Comprehensive Review of the Therapeutic Potential of Ayush−64 against Covid−19

Shyam Babu Singh^1*, Poornima Mansoria² and Savita Sharma^1
*Correspondence: Shyam Babu Singh, Department of Ayurveda, Regional Ayurveda Research Institute, C.C.R.A.S, Gwalior, India, Tel: +91-9782560296, Email: ,

Keywords

Ayurveda • COVID-19 • AYUSH-64

Introduction

The late-2019 outbreak of corona virus disease (now known as COVID-19) in Wuhan, China triggered a global public health emergency that now affects more than 200 countries worldwide. Coronavirus is a positive-sense ribonucleic acid (RNA) with crown-like spikes from the Coronaviridae family. Over the last two decades, pandemics caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) resulted in 10% and 37% mortality rates, respectively [1]. A new coronavirus of probable bat origin caused an outbreak of human pulmonary disease in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, which quickly spread throughout the world [2]. The world health organisation initially referred to the causative agent as 2019-novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) (WHO). According to the International Committee of Corona virus Study Group (ICCSG), the virus named Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) shares 82.30% of its RNA genome and pathogenesis (host) with SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV) [1,3]. The disease was finally termed corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (WHO, 2020). On January 30, 2020, WHO officially declared the COVID-19 epidemic a public health emergency of international concern and the outbreak was confirmed as a pandemic on March 11, 2020. (WHO, 2020). SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 share a similar pathogenesis (host) due to genome similarities. The Government of India's Ministry of AYUSH (MoA) has undertaken a number of R&D and public health projects to examine how AYUSH systems might be used to lessen the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. To conduct research on COVID-19 using various AYUSH systems, numerous institutions under the Ministry of AYUSH have partnered with renowned medical and scientific companies around the nation. In order to handle different aspects of clinical and experimental research through AYUSH interventions, the MoA established an inter-disciplinary AYUSH R&D Task Force made up of scientists, pulmonologists, epidemiologists, pharmacologists, etc. from prestigious organisations and research institutions. A series of self-care recommendations for preventive health measures was also suggested by the Ministry of AYUSH, with a focus on respiratory health and boosting overall immunity. To enable uniform clinical management, the Ministry of AYUSH further released the National Clinical Management Protocol based on Ayurveda & Yoga for management of COVID-19 [4]. The protocol's recommended management practises are based on intermediate trends and findings from the AYUSH COVID-19 investigations as well as published data on the security and possible advantages of Ayush interventions.

Results and Discussion

About Ayush-64

The Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, India's apex organisation for Ayurvedic research and development under the Ministry of AYUSH, Government of India, developed AYUSH-64, a poly-herbal compound. Saptaparna (Alstonia scholaris R. Br.) bark aqueous extract 100 mg, Katuki (Picrorhiza kurroa Royle ex. Benth) root extract 100 mg, Kiratatikta (Swertia Chirata Pexbex. Karst) whole-plant extract 100 mg and Kuberaksha (Caesalpinia crista L.) seed powder 200 mg are the four ingredients [5]. All four AYUSH-64 components have a bitter flavour, making them amapachak (able to digest the bitterness). Ama or food that has not been digested) and hence they behave like Jvaraghna (antipyretic). The combined effects of these herbs include jwarahara (which can relieve fever), sannipata jwarahara (which can relieve intermittent fevers), krimihara (which is wormicidal), jantuhara (which is anthelmintic/antimicrobial/antiviral) and shothahara (which is anti-inflammatory). This compound is effective against conditions like influenza-like illnesses, which have the symptoms of cough, cold, headache and fever. According to reports, a number of the drug's constituents have pharmacological properties that include antimalarial, antiviral, antiinflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. Studies suggests that Ayush-64 is a safe and non-toxic formulation in a dose of 500 mg/kg body weight for 12 weeks in experimental studies [6,7] At the department of Molecular Virology Laboratory, possible antiviral efficacy of Chirakin (marketed as AYUSH-64 by Zandu) against the Chikungunya virus was examined. In order to assess the effectiveness of the chemical in terms of activity index and selectivity index in a protection experiment, Vero cells were infected with the Chikungunya Virus (CHIKV) and treated with an optimal concentration of Chirakin (25 mg/mL) at the Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology in Thiruvananthapuram, testing for plaque prevention and reduction. Plaque test in Vero cells was used to measure the reduction in viral yield in cells treated with chirakin. In this study, chirakin has antiviral action against the chikungunya virus. In protection testing, it was found to be more active than ribavirin, although both drugs perform almost equally well in plaque reduction assays (CK Katiyar. Technical note on Chirakin Tab e Unpublished report) (Table 1).

