GET THE APP

Changes in Culture and Institutions and how they affect Economic and Financial Development Paths
..

Accounting & Marketing

ISSN: 2168-9601

Open Access

Mini Review - (2022) Volume 11, Issue 12

Changes in Culture and Institutions and how they affect Economic and Financial Development Paths

Whiker Worth*
*Correspondence: Whiker Worth, Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut, Farmington, USA, Email:
Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut, Farmington, USA

Received: 02-Dec-2022, Manuscript No. Jamk-23-87031; Editor assigned: 03-Dec-2022, Pre QC No. P-87031; Reviewed: 16-Dec-2022, QC No. Q-87031; Revised: 21-Dec-2022, Manuscript No. R-87031; Published: 28-Dec-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2168-9601.2022.11.407
Citation: Worth, Whitaker. “Changes in Culture and Institutions and how they affect Economic and Financial Development Paths.” J Account Mark 11 (2022): 407.
Copyright: © 2022 Worth W. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Non-economic factors that influence macroeconomic dynamics and the development of financial markets include the quality of institutions. Objective factors that accompany the historical process largely shape this quality. As a result, the focus of this study is on the factors that drive this process and how they impact the quality of institutions. It is demonstrated that culture, when viewed in its broadest sense, encompasses not only relevant heritage accumulated at various stages of the historical process but also socially prevalent behavioural attitudes and value beliefs that influence decision-making. Culture is the primary such force or source of institutional change. Through the use of specific historical events, the thesis about the significance of culture as a factor in sustainable economic dynamics and a source of the formation of the quality of national institutions is supported. Economic policy goals of financial development are frequently prioritized over institutional constraints when this conditionality is underestimated. Emerging market economies are primarily characterized by this factor in macroeconomic decision-making. In addition, studies conducted over the past few decades have shown that high-quality institutions have a positive and significant impact on macroeconomic dynamics. Because of this, the article is able to evaluate the quality of institutions and the role that finance plays in the set of state economic policy priorities in a different way.

Keywords

Economic policy • Broadest sense • Macroeconomic dynamics

Introduction

This study presents and supports the thesis that ensuring a high quality of institutions is the most important priority of transforming financial development into a factor of positive and sustainable economic growth when applied to individual countries with obvious deficiencies in the institutional environment. It does this by referring to historical experience as well as contemporary empirical material. Over the past three decades, researchers have investigated the connection between macroeconomic dynamics and financial development. The quality of the institutions that ensure the economy of individual states, their unions, large regional formations, etc., determines the direction and degree of interaction between these processes. It goes without saying that the difficulties of accurately and reliably assessing the threats associated with the state of this parameter, as well as its impact on financial development and growth, are determined by the difficulty of formalizing any qualitative parameter which ought to include institutions. In addition, the empirical evidence and statistical evaluations that are currently available point to the existence of a direct and significant conditionality between financial development and macroeconomic dynamics.

Description

High-quality institutions accompany these processes, resulting in low risks associated with the institutional environment. The study focuses primarily on the quality of institutions in light of these risks, implying that the potential for these risks is inversely proportional to this factor. This factor includes, among other things, the measure of protection of the property rights of economic organizations and citizens, the interests of participants in the investment process, the nature and number of judicial decisions in the economic sphere, and numerous other factors. This quality is identified and evaluated in a variety of ways, including by utilizing economic indicators, which, for instance, demonstrate the magnitude of the country's capital inflow or outflow. This method has both advantages and disadvantages. The advantages include the ease with which estimates and interpretations can be made. In particular, indicators of capital inflow and outflow can be used to determine the quality of the economy's investment climate over time. One of the drawbacks is the possibility of applying economic evaluations, which are more likely to point to the system's opportunistic characteristics, to its fundamental characteristics [1,2].

Assuming assessments of the predominantly legal environment of economic processes, well-established legal traditions that are fixed in the relevant legal regimes also characterize the quality of institutions or institutional risks. Along with political conditions and the degree of centralization that is reflected in financial and macroeconomic decision-making, the legal factor is regarded as a distinct determinant of financial and macroeconomic dynamics. It is directly related to the quality of institutions. The established degree of accumulation of tax and other revenue by the upper level of the budget system reflects these factors. The incorporation of these three factors into distinct units of empirical data and statistical evaluation does not eliminate their institutional background or their reliance on established decision-making practices. In this regard, turning to the past retrospectively is frequently helpful for determining the factors that are stifling the rate of financial development, justifying measures to modernize existing institutions, and creating opportunities to overcome lags in social and economic dynamics. According to demetriade and Law the role of institutions is that financial development has a greater impact on economic growth when the financial system is embedded in a sound institutional structure. When evaluating institutions in a variety of ways and by a variety of organizations, the issue of their quality becomes, if not crucial, at least topical for changing regulatory practices. If sustained and balanced financial development is viewed as a prerequisite for economic growth, then these actions, some of which are focused on factors that are manageable, have the potential to achieve macroeconomic targets [3-5].

Conclusion

To be more specific, the conditionality of financial development by socioeconomic development to be more specific, the problem of the possible opposite direction of the causal relationship seems important to pose without contesting the reliability or practical significance of the estimates of this dependence. The theoretical frameworks of the Marxist, Keynesian, and other related traditions of economic research advocate the subordination of money and even loan capital, which eventually acquires the characteristics of fictional industrial capital. However, this does not diminish the significance of finance in later stages of their expansion. Financial development and economic expansion are interdependent processes, as previously stated. It is essential to acknowledge that the quality of institutions is equally essential for ensuring acceptable economic growth rates and financial development in the context of the issue posed in the article's title. In light of this, the quality of institutions the most significant non-economic factor equally influencing the interests of economic and financial processes is the subject of the discussion that follows.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  1. Li, Jianping. "Risk spillovers between fintech and traditional financial institutions: Evidence from the US." Inter Rev Fin Analysis 71 (2020): 101544.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Amiram, Dan. "Financial reporting fraud and other forms of misconduct: A multidisciplinary review of the literature." Rev Acc Stud 23 (2018): 732-783.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Ngai, Eric WT. "The application of data mining techniques in financial fraud detection: A classification framework and an academic review of literature." Decision Support Sys 50 (2011): 559-569.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Zhu, Xiaoqian. "Balancing accuracy, complexity and interpretability in consumer credit decision making: A C-TOPSIS classification approach." Knowledge-Based Sys 52 (2013): 258-267.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Ahadiat, Nasrollah. "Association between audit opinion and provision of non‐audit services." Inter J Acc Infor Manag (2011).
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 487

Accounting & Marketing received 487 citations as per Google Scholar report

Accounting & Marketing peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward