GET THE APP

Characteristics of Diabetic Amyotrophy in Young Males
..

Journal of Diabetic Complications & Medicine

ISSN: 2475-3211

Open Access

Mini Review - (2023) Volume 8, Issue 3

Characteristics of Diabetic Amyotrophy in Young Males

Raveendar Rao*
*Correspondence: Raveendar Rao, Department of Diabetic Foot Clinic and Diabetic, King’s College Hospital, London, UK, Email:
1Department of Diabetic Foot Clinic and Diabetic, King’s College Hospital, London, UK

Received: 29-May-2023, Manuscript No. jdcm-23-107727; Editor assigned: 01-Jun-2023, Pre QC No. P-107727; Reviewed: 17-Jun-2023, QC No. Q-107727; Revised: 22-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. R-107727; Published: 29-Jun-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2475-3211.2023.8.213
Citation: Rao, Raveendar. “Characteristics of Diabetic Amyotrophy in Young Males.” J Diabetic Complications Med 8 (2023): 213.
Copyright: © 2023 Rao R. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Diabetic Amyotrophy is a relatively rare neurological disorder that primarily affects the motor neurons in the limbs. It is characterized by asymmetric muscle wasting and weakness, with a notable inclination towards upper limb involvement in the majority of cases. This condition has been observed to predominantly affect young males, making it an intriguing area of study for researchers and healthcare professionals alike. Monomelic Amyotrophy, also known as Hirayama disease or juvenile non-progressive amyotrophy, is a clinical syndrome that leads to muscle atrophy and weakness, typically affecting only one limb. The condition was first described by Dr. Keizo Hirayama in 1959 and since then, various research studies have attempted to elucidate its etiology and pathophysiology.

Literature Review

One striking characteristic of Monomelic Amyotrophy is its tendency to affect young males predominantly. Although the exact reason for this male preponderance remains unclear, it has been a consistent observation in many reported cases. This unique demographic distribution has sparked investigations into potential genetic and hormonal factors that may contribute to the development of MMA. Another distinctive feature of MMA is the asymmetrical distribution of muscle weakness and wasting, with upper limb involvement being more common than the lower limbs. Patients often report weakness and wasting in one arm, typically the dominant limb, while the other arm remains relatively unaffected. This pattern of asymmetric weakness poses diagnostic challenges and can sometimes lead to misdiagnosis, especially in the early stages [1].

Discussion

Despite being an area of active research, the exact cause of Monomelic Amyotrophy remains uncertain. Several hypotheses have been proposed, including vascular, compressive and immunological mechanisms. One of the leading theories suggests that mechanical stress on the cervical spinal cord during neck flexion could lead to alterations in the blood supply to the anterior horn cells, resulting in the characteristic motor neuron degeneration seen in MMA. Due to its rarity and the variability of symptoms, diagnosing Monomelic Amyotrophy can be challenging. The condition is often misdiagnosed initially as other neuromuscular disorders, such as motor neuron disease, cervical spondylosis, or even brachial plexopathy. A comprehensive evaluation, including a detailed medical history, physical examination, electromyography and neuroimaging, is essential to arrive at an accurate diagnosis and rule out other potential causes of limb weakness [2].

As Monomelic Amyotrophy is non-progressive, the prognosis is generally favorable, especially when diagnosed early. While there is no specific cure for MMA, symptomatic management and physical therapy can significantly improve a patient's quality of life. The goal of treatment is to maintain muscle strength, prevent contractures and address any functional limitations caused by the condition. Monomelic Amyotrophy remains a captivating and challenging condition, primarily due to its predominant occurrence in young males and its asymmetric upper limb involvement. As research advances and our understanding of the disease improves, we hope to unravel the underlying mechanisms responsible for MMA and develop more effective management strategies for affected individuals. Early recognition and appropriate management are crucial in mitigating the impact of this neurological disorder on patients' lives [3].