Based on the previous effectiveness on infective febrile conditions such as malaria, microfilaraemia, chikungunya and influenza with no safety issues observed in published clinical studies [8-12] further AYUSH-64 was repurposed for COVID-19 based on a previous clinical study that showed AYUSH-64 was effective in Influenza like Illness (ILI) and a molecular docking study that revealed 35 phytoconstituents isolated from AYUSH-64 demonstrated antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 [13]. During Covid-19, clinical studies have been conducted to explore the therapeutic efficacy of traditional medicines in COVID-19 across the world. In India, traditional medical practices like Ayurveda have been extremely crucial in the prevention and management of COVID-19. Out of 122 trials on COVID-19 recorded in the clinical trial registry of India as of June 2020, the majority (n=67) were registered in the category of traditional medicine as compared to conventional medicine (n=42) [14]. So far total 11 studies were found in which AYUSH-64 was explored to manage Covid-19 conditions as stand-alone or adjunct to standard care treatment. For these clinical trials, the major outcomes included SARS-CoV-2 clearance determined by a negative RT-PCR assay, efficacy proved in terms of clinical recovery, mean time to clinical recovery and mean time to clinical recovery. Secondary outcomes include clinical worsening (progression to severe or critical stage), incidence of death, change in pro-inflammatory marker levels, chest imaging findings and quality of life parameters. Adverse event/adverse drug reaction incidence and changes in hematologic and biochemical markers were the safety outcomes.

Study outcomes

In one study (HR Natraz, et al) AYUSH-64 was administered to the mild to moderate Covid-19 patients in a dose of 500 mg twice daily after food as adjuvant along with standard of care (SOC) as compared to SOC alone, It was found effective and safe in reducing the cardinal symptoms of Covid-19 viz fever, cough, sore throat, diarrhoea, headache, loss of taste, skin rashes and tiredness [15]. In a single arm pilot study AYUSH-64 was administered in a dose of 500 mg thrice in a day for 7 to 14 days. It was observed that 39.28% of participants experienced a clinical recovery in 7 days; and 53.5% of patients experienced a clinical recovery in 14 days. The mean time for clinical recovery was 7.04 days (±2.88 days standard deviation) [16] Similarly in one more study AYUSH-64 was found effective in terms of clinical recovery, where 86.1% of patients demonstrated clinical recovery following a 14-day intervention with Ayush-64, of which 75% did so within 7 days. According to the results of the RT-PCR test, 50% of participants went negative on day 8 and 69.4% of individuals became negative up to day 15 [17]. Three Randomized controlled Trials (RCTs) revealed the percentage of patients who achieved clinical recovery [18-20]. Overall, patients receiving AYUSH-64 in addition to standard therapy (AG) showed improved clinical recovery compared to the control group receiving standard care alone (CG) (n=386; OR= 2.35; 95% CI= 1.33 to 4.16; P=0.003) Additionally, COVID-19 patients in AG showed a higher percentage of clinical recovery within 7 days. Although there was a decreased percentage of asymptomatic participants moving into the symptomatic stage in the AG group in one RCT that demonstrated clinical improvement as measured by the WHO ordinal scale, the mean score did not differ significantly across groups [17]. Three studies reported the percentage of subjects who tested COVID-19- negative by RT-PCR [18-21]. The period of time from day 7 till clinical recovery was used to evaluate the SARS-COV-2 clearance using an RT-PCR test. Within 14 days, the AG showed improved SARS-COV-2 clearance.

The changes in the levels of serum pro-inflammatory biomarkers, including C-reactive protein (CRP), Ddimer, serum ferritin, interleukin-6, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and TNF-[18,19] The levels of pro-inflammatory biomarkers were not significantly different between groups, while significant declines in the levels of the majority of the biomarkers were recorded within groups. According to one study, the effect size of these parameters was larger in the AG compared to CG for D-dimer (0.490 v/s 0.431), serum ferritin (0.651 v/s 0.565) and CRP level (0.558 v/s 0.465) [18]. Two studies demonstrated an improvement in the chest imaging findings [18,19]. According to one study, there was a significant difference between the AG (p-value = 0.031) and CG (p-value = 0.210) in the HRCT chest CO-RADS score. 12 Additionally, more AG participants had lower CO-RADS category 1 scores on day 30 compared to CG participants (p-value = 0.017). Another survey suggests no post-COVID lung problems at the end of the study period and that the results of the chest skiagram were equivalent in both groups [20]. According to two studies, none of the subjects required oxygen therapy or experienced any side effects including pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, arrhythmia, etc. in AG group [18,19]. One of the studies that were included revealed changes in quality-of-life metrics [20]. The WHOQOL-BREF scale was used in the study to evaluate overall life quality. Comparing the AG to the CG, there was a clear improvement in the physical health, psychological health, social relationships and environmental well-being. At the conclusion of the study period, one study showed Perceived Stress Scale values that were comparable in both groups [19].

In another study carried out in India from May 8 to August 31, 2021 to investigate the disease characteristics, care-seeking behaviour during home isolation, clinical outcomes, adverse events and the relationship between various risk factors and clinical recovery over the course of the study period, a cross-sectional analysis of the data generated by a community study Semi-structured questionnaires were used to gather the data and they were available in an electronic data collection format at the beginning, 7, 14 and 21 days afterwards. To investigate the link between pertinent factors and clinical recovery, a logistic regression analysis was conducted. Baseline analysis was performed on data from 64,642 individuals, while final analysis was performed on data from 49,770 people. The recruited participants' average age was 38.8 11.7 years and 8.4% of them had co-morbidities. 58.3% of participants added AYUSH-64 to their regular medical treatment. Regarding clinical improvement, disease progression, the need for oxygen supplementation, hospitalisation, admission to the intensive care unit and the requirement for ventilator support, participants using AYUSH-64 either as a stand-alone treatment or as an addition to standard care experienced comparable clinical outcomes. Early clinical recovery was associated with younger age, no co-morbidities, no substance misuse and vaccination compared to older age and non-vaccination [22].

Possible mechanism

The majority of COVID-19 patients exhibit lymphocytopenia, an elevated interleukin concentration, a subnormal or decreased leukocyte count and tumour necrosis factor-a. Bronchial epithelial cells produce IL-6 in a dosedependent manner in response to SARS-CoV infection. TLR-7 (Tell Like Receptor-7) allows the SARS-CoV-2 virus to infiltrate through ACE2 by activating pro-inflammatory kinases. AYUSH-64 has an acidic pH and is high in phytoacids. Similar to other anti-malarial medications, AYUSH-64's antiviral actions may be attained by raising the pH of intracellular vacuoles and reducing endosomal activity [23,24].

The central metabolism is deregulated in the early immunological response to COVID-19 in order to mobilise energy, cells and biomolecules [24- 27]. Amadosha (undigested by products of digestion and metabolism) is the Ayurvedic term for this dysregulation of the central metabolism. The Deepana and Pachana qualities of Saptaparna and Katuki (which improve digestion and metabolism) cleanse the Amadosha. In order to produce an antiviral defence response, AYUSH-64 may be reprogramming the host metabolism and controlling enzyme activity and biosynthesis. Additionally, S. chirata Pexbex’s anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties enhance its effects [28]. The haemocytic system is activated during the inflammatory phase of COVID-19 by a number of factors, leading to endothelial dysfunction, platelet activation, as well as micro and macrovascular thrombosis. ACE2 and TMPRSS2 receptors are used by human platelets to express. By attaching to these receptors, SARS-CoV-2 and its Spike protein directly promote platelet activation [29]. The thrombolytic effect of P. kurroa Royle ex. Benth in AYUSH-64 is in accordance with Ayurvedic theory. Another perspective is that D-dimer in critical patients of COVID-19 is elevated and AYUSH-64 decreases the levels of D-dimer significantly.

