GET THE APP

Cutting-edge DNA-Biomacromolecule Sensor: Boosting Sensitivity in Clinical Cancer Sample Detection
..

Journal of Cancer Clinical Trials

ISSN: 2577-0535

Open Access

Mini Review - (2024) Volume 9, Issue 2

Cutting-edge DNA-Biomacromolecule Sensor: Boosting Sensitivity in Clinical Cancer Sample Detection

Steven Anderson*
*Correspondence: Steven Anderson, Department of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia, Email:
Department of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia

Received: 01-Apr-2024, Manuscript No. Jcct-24-136713; Editor assigned: 03-Apr-2024, Pre QC No. P-136713; Reviewed: 15-Apr-2024, QC No. Q-136713; Revised: 20-Apr-2024, Manuscript No. R-136713; Published: 27-Apr-2024 , DOI: 10.37421/2577-0535.2024.9.239
Citation: Anderson, Steven. “Cutting-edge DNA Biomacromolecule Sensor: Boosting Sensitivity in Clinical Cancer Sample Detection.” J Cancer Clin Trials 9 (2024): 239.
Copyright: © 2024 Anderson S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

An ultrasensitive DNA-biomacromolecule system or technology can detect and analyze DNA molecules with exceptional precision. As the fundamental genetic material in living organisms, DNA is crucial for numerous biological processes and has extensive applications in diagnostics and research. These ultrasensitive technologies are designed to identify and quantify tiny amounts of DNA within a sample. Utilizing various detection methodologies such as fluorescence, electrochemical sensing, nanopore sequencing, or amplification techniques like polymerase chain reaction, these technologies allow scientists to achieve highly accurate and sensitive detection of DNA molecules, even at extremely low concentrations.

Keywords

DNA-biomacromolecule • Nanopore • Ultrasensitive DNA

Introduction

ltrasensitive DNA detection plays a pivotal role in molecular diagnostics, enabling the identification of diseases, genetic disorders, and infectious agents. By pinpointing specific DNA sequences linked to particular conditions, it supports early disease detection and personalized medicine initiatives. Furthermore, DNA analysis is fundamental in forensic investigations, aiding in suspect identification and establishing genetic relationships with exceptional accuracy. These ultrasensitive technologies excel in extracting and analyzing DNA from minimal biological samples, thereby enhancing the precision and reliability of forensic analyses. Additionally, DNA-based monitoring techniques are used to evaluate the presence and abundance of diverse organisms in environmental samples. These technologies empower the detection of rare or low-abundance species, enriching biodiversity studies and ecological research endeavours [1].

Literature Review

Detecting and analyzing DNA mutations or abnormalities associated with cancer is crucial for understanding the disease's molecular mechanisms and developing targeted therapies. Ultrasensitive DNA technologies are vital in identifying rare mutations or circulating tumor DNA, facilitating early cancer diagnosis and monitoring treatment efficacy. DNA analysis is integral to drug development and clinical trials, enabling the quantification of drug target genes, assessment of treatment effectiveness, and monitoring for drug-resistant mutations. In disease detection, particularly cancer, the importance of diagnostic testing of biological macromolecules cannot be overstated. However, achieving sensitive detection of macromolecules through interface-based sensing methods is challenging due to their limited surface area and significant steric hindrance. Introducing the "biphasic replacement" electrochemical aptamer-based sensing technique, this method replaces the capture reaction of the biomacromolecule with a small diameter of single-stranded DNA attached to the interface. Demonstrating the ultrasensitive detection of luteinizing hormone with this BRE-AB sensor showcases its promising potential for sensitive molecular detection in clinical settings [2].

Discussion

The aptamer-target LH binding mechanism is investigated using Molecular Dynamics simulations. Additionally, the BRE-AB sensor has demonstrated superior sensing capabilities in both undiluted plasma and whole blood. It successfully quantified LH concentrations in 40 clinical samples, revealing that breast cancer patients have higher LH expression. The sensor's simplicity, low cost, and ease of regeneration and reuse highlight its potential for biological macromolecule diagnostics at the point of care. The BRE-AB system's signaling mechanism involves both solution and interface reactions. In the absence of a target, prehybridized aptamer/signal duplexes remain in the solution phase, with only a few free signal probes with the redox indicator methylene blue able to enter the interface. Meanwhile, the anchored helper probes on the interface maintain a steady state. Upon the addition of target biomacromolecules, more stable aptamer/target complexes form by specifically binding to the aptamer and releasing signal probes from the aptamer/signal duplexes. The helper probes, anchored to the surface of the gold electrode via Au-S chemistry, then hybridize with the released signal probes at the interface. Consequently, the MB indicators are brought close to the gold surface, significantly accelerating electron transfer [3-6].

Conclusion

This study introduces a Biphasic Replacement E-AB sensing platform for highly sensitive detection of biomacromolecules at the picomolar level. The sensor offers several notable advantages, including ultrahigh sensitivity, excellent regenerability, and reusability, all achieved through a straightforward and cost-effective fabrication process. Remarkably, the BRE-AB sensor maintains a low detection limit even in whole blood samples. Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulation findings suggest that electrostatic interaction, hydrogen bonding, and the alkyl hydrophobic effect are the predominant forces driving Luteinizing Hormone (LH) binding to the aptamer. The BRE-AB sensor holds significant promise for analyzing and detecting various target molecules, facilitated by well-designed probe sequences informed by theoretical simulations and free energy predictions. This study highlights the potential of the BRE-AB sensor for early cancer diagnosis, positioning it as a promising candidate for macromolecular detection applications.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  1. Covens, Al, Emily T. Vella, Erin B. Kennedy and Clare J. Reade, et al. "Sentinel lymph node biopsy in vulvar cancer: Systematic review, meta-analysis and guideline recommendations." Gynecol Oncol 137 (2015): 351-361.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Powless, Cecelia A., Giovanni D. Aletti, Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez and William A. Cliby. "Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in apparent early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: Implications for surgical staging." Gynecol Oncol 122 (2011): 536-540.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Brar, Savtaj S., Rajini Seevaratnam, Roberta Cardoso and Lavanya Yohanathan, et al. "Multivisceral resection for gastric cancer: A systematic review.Gastric Cancer 15 (2012): 100-107.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Lawrie, Theresa A., Amit Patel, Pierre PL Martin‐Hirsch and Andrew Bryant, et al. "Sentinel node assessment for diagnosis of groin lymph node involvement in vulval cancer." Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6 (2014).
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Crnčić, Tatjana Bogović, Maja Ilić Tomaš, Neva Girotto and Svjetlana Grbac Ivanković. "Risk factors for thyroid cancer: What do we know so far?." Acta Clinica Croatica 59 (2020): 66.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  11. Sung, Hyuna, Jacques Ferlay, Rebecca L. Siegel and Mathieu Laversanne, et al. "Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries." CA Cancer J Clin 71 (2021): 209-249.
  12. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 95

Journal of Cancer Clinical Trials received 95 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Cancer Clinical Trials peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward