Dynamism of Tumour Cells and Tissues Metabolic Processes

Robert Sinn^*
*Correspondence: Robert Sinn, Department of Medical Genetics, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey, Email:

Introduction

Cytoplasmic organelles and proteins are degraded in large quantities as part of the dynamic process known as autophagy. Autophagy serves important roles in the quality regulation of cellular components and in providing nutrients and materials for newly formed structures in cells under metabolic stressors based on the function of "cellular recycling." It is still debatable whether autophagy has a physiological role in the development and spread of tumours. The prolonged survival of tumour cells, which are frequently subjected to metabolic stressors in vivo, may be improved by the cytoprotective role of autophagy in cells starved for nutrients. A conserved catabolic process called autophagy involves the sequestration of cytoplasmic organelles and long-lived proteins into an exclusive organelle called the autophagosome. The result is the formation and extension of an isolation membrane, which is a double membrane made up of two parallel lipid bilayers. The initial stage of autophagy involves the sequestration of cytoplasmic components by isolation membranes. The separation membrane is transformed into the autophagosome, a special lipid bilayer vesicular organelle, once its edges have fused.

According to reports, metabolic stressors cause apoptosis. The overexpression of anti-apoptotic molecules or the absence of pro-apoptotic molecules inhibits apoptosis in many tumour cells. The reduced mortality of cancer cells caused by metabolic stressors may be explained by less apoptosis, although it is yet unknown how cancer cells get the nutrients they require. The cells may digest their own constituent parts in order to obtain amino acids as a substitute energy source.

About the Study

Forty to seventy five percent of sporadic human malignancies of the breast, ovary, and prostate were found to have hemiallelic deletion of the Beclin 1 coding gene. Another hint came from a mouse model of Beclin 1 that was gene-targeted. Beclin 1 homozygous deletion caused embryonic death. In contrast, Beclin 1 heterozygous mutant mice displayed impaired autophagy and an increase in spontaneous malignancies, such as lymphomas, liver and lung cancers. The remaining wild-type allele of Beclin 1 was intact and there was no loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in these animals. Additionally, Beclin 1 protein expression was decreased but not totally eliminated in animal tumours and clinical samples from people [3-5].

Mammalian target of rapamycin is a crucial molecule for controlling the growth of cancer cells. Rapamycin induces autophagy after inhibiting mTOR activity. Autophagy is induced by molecules that decrease mTOR, such as the tumor-suppressor gene products PTEN and TSC. Class I PI3K and Akt, which are typically activated in a variety of cancer cells, suppress autophagy in the meantime. It has also been claimed that p53 is involved in the activation of autophagy. Contrary to the inhibitory effect of cytoplasmic p53 previously indicated, nuclear p53 plays a role in the activation of autophagy through its transactivating action. DRAM localises in the lysosomal membrane and is a direct transcriptional target of p53. In a DRAM-dependent manner, p53 activation caused an increase in autophagy [2].

When starvation was applied to the same autophagy-impaired epithelial cells, apparent necrotic cell death was seen when apoptosis was suppressed. Furthermore, the transplanted autophagy-deficient cells caused a large amount of inflammation in the tumour tissues. In vivo, necrosis is frequently linked to macrophage infiltration, and tumor-associated macrophages promote tumour growth. The idea that tumour development in vivo may be associated with the inflammation brought on by a lack of autophagy is intriguing. The aforementioned scenarios do not rule out the possibility that autophagy shields cancer cells from metabolic stress-induced death, and these putative mechanisms need additional investigation to clarify the physiological functions of autophagy in carcinogenesis [1,4].

The development of the autophagosome, the transfer of cytoplasmic components to the lysosome, and the digestion and recycling of these target molecules and organelles are only a few of the dynamic and numerous cellular mechanisms that carry out autophagy. It is necessary to measure the "autophagic flux" in order to accurately assess autophagic activity. When starvation was applied to the same autophagy-impaired epithelial cells, apparent necrotic cell death was seen when apoptosis was suppressed. Furthermore, the transplanted autophagy-deficient cells caused a large amount of inflammation in the tumour tissues. In vivo, necrosis is frequently linked to macrophage infiltration, and tumor-associated macrophages promote tumour growth. The idea that tumour development in vivo may be associated with the inflammation brought on by a lack of autophagy is intriguing [3].

Conclusion

Discussing the connection between autophagy and cancer is still difficult. In the context of the tumour microenvironment, it is important to comprehend the effects of the loss or gain of autophagy. Pro- or anti-tumorigenic autophagyrelated hypotheses have been put out in the past, and while they are plausible and intriguing, most of them have come from artificial experimental systems, and there isn't any direct clinico-pathological evidence to back them up. It has been challenging to assess autophagy in clinical tumour samples, mostly due to a lack of reliable markers for identifying active autophagy. Electron microscopy has been used to morphologically establish autophagosome production in tumour tissues, although this technique is unsuitable for handling numerous specimens.

REFERENCES

1. Asten, Alphons JAM van, Georgios N Nikolaou and Andrea Gröne. "The occurrence of cpb2-toxigenic Clostridium perfringens and the possible role of the β2-toxin in enteric disease of domestic animals, wild animals and humans." Vet J 183 (2010): 135-140.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Akao, Yukihiro, Hiroko Yamada and Yoshihito Nakagawa. "Arsenic-induced apoptosis in malignant cells in vitro." Leukemia Lymphoma 37 (2000): 53-63.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. James, Laura P, Philip R Mayeux and Jack A Hinson. "Acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity." Drug Metabol Dispos 31 (2003): 1499-1506.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Jackstadt, Rene and Heiko Hermeking. "MicroRNAs as regulators and mediators of c-MYC function." Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Gene Reg Mech 1849 (2015): 544-553.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Hughes, Clare E, Christopher B. Little and Bruce Caterson. "Measurement of aggrecanase-generated interglobular domain catabolites in the medium and extracts of cartilage explants using Western blot analysis." Inflammation Protocol (2003): 89-98.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at