Dynamic Surrogate Models are Reshaping Modeling and Simulation Landscapes

Larose Abbasi^*
*Correspondence: Larose Abbasi, Department of Mechanical Engineering Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK, Email:

Keywords

Dynamic surrogate models • Real-time adaptability • Modeling and simulation • Computational efficiency • Artificial intelligence • Machine learning

Introduction

Dynamic surrogate models are characterized by their ability to adapt and evolve in real-time. Unlike static models, these dynamic counterparts can adjust their parameters and structure based on changing inputs or environmental conditions. The incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques empowers these models to learn and optimize their performance over time. The versatility of dynamic surrogate models makes them applicable across various industries. In manufacturing, these models facilitate predictive maintenance by continuously adapting to equipment performance data. In healthcare, they enhance patient-specific treatment plans by adjusting to changing medical conditions. Environmental scientists leverage dynamic surrogates to simulate and predict the impact of climate change on ecosystems. One of the key advantages of dynamic surrogate models is their ability to adapt to real-time data. This feature is particularly crucial in fields where rapid changes occur, such as finance, where market conditions fluctuate frequently. By continuously learning from new information, these models can provide more accurate and up-to-date predictions [1].

Literature Review

Traditional models often struggle to handle the complexity of dynamic systems, leading to compromises in accuracy. Dynamic surrogate models, with their ability to evolve and refine themselves, provide a more accurate representation of the underlying processes. Moreover, the adaptability of these models contributes to increased computational efficiency, as they can focus resources on the most relevant aspects of the system. While dynamic surrogate models offer immense potential, challenges exist, including the need for large datasets and potential biases in the training data. Ongoing research aims to address these issues and further improve the robustness of these models. Additionally, the integration of dynamic surrogate models with emerging technologies like edge computing and the Internet of Things (IoT) presents exciting avenues for future exploration [2].

Dynamic surrogate models have ushered in a new era in the field of modeling and simulation. Their real-time adaptability, enhanced accuracy and efficiency make them invaluable tools across industries. As technology continues to advance, the integration of dynamic surrogate models with other cutting-edge technologies promises to reshape our understanding and application of modeling and simulation, paving the way for innovative solutions in an ever-changing world. The advent of Industry 4.0, characterized by the integration of digital technologies into manufacturing processes, aligns seamlessly with the capabilities of dynamic surrogate models. These models play a pivotal role in smart manufacturing systems by continuously adapting to the real-time data generated by sensors and IoT devices on the factory floor. This integration enables predictive maintenance, resource optimization and improved overall efficiency in production processes [3].

Discussion

Dynamic surrogate models encourage cross-disciplinary collaboration, as their adaptable nature allows experts from different domains to contribute to the development and refinement of the models. Engineers, data scientists and domain specialists can collaborate to create models that reflect the intricacies of complex systems more accurately. This collaborative approach fosters a holistic understanding of the systems being modeled, leading to more robust and reliable predictions. As dynamic surrogate models become increasingly sophisticated, ethical considerations come to the forefront. Issues related to data privacy, transparency in model decision-making and potential biases in the training data must be carefully addressed [4].

Researchers and practitioners need to implement ethical guidelines to ensure that these models are deployed responsibly and do not inadvertently perpetuate societal inequalities. The rise of dynamic surrogate models has implications for education and training in modeling and simulation. As these models become more prevalent, there is a growing need for professionals who can develop, implement and interpret the results of dynamic surrogate models. Educational programs must evolve to incorporate training in AI, machine learning and dynamic modeling techniques to prepare the workforce for the changing landscape of modeling and simulation [5,6].

Conclusion

Dynamic surrogate models have the potential to make a significant global impact by addressing complex challenges in areas such as climate change, healthcare and resource management. By providing more accurate and adaptable simulations, these models can inform decision-making processes at the governmental and international levels. This, in turn, can contribute to more effective policies and strategies for addressing global issues. Dynamic surrogate models are reshaping the modeling and simulation landscapes across industries. Their real-time adaptability, enhanced accuracy and efficiency are unlocking new possibilities for understanding and optimizing complex systems. As these models continue to evolve and integrate with emerging technologies, the future promises a more interconnected, adaptive and data-driven approach to modeling and simulation. With ongoing research and responsible deployment, dynamic surrogate models are set to play a pivotal role in addressing the challenges of our dynamic and ever-changing world.

Acknowledgement

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticisms of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares there is no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript.

References

1. Seeger, Matthias. "Gaussian processes for machine learning." Int J Neural Syst 14 (2004): 69-106.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Wiangkham, Attasit, Prasert Aengchuan, Rattanaporn Kasemsri and Auraluck Pichitkul, et al. "Improvement of mixed-mode I/II fracture toughness modeling prediction performance by using a multi-fidelity surrogate model based on fracture criteria." Mater 15 (2022): 8580.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Sun, Yazhen, Bincheng Gu, Lin Gao and Linjiang Li, et al. "Viscoelastic mechanical responses of HMAP under moving load." Mater 11 (2018): 2490.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Zhang, Chunyi, Jingshan Wei, Huizhe Jing and Chengwei Fei, et al. "Reliability-based low fatigue life analysis of turbine blisk with generalized regression extreme neural network method." Mater 12 (2019): 1545.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Silke, Emma J., William J. Pitz, Charles K. Westbrook and Marc Ribaucour. "Detailed chemical kinetic modeling of cyclohexane oxidation." J Phys Chem A 111 (2007): 3761-3775.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Morales, Jose Eduardo, Guillaume James and Arnaud Tonnelier. "Traveling waves in a spring-block chain sliding down a slope." Phys Rev E 96 (2017): 012227.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at