Conclusion

The components of AYUSH-64 may block the Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme II (ACE2) and Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), reduce COVID- 19's initial symptoms and the cytokine storm and stop the disease from progressing. In multiple clinical trials, AYUSH-64 has been repurposed for the management of asymptomatic and mild to moderate cases of COVID-19 as a stand-alone therapy or as an addition to normal care, with encouraging outcomes. On the basis of clinical trials conducted it was found that AYUSH-64 used in conjunction with standard care, AYUSH-64 expedites clinical recovery compared to standard care alone, prevents disease progression and has been demonstrated to be safe in patients with asymptomatic, mild and moderate COVID-19.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest.

References

1. Rabi, Firas A., Mazhar S. Al Zoubi, Ghena A. Kasasbeh and Dunia M. Salameh, et al. "SARS-CoV-2 and coronavirus disease 2019: What we know so far." Pathogens 9 (2020): 231.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Wu, F., S. Zhao, B. Yu and Y. M. Chen, et al. "A novel coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China." Nature 579 (2020): 265-269.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Lu, Roujian, Xiang Zhao, Juan Li and Peihua Niu, et al. "Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: Implications for virus origins and receptor binding." Lancet 395 (2020): 565-574.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. https://www.ayush.gov.in/docs/ayush-Protocol-covid-19.pdf
5. CCRAS. Ayush-64 A new ayurvedic anti-malarial compound. 1st ed. New Delhi: Central Council for Research in Ayurveda and Siddha (1987).
6. Ayush-64 A new ayurvedic anti- malarial compound. Central Council for Research in Ayurveda and Siddha, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Govt. of India (1987).
7. Anonymous. Pharmacological investigations of certain medicinal plants and compound formulations used in Ayurveda and siddha. Central Council for Research in Ayurveda and Siddha, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Govt. of India (1996).
8. Gundeti, Manohar S., Laxman W. Bhurke, Pallavi S. Mundada and Sanjay Murudkar, et al. "AYUSH 64, a polyherbal ayurvedic formulation in Influenza-like illness-results of a pilot study." J Ayurveda Integr Med 13 (2022): 100325.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

9. Chari, M.V., S. Venkataraghavan, C. Seshadri and B. Ramakrishna Shetty, et al. "A double blind clinical trial with ayush-64 an ayurvedic drug in P. vivax malaria." J Res Ay Sid 6 (1982): 105-116.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

10. Bhatia, D. "Role of AYUSH-64 in malaria epidemic." J Res Ay Sid 18 (1997): 71-76.
11. Pandey, P.N. and Prem Kishore. "Effect of Ayush-64 and saptaparnaghanavati on microfilaraemia." J Res Ay Sid 12 (1989): 145-150.
12. Management of chikungunya through Ayurveda and Siddha–a technical report. Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, Department of Ayush, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India (2009).
13. Ram, Thrigulla Saketh, Manne Munikumar, Vankudavath Naik Raju and Parasannanavar Devaraj, et al. "In silico evaluation of the compounds of the ayurvedic drug, AYUSH-64, for the action against the SARS-CoV-2 main protease." J Ayurveda Integr Med 13 (2022): 100413.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

14. Rao, M. Vishnu Vardhana, Atul Juneja, Mohua Maulik and Tulsi Adhikari, et al. "Emerging trends from COVID-19 research registered in the clinical trials Registry-India." Indian J Med Res 153 (2021): 26.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

