Detection of Genomic Structural Variations Associated with Drug Sensitivity

Katri Sarvi^*
*Correspondence: Katri Sarvi, Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, Email:

Introduction

In the era of precision medicine, unravelling the intricate relationship between genomic structural variations and drug sensitivity has emerged as a critical frontier in personalized therapeutics. Structural Variations (SVs), including insertions, deletions, inversions, and translocations, play a pivotal role in shaping the genetic landscape of individuals and contribute significantly to inter-individual variability in drug response. Detecting and characterizing these SVs offer invaluable insights into the mechanisms underlying drug sensitivity, paving the way for tailored treatment strategies and improved patient outcomes. One of the primary challenges in deciphering the impact of genomic SVs on drug sensitivity lies in accurately identifying and characterizing these variations within the vast expanse of the human genome. Traditional sequencing techniques often overlook SVs or provide incomplete information due to limitations in read length, resolution, and coverage. However, recent advancements in high-throughput sequencing technologies, such as Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and long-read sequencing, have revolutionized the detection and characterization of SVs with unprecedented accuracy and depth.

Genomic Structural Variations (SVs) play a crucial role in shaping individual susceptibility to various diseases, including cancer. Identifying SVs associated with drug sensitivity has emerged as a promising avenue in personalized medicine, enabling the optimization of treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes. This article explores the current landscape of SV detection methodologies, their applications in drug sensitivity studies, challenges, and future prospects in leveraging SVs for precision medicine

Genomic Structural Variations (SVs) encompass a broad spectrum of genetic alterations, including insertions, deletions, duplications, inversions, and translocations, which affect large segments of DNA. These variations contribute significantly to inter-individual genetic diversity and have been implicated in numerous diseases, including cancer. In the era of precision medicine, understanding the role of SVs in drug response is paramount for tailoring therapeutic interventions to individual patients.

Description

Various high-throughput technologies have been developed to detect SVs, each with its strengths and limitations. These methods include Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (ACGH), Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) arrays, Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), and emerging technologies like long-read sequencing and optical mapping. While aCGH and SNP arrays offer genome-wide coverage and high-throughput capabilities, NGS provides nucleotide-level resolution, enabling precise characterization of SV breakpoints and complex rearrangements.

The integration of SV detection technologies with drug sensitivity assays has facilitated the identification of SVs associated with differential drug response. Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) and Expression Quantitative Trait Loci (eQTL) analyses have uncovered SVs affecting drug metabolism, transport, and target pathways. Moreover, functional genomics approaches, such as CRISPR-based screens and patient-derived xenograft models, have elucidated the functional consequences of SVs on drug sensitivity in preclinical settings [1,2]. Despite significant progress, several challenges hinder the widespread application of SVs in drug sensitivity studies. Technical issues, such as detection sensitivity, accuracy, and validation, remain paramount, particularly for complex SVs and low-frequency variants. Furthermore, integrating SV data with clinical annotations, such as treatment response and patient outcomes, requires robust bioinformatics pipelines and large-scale collaborative efforts. Ethical considerations regarding data sharing, privacy, and informed consent also warrant careful attention in genomic research.

Advances in SV detection technologies, coupled with multi omics integration and machine learning algorithms, hold promise for unravelling the intricate relationship between SVs and drug sensitivity. Long-read sequencing technologies, such as PacBio and Oxford Nanopore, offer enhanced resolution for detecting complex SVs and resolving repetitive regions of the genome. Additionally, single-cell sequencing approaches enable the characterization of SVs at unprecedented resolution, paving the way for understanding intra-tumoral heterogeneity and clonal evolution in drug response. Moreover, international consortia, such as the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), provide valuable resources for data sharing and collaborative research initiatives in deciphering the genomic landscape of drug sensitivity [3-5].

Conclusion

The detection of genomic structural variations associated with drug sensitivity represents a promising frontier in personalized medicine. By elucidating the genetic determinants of drug response, clinicians can tailor treatment regimens to individual patients, maximizing therapeutic efficacy while minimizing adverse effects. Despite challenges, on-going technological innovations and collaborative efforts hold the potential to revolutionize precision oncology and improve patient outcomes in the era of genomic medicine

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Kang, Changsoo. "Quantitative expression analysis of two NAGPA isoforms in multiple human cDNA tissue panels." J Biomed Sci 14 (2013): 65-70.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Kang, Changsoo, Sheikh Riazuddin, Jennifer Mundorff and Donna Krasnewich, et al. "Mutations in the lysosomal enzyme–targeting pathway and persistent stuttering." NEJM 3622010): 677-685.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Raza, M. Hashim, Carlos EF Domingues, Ronald Webster and Eduardo Sainz, et al. "Mucolipidosis types II and III and non-syndromic stuttering are associated with different variants in the same genes." Eur J Hum Genet 24 (2016): 529-534.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Gunasekaran, Nandhini Devi, Chandru Jayasankaran, Jeffrey Justin Margret and Mathuravalli Krishnamoorthy, et al. "Evaluation of recurrent GNPTAB, GNPTG, and NAGPA variants associated with stuttering." Adv Genet 2 (2021): e10043.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Dusl, Marina, Jan Senderek, Juliane S. Müller and Johannes G. Vogel, et al. "A 3′-UTR mutation creates a microRNA target site in the GFPT1 gene of patients with congenital myasthenic syndrome." Hum Mol Genet 24 (2015): 3418-3426.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at