Data Characteristics in Manufacturing Process Quality Monitoring: The Welding Example

Sanik Remalia^*
*Correspondence: Sanik Remalia, Department of Business Administration/Big Data Analytics, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea, Email:

Keywords

Structural integrity • Reliability • Welding

Introduction

In modern manufacturing, ensuring the quality of products is paramount for maintaining competitiveness and meeting customer expectations. Welding, as a critical process in various industries including automotive, aerospace and construction, requires stringent quality control measures to ensure structural integrity and performance reliability. Traditionally, quality monitoring in welding relied on manual inspection and periodic testing, which are time-consuming and may not capture subtle defects or variations. However, with advancements in sensing technologies and data analytics, manufacturers now have access to a wealth of data that can be utilized for real-time monitoring and optimization of welding processes [1,2].

Literature Review

Welding processes generate diverse types of data, each with its unique characteristics and significance for quality monitoring. One of the primary data sources in welding is sensor data, which includes parameters such as voltage, current, temperature and weld penetration depth. Sensor data provides real-time insights into the welding process dynamics, allowing for immediate adjustments to maintain quality standards. Additionally, image data captured by high-speed cameras or vision systems offers visual feedback on weld bead geometry, porosity, and defects. Integrating image analysis algorithms enables automated defect detection and classification, enhancing the efficiency of quality inspection.

Apart from real-time data, historical records of welding parameters and inspection results are valuable for trend analysis and root cause identification. By analyzing historical data, manufacturers can identify recurring issues, assess the impact of process changes, and implement corrective actions to prevent future defects. Furthermore, contextual data such as material specifications, environmental conditions, and operator credentials provide additional insights into process variability and performance attribution [3].

Discussion

Despite the potential benefits, leveraging data for welding quality monitoring presents several challenges. Data heterogeneity, arising from the diverse nature of sensor and image data, complicates integration and analysis efforts. Moreover, ensuring data accuracy and reliability is crucial, as erroneous or incomplete data can lead to misleading conclusions and decisions. Another challenge is the volume and velocity of data generated during high-speed welding processes, requiring efficient data storage and processing solutions.

However, these challenges also present opportunities for innovation and improvement. Advanced analytics techniques, including machine learning and artificial intelligence, offer capabilities for pattern recognition, anomaly detection, and predictive modeling. By training models on large datasets encompassing various welding conditions and outcomes, manufacturers can develop predictive maintenance strategies and optimize process parameters for enhanced quality and productivity. Furthermore, advancements in sensor technology, such as the integration of IoT sensors and edge computing, enable real-time data collection and analysis directly from the welding equipment, minimizing latency and improving responsiveness [4-6].

Conclusion

In conclusion, data characteristics play a crucial role in welding quality monitoring, offering valuable insights into process performance and product quality. By harnessing the diverse types of data generated during welding processes, manufacturers can implement effective monitoring strategies, minimize defects, and optimize production efficiency. However, realizing the full potential of data-driven quality monitoring requires addressing challenges related to data integration, accuracy, and scalability. Through continuous innovation and collaboration between domain experts and data scientists, manufacturers can leverage data analytics to drive improvements in welding process quality and achieve sustainable competitive advantage in the global market. Quality monitoring in welding processes involves complex data characteristics, ranging from sensor data and material properties to environmental conditions and process parameters. Effective monitoring requires robust data integration, real-time analysis, and advanced techniques like machine learning and AI. Addressing the challenges of data volume, quality, and integration will further enhance the reliability and efficiency of welding processes. The continuous evolution of sensing technologies and data analysis methods promises to significantly improve the quality and consistency of welded products, particularly in critical industries like automotive manufacturing.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Reimer, Andrew P. and Elizabeth A. Madigan. "Veracity in big data: How good is good enough." J Health Inform 25 (2019): 1290-1298.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Segreto, Tiziana and Roberto Teti. "Data quality evaluation for smart multi-sensor process monitoring using data fusion and machine learning algorithms." Prod Eng 17 (2023): 197-210.

Google Scholar, Crossref

3. UnnisaBegum, Ahmed, Mohammed Ashfaq Hussain and Mubeena Shaik. "Data mining techniques for big data." Int J Adv Res Sci Eng Technol 6 (2019): 4-8.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Seyedan, Mahya and Fereshteh Mafakheri. "Predictive big data analytics for supply chain demand forecasting: Methods, applications and research opportunities." J Big Data 7 (2020): 53.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Kamble, Sachin S. and Angappa Gunasekaran. "Big data-driven supply chain performance measurement system: A review and framework for implementation." Int J Product Res 58 (2020): 65-86.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Jieyang, Peng, Andreas Kimmig, Wang Dongkun and Zhibin Niu, et al. "A systematic review of data-driven approaches to fault diagnosis and early warning." J Intell Manufactur 34 (2023): 3277-3304.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at