Effects of Land Use Change on Watershed Hydrology: Case Studies and Predictive Models

Tom Fivash^*
*Correspondence: Tom Fivash, Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2600 GA Delft, Netherlands, Email:

Introduction

The effects of land use change on watershed hydrology are profound and multifaceted, shaping how water flows, infiltrates and interact within a given region. This topic has garnered significant attention due to its implications for water resources, environmental health and climate resilience. Understanding these effects involves examining case studies and employing predictive models to anticipate future impacts, offering a crucial perspective for managing water resources and planning sustainable land use. Land use change, driven by urbanization, agriculture, deforestation and other human activities, alters the natural landscape and, consequently, the hydrological processes within a watershed. When forests are converted to agricultural fields or urban areas, the natural flow of water is disrupted. Forests, for example, act as natural sponges, absorbing and slowly releasing water. They also contribute to soil stability and reduce runoff. When these forests are cleared, the ability of the land to absorb and slowly release water diminishes, leading to increased runoff and potential flooding.

One illustrative case study is the impact of deforestation in the Amazon Basin. The Amazon often referred to as the "lungs of the Earth," plays a critical role in regional and global hydrological cycles. Studies have shown that deforestation in this region has led to changes in rainfall patterns and increased surface runoff. Without the forest canopy to intercept and slow down rainfall, more water reaches the ground directly, leading to greater runoff and soil erosion. The loss of trees also means less evapotranspiration, which can reduce local humidity and alter rainfall patterns, potentially exacerbating drought conditions. Urbanization presents another significant land use change with profound effects on watershed hydrology [1,2]. Cities replace natural landscapes with impervious surfaces such as roads, buildings and pavements. These surfaces prevent water from infiltrating into the soil, increasing surface runoff and leading to higher peak flows in streams and rivers.

Description

The changes in hydrology can overwhelm drainage systems, leading to frequent and severe flooding. The city of Atlanta, Georgia, provides a compelling example. As the metropolitan area expanded, the conversion of land to impervious surfaces significantly altered the hydrological cycle. Research indicated that this urban sprawl increased the frequency and intensity of flooding events, demonstrating how land use changes can exacerbate flood risks in urban settings. Agricultural expansion and land management practices also have significant impacts on watershed hydrology. The conversion of natural landscapes to agricultural use often involves altering the land’s topography and implementing practices like irrigation, which change how water is distributed across the landscape [3,4]. In regions such as the Central Valley of California, extensive agricultural activities have led to changes in groundwater levels and surface water flows.

Irrigation practices, while essential for crop production, can lead to overextraction of water resources, altering the natural balance of the watershed. Moreover, the use of fertilizers and pesticides can affect water quality, leading to nutrient runoff and eutrophication in water bodies. Predictive models are invaluable tools for understanding and managing the effects of land use change on watershed hydrology. These models simulate various scenarios to predict how different land use changes might impact water flow, quality and availability. Hydrological models such as the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) or the Hydrologic Engineering Center's Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) incorporate data on land use, topography, soil types and climate to predict how changes in land use might influence hydrological outcomes.

For example, a study using the SWAT model in the Upper Mississippi River Basin examined how different land use scenarios, including increased urbanization and agricultural expansion, might affect water quality and quantity. The model projected that increased urbanization would lead to higher peak flows and increased pollutant loads in rivers, while agricultural expansion would affect groundwater recharge and surface runoff patterns. Such predictive insights help policymakers and planners make informed decisions about land use and water management strategies. Another critical aspect of predictive models is their ability to account for climate change. Models can integrate climate projections to assess how changes in temperature and precipitation might interact with land use changes to affect watershed hydrology [5]. For instance, a model simulating the impact of climate change on a watershed in the Pacific Northwest might reveal that increased temperatures could lead to reduced snowpack, affecting streamflow patterns and water availability. This information is crucial for adapting water management practices to future conditions and ensuring that water resources remain sustainable.

Conclusion

Overall, the interplay between land use change and watershed hydrology is complex and requires careful consideration of both empirical case studies and predictive modeling. Case studies provide valuable insights into realworld impacts and highlight the need for adaptive management strategies. Predictive models, on the other hand, offer a forward-looking approach, helping to anticipate potential challenges and guide decision-making processes. Effective management of watershed hydrology in the face of land use change necessitates a holistic approach that incorporates both historical data and future projections. By understanding the past impacts of land use changes and leveraging predictive models to anticipate future scenarios, stakeholders can develop strategies to mitigate negative effects and enhance the resilience of watersheds. This integrated approach is essential for ensuring the sustainability of water resources, protecting environmental health and supporting resilient communities in the face of ongoing and future changes.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Alvares, Clayton Alcarde, José Luiz Stape, Paulo Cesar Sentelhas and JL de M. Gonçalves, et al. "Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil." Meteorol Z 22 (2013): 711-728.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Chausson, Alexandre, Beth Turner, Dan Seddon and Nicole Chabaneix, et al. "Mapping the effectiveness of nature‐based solutions for climate change adaptation." Glob Change Biol 26 (2020): 6134-6155.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Dodds, Walter K., Joshuah S. Perkin and Joseph E. Gerken. "Human impact on freshwater ecosystem services: a global perspective." Environ Sci Technol 47 (2013): 9061-9068.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Rodríguez, José F., Patricia M. Saco, Steven Sandi and Neil Saintilan, et al. "Potential increase in coastal wetland vulnerability to sea-level rise suggested by considering hydrodynamic attenuation effects." Nat Commun 8 (2017): 16094.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Myšiak, J., J. D. Brown, J. M. L. Jansen and N. W. T. Quinn. "Chapter Six Environmental Policy Aid Under Uncertainty." Devel Integr Environ Assess 3 (2008): 87-100.

   Google Scholar, Crossref