GET THE APP

Data Privacy and Compliance in Cloud-based Systems
..

Journal of Computer Science & Systems Biology

ISSN: 0974-7230

Open Access

Brief Report - (2024) Volume 17, Issue 4

Data Privacy and Compliance in Cloud-based Systems

Hudson Roman*
*Correspondence: Hudson Roman, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Hanyang University, Ansan, Republic of Korea, Email:
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Hanyang University, Ansan, Republic of Korea

Received: 01-Jul-2024, Manuscript No. jcsb-24-145434; Editor assigned: 03-Jul-2024, Pre QC No. P-145434; Reviewed: 17-Jul-2024, QC No. Q-145434; Revised: 22-Jul-2024, Manuscript No. R-145434; Published: 29-Jul-2024 , DOI: 10.37421/0974-7230.2024.17.536
Citation: Roman, Hudson. “Data Privacy and Compliance in Cloud-based Systems.” J Comput Sci Syst Biol 17 (2024): 536.
Copyright: © 2024 Roman H. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution license which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

In the era of digital transformation, cloud-based systems have become integral to businesses, offering scalable resources, enhanced flexibility and cost efficiency. However, the shift from on-premises infrastructure to the cloud introduces significant concerns regarding data privacy and compliance. Organizations must navigate a complex landscape of regulations and best practices to protect sensitive information and ensure adherence to legal requirements. This article delves into the key aspects of data privacy and compliance in cloud-based, providing insights into challenges, regulations and strategies for maintaining robust data protection. Cloud-based systems leverage remote servers hosted on the internet to store, manage and process data. These systems are typically categorized into three main types: Provides virtualized computing resources over the internet [1].

Description

Offers hardware and software tools over the internet, often for application development. Delivers software applications over the internet, on a subscription basis. Each of these models presents unique privacy and compliance challenges due to their varying levels of control and management over the data and infrastructure. In cloud environments, data is managed by third-party providers, which can create concerns over data ownership and control. Organizations need clear agreements regarding data management and access rights. Cloud environments often involve multi-tenancy, where multiple clients share the same physical resources. Ensuring that data from different clients is properly segregated and secured is a critical challenge. Cloud providers may face security breaches or data loss incidents. Ensuring data integrity and developing a robust disaster recovery plan are essential for mitigating these risks [2,3].

Cloud providers often use data centers in various geographical locations. Understanding where data is stored and processed is crucial for compliance with regional data protection laws. Organizations must ensure that their cloud service providers comply with data protection standards and regulations. This requires thorough vetting and ongoing monitoring of vendor practices. The GDPR is a comprehensive data protection regulation in the European Union that governs the collection, storage and processing of personal data. Organizations using cloud services must ensure compliance with GDPR requirements, including data subject rights and cross-border data transfers. In the United States, HIPAA sets standards for the protection of health information. Cloud-based systems handling healthcare data must comply with HIPAA’s privacy and security rules.

The CCPA provides privacy rights to California residents, including the right to access and delete personal data. Cloud-based services serving California residents must adhere to CCPA provisions. FedRAMP provides a standardized approach to security assessment, authorization and continuous monitoring for cloud services used by federal agencies in the United States. In the UK, this Act complements the GDPR and includes additional provisions for data protection. Encrypting data at rest and in transit is a fundamental practice for protecting sensitive information. Encryption helps prevent unauthorized access and ensures data confidentiality. Implementing robust access controls, including multi-factor authentication and role-based access, helps safeguard data from unauthorized access and breaches. Conducting regular security audits and risk assessments can identify vulnerabilities and ensure that cloud services adhere to compliance requirements [4,5].

Establishing comprehensive data backup and recovery procedures ensures data integrity and availability in case of loss or breach. Crafting clear contracts and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) with cloud providers outlines data protection responsibilities, security measures and compliance obligations. Training employees on data privacy practices and security protocols helps mitigate human errors and enhance overall data protection. Continuously monitoring compliance with relevant regulations and standards helps organizations stay updated with legal requirements and adapt to changes. Data privacy and compliance in cloud-based system are paramount in today’s digital landscape. As organizations increasingly rely on cloud services, they must address privacy challenges, adhere to regulatory requirements and implement best practices to protect sensitive data.

Conclusion

By understanding the complexities of cloud environments and actively managing data protection, organizations can leverage the benefits of cloud computing while safeguarding their data and maintaining regulatory compliance. For more detailed guidance on specific regulations and best practices, organizations should consider consulting with data protection experts and legal advisors. Ensuring robust data privacy and compliance not only protects sensitive information but also builds trust with customers and stakeholders, fostering a secure and resilient digital ecosystem.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Sivakumar, Narain Kumar, Sabarinathan Palaniyappan, Vignesh Sekar and Abdullah Alodhayb, et al. "An optimization approach for studying the effect of lattice unit cell's design-based factors on additively manufactured poly methyl methacrylate cranio-implant." J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 141 (2023): 105791.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  2. Egan, Paul F., Veronica C. Gonella, Max Engensperger and Stephen J. Ferguson, et al. "Computationally designed lattices with tuned properties for tissue engineering using 3D printing." PloS One 12 (2017): e0182902.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Maevskaia, Ekaterina, Julien Guerrero, Chafik Ghayor and Indranil Bhattacharya, et al. "Triply periodic minimal surface-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: A mechanical, in vitro and in vivo study." Tissue Eng Part A 29 (2023): 507-517.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  4. Hayashi, Koichiro, Toshiki Yanagisawa, Ryo Kishida and Kunio Ishikawa. "Effects of scaffold shape on bone regeneration: Tiny shape differences affect the entire system." ACS Nano 16 (2022): 11755-11768.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Pedroso, Judith M., Marco Enger, Pedro Bandeira and Fernão D. Magalhães. "Comparative study of friction and wear performance of PEK, PEEK and PEKK binders in tribological coatings." Polymers 14 (2022): 4008.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 2279

Journal of Computer Science & Systems Biology received 2279 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Computer Science & Systems Biology peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward