GET THE APP

Effect of Biomarkers in Molecular Medicine
..

Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis

ISSN: 2155-9929

Open Access

Brief Report - (2022) Volume 13, Issue 2

Effect of Biomarkers in Molecular Medicine

Marcella Faria*
*Correspondence: Marcella Faria, Department of Molecular Biology, University of Cologne, Germany, Email:
Department of Molecular Biology, University of Cologne, Germany

Received: 02-Feb-2022, Manuscript No. Jmbd-22-58195; Editor assigned: 04-Feb-2022, Pre QC No. P-58195; Reviewed: 16-Feb-2022, QC No. Q-58195; Revised: 21-Feb-2022, Manuscript No. R-58195; Published: 28-Feb-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/ jmbd.2022.13.513
Citation: Faria, Marcella. “Effect of Biomarkers in Molecular Medicine.” J Mol Biomark Diagn 13 (2022): 513. DOI: 10.37421/ jmbd.2022.13.513.
Copyright: © 2022 Faria M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

About the Study

Current cancer diagnostic imaging methods are time-consuming and costly, particularly when screening large asymptomatic populations. Noninvasive screening methods that detect cancers in their early stages are essential for effective screening strategies. The use of molecular markers as tools for cancer detection and prognosis is gaining popularity. Newly discovered cancer biomarkers and advances in high-throughput technologies are expected to revolutionise cancer therapies by improving cancer risk assessment, early detection, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic response monitoring [1-3]. These biomarkers will be used as stand-alone tests or in conjunction with existing imaging methods.

There has been significant progress in both the understanding and treatment of cancer over the last three decades. Cancer remains the second leading cause of death in the United States, and the Director of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has challenged the cancer community to eliminate cancer-related suffering and death by 2015. Achieving this goal will necessitate not only improved therapies, but also improved methods for assessing an individual's risk of developing cancer, detecting cancers at an early stage when they can be treated more effectively, distinguishing aggressive from nonaggressive cancers, and monitoring recurrence and response to therapy. Improving methods for screening asymptomatic populations for early stage cancers is a particularly difficult problem.

Future Prospective

Achieving this goal will necessitate not only improved therapies, but also improved methods for assessing an individual's risk of developing cancer, detecting cancers at an early stage when they can be more effectively treated, distinguishing aggressive from nonaggressive cancers, and monitoring recurrence and response to therapy. Improving methods for screening asymptomatic populations for the presence of early stage cancers is a particularly difficult problem. The American Cancer Society recently recommended a variety of diagnostic tests to screen populations for the early detection of many cancers with a high incidence, including breast, colon, and prostate cancer [4]. However, there are no viable screening methods for other common cancers, such as lung cancer.

While diagnostic imaging methods can be used to identify cancer patients, many are too time-consuming and costly for screening large asymptomatic populations. Furthermore, some have encountered resistance from the general public because they can be embarrassing or inconvenient, limiting their utility for screening this group. Furthermore, diagnostic imaging methods frequently miss smaller lesions, resulting in the disease not being diagnosed until it is advanced, when therapeutic intervention is usually less effective. In recent years, there has been a surge in interest and enthusiasm for molecular markers as cancer detection and prognosis tools, both as stand-alone diagnostic tools and to supplement existing imaging methods and technologies [5].

Cancers develop as a result of a series of genetic and/or epigenetic changes that alter the proteins expressed in the affected cells. Posttranslational modifications can change the levels of specific proteins, as well as their functions and distributions. These protein changes can have an impact on cell metabolism and physiology, cell growth and death, and the secretion of molecules that communicate with other cells and tissues. In the field of cancer research, molecular biomarkers are substances that indicate the presence of cancer in the body. Genes and genetic variations, differences in messenger RNA (mRNA) and/or protein expression, posttranslational protein modifications, and metabolite levels are all examples of biomarkers.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Acknowledgement

None.

References

  1. Onsrud, Mathias, Ayman Shabana and  Rigmor Austgulen, et al. "Comparison between soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors and CA125 in peritoneal fluids as a marker for epithelial ovarian cancer." Gynecol Oncol 57 (1995): 183-187.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Luo, Liu Ying, Dionyssios Katsaros and Andreas Scorilas, et al. "The serum concentration of human kallikrein 10 represents a novel biomarker for ovarian cancer diagnosis and prognosis." Cancer Res 63 (2003): 807-811.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. McIntosh, Martin W, Yan Liu and Charles Drescher, et al. "Validation and characterization of human kallikrein 11 as a serum marker for diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma." Clin Cancer Res 13 (2007): 4422-4428.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Scorilas, Andreas, Carla A Borgono and Nadia Harbeck, et al. "Human kallikrein 13 protein in ovarian cancer cytosols: a new favorable prognostic marker." J Clin Oncol 22 (2004): 678-685.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Anderson, Garnet L, Martin McIntosh and Lieling Wu, et al. "Assessing lead time of selected ovarian cancer biomarkers: a nested case control study." J Natl Cancer Inst 102 (2010): 26-38.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 2054

Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis received 2054 citations as per Google Scholar report

Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward