Commentary - (2022) Volume 13, Issue 12
Received: 02-Dec-2022, Manuscript No. Jbmbs-23-88617;
Editor assigned: 05-Dec-2022, Pre QC No. P-88617;
Reviewed: 16-Dec-2022, QC No. Q-88617;
Revised: 21-Dec-2022, Manuscript No. R-88617;
Published:
28-Dec-2022
, DOI: 10.37421/-2155-6180.2022.13.142
Citation: Sinnie, Buffey. “Characterize Global Efforts towards Universal Health Coverage.’’ J Biom Biosta 13 (2022): 142
Copyright: © 2022 Sinnie B. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
An estimated 17.9 million people per year die from cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), the leading cause of death. Coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, rheumatic heart disease, and other conditions make up the group of heart and blood vessel disorders known as CVDs. One-third of CVD deaths occur before the age of 70, and heart attacks and strokes account for more than four out of every five deaths. The main behavioural risk factors for heart disease and stroke are poor diet, inactivity, smoking, and excessive alcohol consumption. As a result of behavioural risk factors, people may experience symptoms like high blood pressure, high blood glucose, high blood lipids, and being overweight or obese. Primary care settings can assess these intermediate risk factors, which indicate an increased risk of heart attack, stroke, heart failure, and other outcomes.
Following the most recent advances in artificial intelligence utilizing VisV to evaluate fam creature biometrics, this paper proposed progressed demonstrating procedures in view of ML involving biometrics as contributions to target complex information like SCC, creature weight, rumination, and feed consumption (Model 1) and utilizing highlight extraction (utilizing profound learning) from creature faces as contributions to target cow age as an objective utilizing grouping ML displaying techniques. This paper's findings may make it easier to automate RDF for evaluating milk productivity, quality, animal welfare, and the early detection of diseases like mastitis. The robotic dairy facilities at Dookie C ollege served as the setting for the study. All protocols were approved by The University of Melbourne's Animal Ethics Committee. There are three Lely Astronaut milking machines in the robotic facilities, each of which can milk up to 180 cows per day. Cows are identified and their information, activity, and production data are recorded by wearing a transponder neck collar.Cows that voluntarily approached the facilities for milking were directed to the crush for video recording either before or after milking to avoid bias and stress caused by the milking effect. Data were collected on July 14–15 and August 4–5, 2021, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. Using a FLIR DUO PRO, which can simultaneously capture infrared thermal videos (IRTV) and visible red, green, and blue (RGB) videos, each cow was recorded for one minute each day.
A comprehensive review of these technologies for farm animals like cattle, pigs, sheep, and dairy cows was recently published by our research group. In particular, fruitful uses of computerized devices to evaluate creature biometrics have been made to survey the early identification of respiratory illnesses in pigs and biometrics for sheep, dairy cows, and steers . With these advancements, direct contact sensors can produce monitoring parameters like heart rate (HR), respiration rate (RR), and skin/eye temperature readings automatically and more effectively without putting animals under additional stress. However, for welfare evaluation or illness detection based on more invasive tools like handling animals and blood work, they still rely on the interpretation of professional veterinarians. Somatic cell count (SCC), animal weight, ruminance, and feed intake are some important well-being parameters to keep an eye on in the dairy cows analyzed in this paper.The SCC is a mastitis-related infection of the udder and a sign of milk quality. In contrast, rumination is the process of regurgitating feed, followed by mastication to break down the particles so they can be swallowed and pass through the reticulo-omasal orifice; however, animal weight is an important indicator of health, welfare, and milk production. This makes it possible to improve the digestion of fiber. Feed intake is the amount of feed the cow consumed from the robotic milker's total supply in this study. This could be influenced by a number of things, like stress; As a result, the robot can measure it and change it.In the past, machine learning (ML) models aimed at indirect milk production and quality traits were developed using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques based on automated computer vision algorithms for animal recognition and feature extraction.
Following the most recent advances in artificial intelligence utilizing VisV to evaluate fam creature biometrics, this paper proposed progressed demonstrating procedures in view of ML involving biometrics as contributions to target complex information like SCC, creature weight, rumination, and feed consumption (Model 1) and utilizing highlight extraction (utilizing profound learning) from creature faces as contributions to target cow age as an objective utilizing grouping ML displaying techniques.This paper's findings may make it easier to automate RDF for evaluating milk productivity, quality, animal welfare, and the early detection of diseases like mastitis [1-5].
We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticisms of the manuscript. The support from ROMA (Research Optimization and recovery in the Manufacturing industry), of the Research Council of Norway is highly appreciated by the authors.
The Author declares there is no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript.
Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at
Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at
Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at
Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at
Journal of Biometrics & Biostatistics received 3496 citations as per Google Scholar report