Monomelic Amyotrophy continues to perplex researchers and medical professionals with its unique clinical presentation and distinct characteristics. Recent studies have shed light on two crucial aspects of this enigmatic neurological disorder: the normalcy of MRI findings in most patients and the absence of evidence linking viral infections to MMA. These findings provide valuable insights into the pathophysiology and diagnosis of MMA, advancing our understanding of this intriguing condition. Magnetic Resonance Imaging is a powerful non-invasive imaging technique that allows for detailed visualization of the central nervous system. In the context of Monomelic Amyotrophy, MRI scans of the cervical cord play a vital role in ruling out compressive or structural abnormalities that could potentially lead to limb weakness and wasting.

In a comprehensive study examining MMA patients, intriguing results emerged: the MRI of the cervical cord was found to be normal in the vast majority of cases, specifically in approximately 67.9% of patients. This finding has significant implications as it indicates that the pathophysiological mechanisms behind MMA may not involve direct compression or structural damage to the cervical spinal cord. Instead, it strengthens the hypothesis that other factors, such as vascular compromise or immunological processes, might be at play in the development of this condition. The etiology of Monomelic Amyotrophy remains an unsolved puzzle, with numerous theories and hypotheses being explored. One area of investigation that has garnered attention is the potential association of viral infections with the onset or progression of MMA. Viral infections have been implicated in other neurological conditions, making them a relevant avenue for exploration in MMA as well [4].

However, after an exhaustive examination of patients in the study, no evidence of a direct association between viral infections and MMA was found. While this finding may appear surprising, it serves as a stepping stone for researchers to investigate other potential triggers and causative factors that might lead to the selective motor neuron degeneration observed in MMA. The revelations from these studies have crucial implications for diagnosing and managing patients with Monomelic Amyotrophy. With MRI of the cervical cord being a standard diagnostic tool for excluding other spinal cord-related conditions, the confirmation of normal findings in a majority of MMA cases reinforces the importance of differentiating this condition from other diseases with similar presentations [5,6].

Conclusion

Furthermore, ruling out viral infections as a significant contributor to the development of MMA directs future research efforts toward exploring alternative mechanisms, such as genetic predisposition, autoimmune responses, or environmental triggers. This, in turn, could lead to the development of targeted therapies and more effective management strategies for MMA. As researchers delve deeper into the complexities of Monomelic Amyotrophy, the importance of these recent findings cannot be overstated. Understanding that the cervical cord MRI is normal in a substantial proportion of patients and that viral infections are not linked to MMA helps refine our diagnostic approaches and narrow down potential causes. These discoveries inspire hope that one day we may unravel the full intricacies of this perplexing neurological condition, ultimately leading to better care and improved outcomes for those affected by MMA.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Sander, Howard W and Sudhansu Chokroverty. "Diabetic amyotrophy: Current concepts." Semin Neurol 16 (1996) 173-178.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Vibha, Deepti, Madhuri Behari, Vinay Goyal and Garima Shukla, et al. "Clinical profile of Monomelic Amyotrophy (MMA) and role of persistent viral infection." J Neurol Sci 359 (2015): 4-7.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Sun, Yu, Chien-Jung Lu, Rong-Chi Chen and Wen-Hsuan Hou, et al. "Risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in patients with diabetes: A nationwide population-based cohort study." J Epidemiol 25 (2015): 445-451.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Locke, Simeon, Donald G. Lawrence and Merle A. Legg. "Diabetic amyotrophy." Am J Med 34 (1963): 775-785.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Vinik, Aaron I., Elsa S. Strotmeyer, Abhijeet A. Nakave and Chhaya V. Patel. "Diabetic neuropathy in older adults." Clin Geriatr Med 24 (2008): 407-435.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  11. Barohn, Richard J., Zarife Sahenk, John R. Warmolts and Jerry R. Mendell. "The Bruns-Garland syndrome (diabetic amyotrophy): Revisited 100 years later." Arch Neurol 48 (1991): 1130-1135.
  12. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

arrow_upward arrow_upward