Comparative Study of the Muscles of Mastication in Anthropoid Primates

Elizabeth Steell^*
*Correspondence: Elizabeth Steell, Department of Anatomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK, Email:

Keywords

Anthropoid primates • Muscles of mastication • Locomotion

Introduction

The muscles of mastication are responsible for chewing and biting in animals. In anthropoid primates, which include monkeys, apes, and humans, the muscles of mastication have evolved to accommodate different dietary habits and feeding strategies. A comparative study of the muscles of mastication in anthropoid primate can provide insight into the functional adaptations of these muscles and their relationship to feeding behavior.

In general, the muscles of mastication in anthropoid primates are divided into four main groups: the temporalis, masseter, medial pterygoid, and lateral pterygoid muscles. The temporalis muscle is the largest of the four and is responsible for elevating the mandible [1]. The masseter muscle is the strongest of the four and is responsible for closing the jaw. The medial pterygoid muscle works in conjunction with the masseter muscle to produce a powerful bite force, while the lateral pterygoid muscle is responsible for opening the jaw.

Description

Several studies have shown that there are differences in the size and shape of the muscles of mastication among different species of anthropoid primates. For example, compared to other primates, humans have relatively smaller temporalis and masseter muscles, which may be related to our use of tools and cooking to process food, leading to less reliance on powerful biting and chewing forces. In contrast, some monkeys and apes have larger and more robust muscles of mastication, which may be related to their feeding habits, such as a diet of hard and tough plant materials. Other studies have suggested that differences in the shape and orientation of the muscles of mastication may also be related to the position of the mandible in the skull and the shape of the skull itself.

Overall, a comparative study of the muscles of mastication in anthropoid primate provides insights into the functional adaptations of these muscles and their relationship to feeding behavior, as well as the evolution of cranial morphology in primates [2]. The muscles of mastication in anthropoid primates, which include monkeys, apes, and humans, are a group of muscles responsible for the movements of the jaw during chewing and biting. These muscles are important for the processing of food and play a significant role in the functional adaptations of these primates.

In humans, the muscles of mastication are relatively smaller compared to other primates, which is thought to be related to our use of tools and cooking to process food. Additionally, the orientation of the muscles in humans is different, with the temporalis muscle attaching to the coronoid process of the mandible, rather than the zygomatic arch as in other primates. The evolution of muscles in primates has been shaped by their diverse ecological and behavioral adaptations, including their dietary habits, locomotion, and social behavior [3]. The significance of these adaptations can be seen in the anatomical changes that have occurred over time, as well as the functional consequences of these changes.

One significant adaptation in primate muscle evolution is related to the development of a large brain. Primates have larger brains relative to their body size compared to other mammals, and this has been associated with the evolution of more precise and complex motor control, including the development of fine motor skills, such as grasping and manipulating objects [4]. The muscles that control these movements, including those in the hands and arms, have become more specialized and adapted to these tasks, leading to greater dexterity and precision in primates.

Dietary adaptations have also played a significant role in the evolution of muscles in primates. The variation in diet among primates has resulted in the evolution of specialized muscles for chewing and digesting different types of food. For example, primates that consume tough, fibrous plant material, such as leaves and stems, have larger and more robust muscles of mastication to help process this material, while primates that consume fruit and insects have smaller, less robust muscles of mastication [5]. Locomotor adaptations have also influenced the evolution of muscles in primates. For example, primates that engage in quadrupedal locomotion, such as monkeys and apes, have evolved more complex and specialized muscles to support their posture and movement. In contrast, primates that have evolved to walk upright, such as humans, have evolved a unique set of muscles to support this mode of locomotion, including the gluteal muscles, which are important for maintaining balance and stability.

Conclusion

Finally, social behavior has also played a role in the evolution of muscles in primates. Social primates, such as baboons and macaques, have larger and more complex facial muscles that are involved in communicating social signals, such as expressions of dominance and submission.

In conclusion, the evolution of muscles in primates has been shaped by a variety of ecological and behavioral adaptations. These adaptations have resulted in anatomical changes that reflect the functional significance of these muscles, including the development of greater dexterity, specialized muscles for chewing and digesting food, and muscles specialized for different modes of locomotion and social behavior. The muscles of mastication in anthropoid primates have evolved unique adaptations to accommodate their diverse feeding habits. Understanding these adaptations can provide insights into the functional and evolutionary significance of these muscles in primates.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Dickinson, Edwin, Francisco Pastor, Sharlene E. Santana and Adam Hartstone‐Rose. "Functional and ecological correlates of the primate jaw abductors." Anat Rec 305 (2022): 1245-1263.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Terhune, Claire E., D. Rex Mitchell, Siobhán B. Cooke and Claire A. Kirchhoff, et al. "Temporomandibular joint shape in anthropoid primates varies widely and is patterned by size and phylogeny." Anat Rec 305 (2022): 2227-2248.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Kristjanson, Heather Lynn. "Tupaiid Masticatory Anatomy and the Application of Extant Analogs to Reconstructing Plesiadapiform Jaw Adductors." Johns Hopkins Uni (2019).

Google Scholar, Indexed at

4. Ravosa, Matthew J and Christopher J. Vinyard. "Masticatory loading and ossification of the mandibular symphysis during anthropoid origins." Sci Rep 10 (2020): 5950.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Cerrito, Paola and Alex R. DeCasien. "The expression of care: Alloparental care frequency predicts neural control of facial muscles in primates." Evol 75 (2021): 1727-1737.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at