and AI-based quality control, can improve the efficiency and accuracy of separating contaminants from recycled concrete aggregates [5].

Discussion

The future of cement recycling holds great promise for addressing one of the world’s biggest climate challenges. As technologies advance and regulatory frameworks evolve, the adoption of cement recycling is expected to increase. Collaborative efforts between industry stakeholders, researchers, and policymakers are essential to overcome the existing challenges and promote the widespread use of recycled cementitious materials. Researchers are exploring the use of alternative binders, such as fly ash, slag, and silica fume, in combination with recycled cementitious materials. These alternative binders can enhance the properties of the recycled concrete and reduce reliance on traditional cement. Chemical activation involves the use of chemical agents to enhance the reactivity of recycled cementitious materials. This process can improve the binding properties of recycled cement and make it more suitable for use in new concrete mixtures [6].

Conclusion

Cement recycling offers a viable solution to reduce the environmental impact of cement production and contribute to global climate change mitigation efforts. By lowering CO₂ emissions, conserving natural resources, saving energy, managing waste, and providing economic benefits, cement recycling represents a sustainable approach to building a greener future. As the world continues to seek innovative ways to address climate change, the potential of cement recycling to transform the construction industry and reduce its carbon footprint cannot be overlooked. Embracing this sustainable practice will be a crucial step toward achieving a more sustainable and resilient built environment.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Wu, Yunyun, Haodong Ji, Qiming Liu and Zhaoyang Sun, et al. "Visible light photocatalytic degradation of sulfanilamide enhanced by Mo doping of BiOBr nanoflowers." J Hazard Mater 424 (2022): 127563.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Shylesh, Sankaranarayanapillai, Volker Schünemann and Werner R. Thiel. "Magnetically separable nanocatalysts: Bridges between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis." Angew Chem Int Ed 49 (2010): 3428-3459.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Galindo, Catherine, Patrice Jacques and André Kalt. "Photooxidation of the phenylazonaphthol AO20 on TiO2: Kinetic and mechanistic investigations." Chemosphere 45 (2001): 997-1005.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Ren, Yang, Yun Gao and Gaoyang Zhao. "Facile single-step fabrications of electrochromic WO3 micro-patterned films using the novel photosensitive sol–gel method." Ceram Int 41 (2015): 403-408.

Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Chi, Yue, Qing Yuan, Yanjuan Li and Liang Zhao, et al. "Magnetically separable Fe3O4@ SiO2@ TiO2-Ag microspheres with well-designed nanostructure and enhanced photocatalytic activity." J Hazard Mater 262 (2013): 404-411.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Dong, Fan, Weirong Zhao, Zhongbiao Wu and Sen Guo. "Band structure and visible light photocatalytic activity of multi-type nitrogen doped TiO2 nanoparticles prepared by thermal decomposition." J Hazard Mater 162 (2009): 763-770.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at