GET THE APP

Cryptography and Artificial Intelligence: Synergies and Security Challenges
..

Journal of Computer Science & Systems Biology

ISSN: 0974-7230

Open Access

Perspective - (2024) Volume 17, Issue 4

Cryptography and Artificial Intelligence: Synergies and Security Challenges

Jack Leo*
*Correspondence: Jack Leo, Department of Mathematics and Physics, Universidad Nebrija, C/Santa Cruz de Marcenado 27, 28015 Madrid, Spain, Email:
Department of Mathematics and Physics, Universidad Nebrija, C/Santa Cruz de Marcenado 27, 28015 Madrid, Spain

Received: 01-Jul-2024, Manuscript No. jcsb-24-145431; Editor assigned: 03-Jul-2024, Pre QC No. P-145431; Reviewed: 17-Jul-2024, QC No. Q-145431; Revised: 22-Jul-2024, Manuscript No. R-145431; Published: 29-Jul-2024 , DOI: 10.37421/0974-7230.2024.17.535
Citation: Leo, Jack. “Cryptography and Artificial Intelligence: Synergies and Security Challenges.” J Comput Sci Syst Biol 17 (2024): 535.
Copyright: © 2024 Leo J. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution license which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) and cryptography evolve, their intersection presents both promising opportunities and complex security challenges. This article explores the synergies between AI and cryptography, examining how AI can enhance cryptographic practices and the security challenges that arise from integrating these technologies. We will analyze current advancements, practical applications and the implications for future developments in secure communications and data protection. Cryptography, the practice of secure communication in the presence of adversaries and AI, which involves the simulation of human intelligence in machines, are both critical fields in modern technology. The integration of AI into cryptographic systems can potentially enhance security measures and streamline encryption processes. However, this integration also introduces new vulnerabilities and challenges that need to be addressed [1].

Description

AI has the potential to significantly improve cryptographic methods through various means: AI can be used to optimize cryptographic algorithms, making them more efficient. For instance, machine learning algorithms can analyze vast amounts of data to identify patterns and optimize key management processes. Machine learning models can be trained to detect anomalies or potential vulnerabilities in cryptographic systems, improving their robustness against attacks. AI can enhance key generation processes by creating more unpredictable and robust keys through advanced algorithms that simulate complex random processes. AI systems can automate attacks on cryptographic systems, such as brute-force attacks or side-channel attacks, by leveraging computational power and pattern recognition. AI can be used to develop adversarial machine learning techniques that exploit weaknesses in cryptographic algorithms, posing new challenges for cryptographic security [2,3].

Adversaries may use AI to infer sensitive information from cryptographic models or their outputs, potentially compromising the confidentiality of encrypted data. AI systems trained on compromised or manipulated data can introduce weaknesses into cryptographic algorithms, making them more susceptible to attacks. Many AI algorithms operate as "black boxes," where the internal workings are not transparent. This lack of transparency can hinder the ability to audit and validate cryptographic systems, increasing the risk of hidden vulnerabilities. The complexity of AI models can make it difficult to explain their behavior, which is crucial for ensuring the security and reliability of cryptographic systems. AI-enhanced cryptographic systems may be used for surveillance purposes, raising questions about privacy and civil liberties [4,5].

AI algorithms can introduce biases that may affect the security and fairness of cryptographic systems. Ensuring that AI models are fair and unbiased is essential for maintaining trust in cryptographic technologies. Quantum cryptography, which leverages the principles of quantum mechanics to secure communications, benefits from AI in various ways: AI can optimize the performance of QKD systems, improving the efficiency of key distribution and enhancing security. AI can be used to study and develop quantum cryptanalysis techniques, helping to advance our understanding of quantum cryptography and its potential vulnerabilities. AI can enhance the security and functionality of smart contracts by automating contract execution and detecting potential vulnerabilities. AI algorithms can be used to identify and prevent fraudulent activities within blockchain networks, improving overall security.

Conclusion

Developing new cryptographic protocols that leverage AI for enhanced security and efficiency. Creating cryptographic systems that are specifically designed to resist AI-driven attacks and vulnerabilities. Establishing guidelines and regulations to address the ethical and privacy concerns associated with AI in cryptography. The intersection of cryptography and AI presents both exciting opportunities and significant challenges. While AI can enhance cryptographic techniques and improve security, it also introduces new vulnerabilities and ethical considerations. As these technologies continue to evolve, it is crucial to address the associated risks and develop robust solutions to ensure the to address the associated risks and develop robust solutions to ensure the continued security and integrity of cryptographic systems.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Moncayo-Matute, Freddy P., Efrén Vázquez-Silva, Pablo G. Peña-Tapia and Paúl B. Torres-Jara, et al. "Finite Element Analysis of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Cranial Implant Manufactured with PMMA and PEEK: A Mechanical Comparative Study." Polymers 15 (2023): 3620.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  2. Chen, Xiaojun, Lu Xu, Xing Li and Jan Egger, et al. "Computer-aided implant design for the restoration of cranial defects." Sci Rep 7 (2017): 4199.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Li, Jianning, Gord Von Campe, Antonio Pepe and Christina Gsaxner, et al. "Automatic skull defect restoration and cranial implant generation for cranioplasty." Med Image Anal 73 (2021): 102171.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  4. Haque, Fariha, Anthony F. Luscher, Kerry-Ann S. Mitchell and Alok Sutradhar, et al. "Optimization of fixations for additively manufactured cranial implants: Insights from finite element analysis." Biomimetics 8 (2023): 498.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. El Halabi, F., J. F. Rodriguez, L. Rebolledo, E. Hurtós, and M. Doblaré. "Mechanical characterization and numerical simulation of Polyether–Ether–Ketone (PEEK) cranial implants." J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 4 (2011): 1819-1832.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 2279

Journal of Computer Science & Systems Biology received 2279 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Computer Science & Systems Biology peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward