Electrostatic Properties of Poly Vinylidene Fluoride

Ane Galarneau^*
*Correspondence: Ane Galarneau, Research Director, CNRS Institute Charles Gerhardt of Montpellier, France, Email:

Editorial

Electroactive polymers are one of the most intriguing types of polymers utilised as smart materials in a variety of applications, including sensors, actuators, energy harvesting, and biomaterials in the biomedical area. Among the few polymers that exhibit piezoelectricity, pyroelectricity, or ferroelectricity, such as Nylon-11, polylactic acid, and poly, poly and its copolymers have the finest all-around electroactive characteristics, making them the polymer of choice for a growing number of applications. This semi-crystalline polymer has a complicated structure and may display five unique crystalline phases associated to diverse chain conformations defined as all trans planar zigzag for the phase, trans-gauche–trans-gauche for the and I phases, and T3GT3G for and –phases [1].

The large electrical dipole moment of the PVDF monomer unit, which is attributable to the electronegativity of fluorine atoms in comparison to hydrogen and carbon atoms, is responsible for many of PVDF's noteworthy features, particularly those linked to its usage as a sensor or actuator. Each chain has a dipole moment perpendicular to the polymer chain as a result of this arrangement. As in the polar and I phases, the monomer units and therefore the dipolar moments are packed in a morphology that can reveal an overall dipolar contribution per unit cell. When compared to the other two phases, this phase exhibits the most dipolar moment per unit cell [2].

Due to the antiparallel packing of the dipoles within the unit cell, the phases are non-polar. Due to the high interest in application fields such as sensors, actuators, batteries, filters, chemical warfare protection, magnetoelectric, and, more recently, in the biomedical arena, the promotion of the and phases within the material is an on-going goal. To acquire the electroactive phases of PVDF, many techniques have been devised, concentrating primarily on the creation of specialised processing procedures and the presence of appropriate fillers [3].

Another significant difficulty is that some of the reported results for identifying and quantifying both and phases are contradictory: due to the similarities of the - phase specific conformations, their characteristics are identical. The bands and X-ray diffraction peaks commonly utilised for phase identification in Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy, FTIR, either coincide or are very near to one other, making it difficult to discriminate between the two phases. This study focuses on the identification of each electroactive phase, the tactics employed to generate them, and the extra effects of fillers, as well as the usage of certain of them as PVDF nucleating agents, due to the growing interest and great potential of this electroactive polymer [4].

Finally, some of the more fascinating and difficult applications will be discussed. The family of polymers with the greatest dielectric constant and electroactive response, including piezoelectric, pyroelectric, and ferroelectric effects, is Poly, PVDF, and its copolymers. Electroactive characteristics are becoming more essential in a variety of applications, including biomedicine, energy generation and storage, monitoring and control, and the development of sensors and actuators, separator and filter membranes, and smart scaffolds.

The polymer should be in one of its electroactive phases for many of these uses. This paper outlines the major properties of the electroactive phases of PVDF and copolymers, as well as the various processing procedures and methods for determining phase composition. Recent breakthroughs in the creation of electroactive composites are also discussed which allow for unique effects such as magnetoelectric responses and open up new application areas. Finally, we'll go through some of the most intriguing prospective applications and processing issues [5].

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Zhang, Diming, and Qingjun Liu. "Biosensors and bioelectronics on smartphone for portable biochemical detection." Biosens Bioelectron 75 (2016): 273-284.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Li, Shuang, Daizong Ji, Gang Xu, and Jinglong Liu, et al. "Biosensors and Bioelectronics on Smartphone." Handbook of Cell Biosensors (2022): 627-655.

Google Scholar, Indexed at

3. Zhang, Diming, and Qingjun Liu. "Biosensors and bioelectronics on smartphone for portable biochemical detection." Biosens Bioelectron 75 (2016): 273-284.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Su, Kaiqi, Xianxin Qiu, Jiaru Fang, and Quchao Zou, et al. "An improved efficient biochemical detection method to marine toxins with a smartphone-based portable system—Bionic e-Eye." Sens Actuators B Chem 238 (2017): 1165-1172.

Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Lu, Yanli, Zhenghan Shi, and Qingjun Liu. "Smartphone-based biosensors for portable food evaluation." Curr Opin Food Sci 28 (2019): 74-81.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at