15. Nataraj, H.R. "Safety and efficacy of Ayush 64 tablets as an adjunct therapy and its effect on bio-markers in mild to moderate covid-19 patients." J Ayurvedic Herb Med 7 (2021): 251-256.
16. Shamkuwar, Manoj K., Shivshankar Rajput, Babita Yadav and Sujata Ranjan, et al. "Ayurveda formulation AYUSH 64 in asymptomatic and mild COVID-19 infection-A single-arm, open-label, prospective, pilot study." J Res Ayurvedic Sci 6 (2022): 53.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

17. Singh, N.R., Amit Madan, Babita Yadav and Arun Gupta, et al. "Effect of an Ayurvedic intervention (Ayush-64) in mild to moderate COVID-19: An exploratory prospective single arm clinical trial." (2021).

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

18. Singh, Harbans, Sumit Srivastava, Babita Yadav and Amit K. Rai, et al. "AYUSH-64 as an adjunct to standard care in mild to moderate COVID-19: An open-label randomized controlled trial in Chandigarh, India." Complement Ther Med 66 (2022): 102814.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

19. Reddy, R. Govind, Rajesh Vithal Gosavi, Babita Yadav and Amit Kumar Rai, et al. "AYUSH-64 as an add-on to standard care in asymptomatic and mild cases of COVID-19: A randomized controlled trial." Ayu 41 (2020): 107.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

20. Kilarski, Witold W., Małgorzata Wachowska, Angelika Muchowicz and Renata Mezyk-Kopec, et al. "Anti-clotting functions of lymphatics form the natural on-off switch for immune recognition by controlling the antigens and immune cells access to the lymph nodes." BioRxiv (2021): 2021-06.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

21. Bhardwaj, Pankaj, Pawan Kumar Godatwar, Jaykaran Charan and Sanjeev Sharma, et al. "Efficacy and safety of ayurveda intervention (AYUSH 64) as add-on therapy for patients with COVID-19 infections–an open labelled, parallel group, randomized controlled clinical trial." MedRxiv (2021): 2021-08.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

22. Srikanth, Narayanam, Adarsh Kumar, Bhogavalli Chandrasekhararao and Richa Singhal, et al. "Disease characteristics, care-seeking behavior and outcomes associated with the use of AYUSH-64 in COVID-19 patients in home isolation in India: A community-based cross-sectional analysis." Front Public Health 10 (2022).

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

23. Vimal, K. Maurya, Swatantra Kumar, Madan L.B Bhatt and Shailendra K. Saxena, et al. “Antiviral activity of traditional medicinal plants from Ayurveda against SARS-CoV-2 infection.” J Biomol Struct Dyn 40 (2020): 1719-1735.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

24. Thakar, Anup, Kalpesh Panara, Falgun Patel and Shital Bhagiya, et al. "Add-on Ayurveda Treatment for early stage COVID-19: A single centre retrospective cohort study from Gujarat, India." (2021).

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

25. Cheng, Shih-Chin, Leo AB Joosten and Mihai G. Netea. "The interplay between central metabolism and innate immune responses." Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 25 (2014): 707-713.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

26. Hashimoto, Tatsuo, Thomas Perlot, Ateequr Rehman and Jean Trichereau, et al. "ACE2 links amino acid malnutrition to microbial ecology and intestinal inflammation." Nature 487 (2012): 477-481.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

27. Singh, N., B. Suthar, A. Mehta and N. Nema, et al. "Corona virus: An immunological perspective review." Int J Immunol Immunother 7 (2020): 050.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

28. Das, Sreedam Chandra, Subrata Bhadra, Sumon Roy and Sajal Kumar Saha, et al. "Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities of ethanolic root extract of Swertia chirata (Gentianaceae)." Jordan J Biol Sci 5 (2012): 31-36.
29. Zhang, Si, Yangyang Liu, Xiaofang Wang and Li Yang, et al. "SARS-CoV-2 binds platelet ACE2 to enhance thrombosis in COVID-19." J Hematol Oncol 13 (2020): 1-22.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at